Radioactive danish?

--
David Fontaine   <dav### [at] faricynet>   ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website:  http://davidf.faricy.net/

Post a reply to this message

Urp.

-- 
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/

Post a reply to this message

Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:
> On another version oft his image I also tried to add
> a normal that makes the yellow (that was green
> before) seem like it sticks on top of the object's
> surface (also suggested by Christoph Hormann).
> 
> But I didn't succeeded in doing so  :(
> 
> Is it not possible to use the granite keyword within
> a normal {} statement ?

??  I tried it here.  (I used granite 2 for emphasis.)

-- 
Anton Sherwood  --  br0### [at] p0b0xcom  --  http://ogre.nu/

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'ugly.jpg' (23 KB)

Preview of image 'ugly.jpg'

Disgusting!

ZK
http://www.povplace.be.tf

Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:
> 
> This time the blob only contains 12 positive sphere
> components (scaled).
> 
> (The "Just another blob" image contained 18.)
> 
> The background is now faded down as Christoph
> Hormann suggested.
> 
> On another version oft his image I also tried to add
> a normal that makes the yellow (that was green
> before) seem like it sticks on top of the object's
> surface (also suggested by Christoph Hormann).
> 
> But I didn't succeeded in doing so  :(
> 
> Is it not possible to use the granite keyword within
> a normal {} statement ?
> 
> Tor Olav
> --
> mailto:tor### [at] hotmailcom
> http://www.crosswinds.net/~tok/tokrays.html
> 
>   ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>  [Image]

Post a reply to this message

Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:
> 
> This time the blob only contains 12 positive sphere
> components (scaled).
> 
> (The "Just another blob" image contained 18.)
> 
> The background is now faded down as Christoph
> Hormann suggested.

The background looks better now, even though i did not mean to make it darker
but to use a softer pattern/color_map.  

> 
> On another version oft his image I also tried to add
> a normal that makes the yellow (that was green
> before) seem like it sticks on top of the object's
> surface (also suggested by Christoph Hormann).
> 
> But I didn't succeeded in doing so  :(
> 

The problem with normals is that stronger effects always look somewhat faked, so
you should probaly be careful not making it too strong.  

I made a quick try with some isosurface slime, it's not nearly as disgusting as
your one and the textuing is slightly wrong, but it shows the possibilities.  

BTW, I used the blob pattern for the basic shape here.

Christoph

--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'blobtst1.jpg' (17 KB)

Preview of image 'blobtst1.jpg'

I'm afraid that I disagree with everyone else so far. This is not ugly at all,
the colour and form are quite beautiful (although I have to admit that I might
change my mind if I found this thing stuck to my face).

Post a reply to this message

Richard Morton wrote:

> I'm afraid that I disagree with everyone else so far. This is not ugly at all,
> the colour and form are quite beautiful (although I have to admit that I might
> change my mind if I found this thing stuck to my face).

I think you just feel sorry for it ;)

--
David Fontaine   <dav### [at] faricynet>   ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website:  http://davidf.faricy.net/

Post a reply to this message

Nice doughnut. Looks... Gross, really gross. Like the jelly burst out. And
someone put mustard on it. My sister says "It's toe jam!"

Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:

> This time the blob only contains 12 positive sphere
> components (scaled).
>
> (The "Just another blob" image contained 18.)
>
> The background is now faded down as Christoph
> Hormann suggested.
>
> On another version oft his image I also tried to add
> a normal that makes the yellow (that was green
> before) seem like it sticks on top of the object's
> surface (also suggested by Christoph Hormann).
>
> But I didn't succeeded in doing so  :(
>
> Is it not possible to use the granite keyword within
> a normal {} statement ?
>
> Tor Olav
> --
> mailto:tor### [at] hotmailcom
> http://www.crosswinds.net/~tok/tokrays.html
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  [Image]

--
"Yub-Yub!" Lt. Kettch

Post a reply to this message

I think those colors make it even more evil looking than the first.

Ken Matassa

Post a reply to this message

Tor Olav Kristensen wrote:

Thank you to all that commented on this "Toe Jam" image. =)
I'm sorry for replying so late.

I have now managed to use the granite keyword in the
normal statement. My error. Thank you Christoph and
Anton for convincing me that it was possible.

I have now found that textures is much more fun than
I thought.


Tor Olav
--
mailto:tor### [at] hotmailcom
http://www.crosswinds.net/~tok/tokrays.html

Post a reply to this message