Bill DeWitt wrote:
> 
>     To me it has a microscopic look. Like maybe the machines are nanobots
> and the furry thing is a virus type thing.

Yeah, I agree. It's probably because of the focal blur. But since I don't know
exactly how to fix it, I don't want to :)

-- 
Margus Ramst

Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peakeduee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message

Paul Jones wrote:
> 
> Could you post the code???
> 

I'll do one more version before. And the code will inevitably be a mess.

-- 
Margus Ramst

Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peakeduee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message

Rune wrote:
> 
> I liked the creature much better before. It looked less like a beast, and
> more helpless. That made the scene make less sense, which I really liked.
> 

Actually, I tend to agree with you. What really bothered me about the old
creature was that it seemed too featureless, not a real animal but a toy. I must
figure out how to make it look absurd, and yet not fake...

-- 
Margus Ramst

Personal e-mail: mar### [at] peakeduee
TAG (Team Assistance Group) e-mail: mar### [at] tagpovrayorg

Post a reply to this message