Paul Daniel Jones wrote in message <391AA28C.270B86DD@psu.edu>...
>sorry for the large image, but I wanted to preserve the delicate
>refractions for all to see.
>
>comments?
>
>-paul


Wonderful.

Would you mind posting the texture for the glass and the photon settings
please?

Thanks
Gail
********************************************************************
* gsh### [at] monotixcoza              * Reality.dat not found         *
* http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/ * Attempting to reboot universe *
********************************************************************
* The best way to accelerate Windows NT is at 9.8 m/s^2      *
********************************************************************

Post a reply to this message

Wow....
This should be a proud moment for Nathan.

Paul Daniel Jones wrote:
> 
> sorry for the large image, but I wanted to preserve the delicate
> refractions for all to see.
> 
> comments?
> 
> -paul
> 
> --
> -------------------------------------------#
> Paul Daniel Jones
> 307 Chandlee Laboratory
> Penn State University
> 814-865-2090
> pdj### [at] psuedu
> 
> http://research.chem.psu.edu/glassgrp/paul
> --------------------------------------------#
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  [Image]

Post a reply to this message

I was trying to figure out the criss-cross of lines seen most noticeably
in the bottom two sphere at far right.  Any thoughts?

Bob

Post a reply to this message

I think that this arises from the fact that I have multiple light sources (5
spots...) and the lines might be artifacts from the various reflections off
the floor.

Bob Hughes wrote:

> I was trying to figure out the criss-cross of lines seen most noticeably
> in the bottom two sphere at far right.  Any thoughts?
>
> Bob

--
-------------------------------------------#
Paul Daniel Jones
307 Chandlee Laboratory
Penn State University
814-865-2090
pdj### [at] psuedu

http://research.chem.psu.edu/glassgrp/paul
--------------------------------------------#

Post a reply to this message

Oh? Reflections?  It seemed exactly like the refraction so I didn't
suspect that to be any part of reflection.
Thanks.

Bob

"Paul Daniel Jones" <pdj### [at] psuedu> wrote in message news:391AE9F8.85F057E4@psu.edu...
| I think that this arises from the fact that I have multiple light sources (5
| spots...) and the lines might be artifacts from the various reflections off
| the floor.
|
| Bob Hughes wrote:
|
| > I was trying to figure out the criss-cross of lines seen most noticeably
| > in the bottom two sphere at far right.  Any thoughts?

Post a reply to this message

You can never go wrong with caustics and media. :) Great job.

Post a reply to this message

"Paul Daniel Jones" <pdj### [at] psuedu> skrev i meddelandet
news:391AA28C.270B86DD@psu.edu...
> sorry for the large image, but I wanted to preserve the delicate
> refractions for all to see.
> comments?

My jaw simply dropped to the floor when I first saw this pic!
The thing in the lower left corner is a tad distracting, but otherwise,
wow...

Post a reply to this message

They look like bath oil beads.

--
David Fontaine     <dav### [at] faricynet>     ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/

Post a reply to this message

I have posted the code to p.b.s-f. Feel free to use any and all of the
things contained in it (just mention my name some where :-)

Thank you for all you kind words.... occasionally I happen to stumble onto
something neat....

-paul

Gail Shaw wrote:

> Paul Daniel Jones wrote in message <391AA28C.270B86DD@psu.edu>...
> >sorry for the large image, but I wanted to preserve the delicate
> >refractions for all to see.
> >
> >comments?
> >
> >-paul
>
> Wonderful.
>
> Would you mind posting the texture for the glass and the photon settings
> please?
>
> Thanks
> Gail
> ********************************************************************
> * gsh### [at] monotixcoza              * Reality.dat not found         *
> * http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/ * Attempting to reboot universe *
> ********************************************************************
> * The best way to accelerate Windows NT is at 9.8 m/s^2      *
> ********************************************************************

Post a reply to this message

Paul Daniel Jones wrote in message <391AA28C.270B86DD@psu.edu>...
>sorry for the large image, but I wanted to preserve the delicate
>refractions for all to see.


I finally got around to looking at this, and I have only one question:
How many years did it take to render?

Mark

Post a reply to this message