 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sigmund's diamond posts have inspired me to try a diamond with
photons....
this is my try any comments and suggestions would be greatly admired....
FYI i shot 4 million photons at this diamond and only took about an
hour to render. and the source code for the textures will be in the
P.B.Scene-files.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'dia2.jpg' (43 KB)
Preview of image 'dia2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very nice, but looks more like ice than diamond.
Also, some very circular whatchamacallits at the front...
"Psychomek" <psy### [at] home com> wrote in message
news:393E59D0.2EBF81B9@home.com...
> Sigmund's diamond posts have inspired me to try a diamond with
> photons....
>
>
> this is my try any comments and suggestions would be greatly admired....
>
> FYI i shot 4 million photons at this diamond and only took about an
> hour to render. and the source code for the textures will be in the
> P.B.Scene-files.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Lacking visible facets but the photons are scattering around well enough. By
that I just meant there isn't the obvious set of plane surfaces. No ambient
and diffuse at all then? Possibly no reflection either? It's not easy to see
if so (reflection).
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think it needs more photons. I was recently battling this same problem and
found that I had to crank the photon count up really high.
Tom Melly <tom### [at] tomandluf9couk> wrote in message
news:393e2e7f@news.povray.org...
> Very nice, but looks more like ice than diamond.
>
> Also, some very circular whatchamacallits at the front...
>
> "Psychomek" <psy### [at] homecom> wrote in message
> news:393E59D0.2EBF81B9@home.com...
> > Sigmund's diamond posts have inspired me to try a diamond with
> > photons....
> >
> >
> > this is my try any comments and suggestions would be greatly admired....
> >
> > FYI i shot 4 million photons at this diamond and only took about an
> > hour to render. and the source code for the textures will be in the
> > P.B.Scene-files.
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ooops, I spoke too soon - I didn't read the fine print. If its 4
mega-photons, and it took an hour, that seems reasonable. Sorry for the
babble.
David Cook <nos### [at] homecom> wrote in message
news:393e6dff$1@news.povray.org...
> I think it needs more photons. I was recently battling this same problem
and
> found that I had to crank the photon count up really high.
>
> Tom Melly <tom### [at] tomandluf9couk> wrote in message
> news:393e2e7f@news.povray.org...
> > Very nice, but looks more like ice than diamond.
> >
> > Also, some very circular whatchamacallits at the front...
> >
> > "Psychomek" <psy### [at] homecom> wrote in message
> > news:393E59D0.2EBF81B9@home.com...
> > > Sigmund's diamond posts have inspired me to try a diamond with
> > > photons....
> > >
> > >
> > > this is my try any comments and suggestions would be greatly
admired....
> > >
> > > FYI i shot 4 million photons at this diamond and only took about an
> > > hour to render. and the source code for the textures will be in the
> > > P.B.Scene-files.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It's hard to make out the facets. I'm using reflection to see them. I see
from the source that you're using a transmit value. I can't think of an
argument why you shouldn't; I've just never used transmit with glass and
such.
Your caustics are nice.. I'm still not happy with mine.
sig
--
ICQ 74734588
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 07 Jun 2000 21:50:15 +0200, Sigmund Kyrre Aas
<sig### [at] kyrrenet> wrote:
>It's hard to make out the facets. I'm using reflection to see them. I see
>from the source that you're using a transmit value. I can't think of an
>argument why you shouldn't; I've just never used transmit with glass and
>such.
That's because glass, gems and liquids filter light.
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly wrote:
>
> Very nice, but looks more like ice than diamond.
>
> Also, some very circular whatchamacallits at the front...
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
