 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Two quick outdoors radiosity tests. I think these are quite
acceptable. The sky is image mapped sphere with ambient 1.
The temple:
grass diffuse 0.05
stone diffuse 0.38
sun color <1,0.92,0.7>*4.5
Domes:
diffuse/sun_intensity ratio increased by 100%
which means twice as much abient light from the sky.
_______________________________________________________________________
Kari Kivisalo www.kivisalo.net
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'radiosity_sky2.jpg' (19 KB)
Download 'radiosity_sky.jpg' (27 KB)
Preview of image 'radiosity_sky2.jpg'
Preview of image 'radiosity_sky.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Outstanding work on the domes. There is some color bleed from the grass to
the clouds in the temple pic (especially on the left side), is that caused
by the radiosity or is it just a jpg compression problem?
Regards,
Dave
PS - Your experiments are very helpful!
"Kari Kivisalo" <kar### [at] kivisalo net> wrote in message
news:3947AB86.1450F605@kivisalo.net...
>
> Two quick outdoors radiosity tests. I think these are quite
> acceptable. The sky is image mapped sphere with ambient 1.
>
>
> The temple:
>
> grass diffuse 0.05
> stone diffuse 0.38
> sun color <1,0.92,0.7>*4.5
>
> Domes:
>
> diffuse/sun_intensity ratio increased by 100%
> which means twice as much abient light from the sky.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Kari Kivisalo www.kivisalo.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dave Blandston wrote:
>
> There is some color bleed from the grass to
> the clouds in the temple pic (especially on the left side), is that caused
> by the radiosity or is it just a jpg compression problem?
It's actually grass in the image itself :) Since the sky sphere has
diffuse 0 it doesn't receive diffuse light from other objects.
_______________________________________________________________________
Kari Kivisalo www.kivisalo.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 14 Jun 2000 18:57:58 +0300, Kari Kivisalo <kar### [at] kivisalonet>
wrote:
>
>Two quick outdoors radiosity tests. I think these are quite
>acceptable. The sky is image mapped sphere with ambient 1.
The domes are outstanding! The temple, well, the sky distracts me too
much from the radiosity effects. Try something more subtle or don't
show the sky at all, just put it there to light up the scene.
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very cool, once again. Let us know when you get it perfected. Maybe your
settings can become defaults for MegaPOV.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
