 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000 17:16:37 -0400, "Bill DeWitt"
<the### [at] earthlink net> wrote:
>> Render time - 12 hours on a p3 650 & 230MB ram.
>
> Couldn't you think of any other name for this.
But Bill, by any other name it would look as great...
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Tony[B]" wrote:
>
> Admit it... you're just too cheap to buy her real roses... (that, or you're
> poor like the rest of us :)
>
> Great work. I want photons and area_lights next time. ;)
I think area lights were used. Look at the banding on the wall.
--
Francois Labreque | Rimmer: "Let's go to red alert!"
flabreq | Kryten: "Are you sure, Sir? You realize it
@ | actually means changing the bulb!"
attglobal.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Tony[B]
Subject: Re: A Rose. (800x600 - RAD-AA-FB - FINAL) 51Kbbu
Date: 26 Jun 2000 23:06:06
Message: <39581a1e@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sure that isn't just focal_blur or multiple lights?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: A Rose. (800x600 - RAD-AA-FB - FINAL) 51Kbbu
Date: 27 Jun 2000 03:37:52
Message: <395859d0@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rick" <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote in message news:395768c3@news.povray.org...
| Render time - 12 hours on a p3 650 & 230MB ram.
A shocking amount of time for such a computer, but I don't shock as easily
anymore.
She has got to like this. Wonderfully done. The little beads look like water
maybe, in which case they are sitting on a extremely waxy surface. I don't
care much for faceted organic objects but this still looks neat.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Beautiful
Water droplets tend to flatten out more - due to gravity (unless they
are glass :-)
I never saw a specular rose
But now I have
Pabs
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Rick
Subject: Re: A Rose. (800x600 - RAD-AA-FB - FINAL) 51Kbbu
Date: 27 Jun 2000 05:58:28
Message: <39587ac4@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> If my memory is correct, focal blur does it's own anti-aliasing,
> ignoring the usual kind. Or was it post_process focal_blur? Or do you
> mean something else by "aa"?
nope, regular povray aa. - i will have to try it without aa on and see what
happens.
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Rick
Subject: Re: A Rose. (800x600 - RAD-AA-FB - FINAL) 51Kbbu
Date: 27 Jun 2000 05:58:29
Message: <39587ac5@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Great work. I want photons and area_lights next time. ;)
there are area lights!, there just tight - i wanted shadows!
photons? err yeah when i figure them out and have another 10+ hours computer
time spare!
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bill DeWitt" <the### [at] earthlinknet> wrote in message
news:3957c833@news.povray.org...
>
> "Rick" <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote in message news:395768c3@news.povray.org...
> > Render time - 12 hours on a p3 650 & 230MB ram.
> >
>
> Couldn't you think of any other name for this.
>
>
what, like Gerald or something?
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Water droplets tend to flatten out more - due to gravity (unless they
> are glass :-)
yes there glass - i was going to do either petals or water, but glass beads
seemed to look better.
> I never saw a specular rose
> But now I have
i tried it without a highlight, and it didnt have the same effect, a touch
of highlight helped to show it up.
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
the banding is caused by some blinds off set with a tight area light behind
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
