 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Some surgical equipment to go in my Facehugger scene, any suggestions for
some more, or any links to reference images.
Regards,
Peter H.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'tools.jpg' (21 KB)
Preview of image 'tools.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
go to my web-site www.geocities.com/mikepweber/stills.html and I did an
image of a product that is used in hospitals. Even ER used it in one of
their shows (the product, not my drawing...).
--
Mike
wk: mik### [at] pyxis com www.pyxis.com
hm: mwe### [at] sciticom www.geocities.com/mikepweber
"Peter Houston" <hou### [at] inamecom> wrote in message
news:39196aeb@news.povray.org...
> Some surgical equipment to go in my Facehugger scene, any suggestions for
> some more, or any links to reference images.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter H.
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
A big chest cutting saw..... would be cool
Peter Houston wrote:
> Some surgical equipment to go in my Facehugger scene, any suggestions for
> some more, or any links to reference images.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter H.
>
> [Image]
--
-------------------------------------------#
Paul Daniel Jones
307 Chandlee Laboratory
Penn State University
814-865-2090
pdj### [at] psuedu
http://research.chem.psu.edu/glassgrp/paul
--------------------------------------------#
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Weber wrote:
>
> go to my web-site www.geocities.com/mikepweber/stills.html and I did an
> image of a product that is used in hospitals. Even ER used it in one of
> their shows (the product, not my drawing...).
What's this Cubie Programming Station thingy?
Markus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Its used in a hospital pharmacy. Drugs and medicine are placed into these
cubies which have memory so that it can be programmed with what med it has.
They are distributed through out the hospital to medical stations, which
look just the same - but different software. The stations can then open the
cubie so a nurse can remove the meds.
There's more in p.o-t
--
Mike
wk: mik### [at] pyxiscom www.pyxis.com
hm: mwe### [at] sciticom www.geocities.com/mikepweber
"Markus Becker" <mar### [at] studentuni-siegende> wrote in message
news:3919823F.9C0227FC@student.uni-siegen.de...
> Mike Weber wrote:
> >
> > go to my web-site www.geocities.com/mikepweber/stills.html and I did an
> > image of a product that is used in hospitals. Even ER used it in one of
> > their shows (the product, not my drawing...).
>
> What's this Cubie Programming Station thingy?
>
> Markus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Peter Houston wrote:
> Some surgical equipment to go in my Facehugger scene, any suggestions for
> some more, or any links to reference images.
Looks good so far! Maybe a little more wear and tear (scuff marks, variable
finish, etc..)
http://www.italpro.com/medesy/index.htm has some dental equipment that can
sub in as surgical tools. Scary enough...
Simon
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <39196aeb@news.povray.org>, hou### [at] inamecom says...
> Some surgical equipment to go in my Facehugger scene, any suggestions for
> some more, or any links to reference images.
[snip]
I almost hate to say this, but the scalpel on the tray looks more like a
craft knife...
Bye for now,
Jamie.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
try scissors
catheter
laser knife
imagination
etc.
Peter Houston wrote:
>
> Some surgical equipment to go in my Facehugger scene, any suggestions for
> some more, or any links to reference images.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter H.
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I've seen several different shapes of scalpel blades. That's one of 'em. I
like the curvy ones more.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Peter Houston <hou### [at] inamecom> wrote in message
news:39196aeb@news.povray.org...
> Some surgical equipment to go in my Facehugger scene, any suggestions for
> some more, or any links to reference images.
For something creepier, you could try making something akin to the tools
used in the Wes Craven horror Dead Ringers. I did a cursory search on the
web but couldn't find anything except one shot (attached). As I recall, they
had an organic, pseudo-Gigerish look to them.
David
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'deadringers.gif' (13 KB)
Preview of image 'deadringers.gif'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks like an exacto(sp?) knife
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Weber wrote:
> go to my web-site www.geocities.com/mikepweber/stills.html and I did an
> image of a product that is used in hospitals. Even ER used it in one of
> their shows (the product, not my drawing...).
The other one looks like a Penguin 8500... *drool*
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks like a (censored) and uterus, leading to falopian tubes and ovaries. I
don't want to know how you use that.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TonyB <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote in message
news:391a2eae@news.povray.org...
> Looks like a (censored) and uterus, leading to falopian tubes and ovaries.
I
> don't want to know how you use that.
I agree.. On all counts. In the movie, Jeremy Irons portrays twin
gynecologists who seem to suffer from some serious mental problems. That's a
pic of one of the tools they used. All of their tools are of a similar
disturbing nature.
David
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wasn't it a David Cronenburg flick?
"David Heys" <sou### [at] gcinet> wrote in message
news:391a1a7d@news.povray.org...
> For something creepier, you could try making something akin to the tools
> used in the Wes Craven horror Dead Ringers.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly <tom### [at] tomandluf9couk> wrote in message
news:391a6af2$1@news.povray.org...
> Wasn't it a David Cronenburg flick?
Could be. I may have mixed the two up.
David
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 10 May 2000 11:04:36 -0400, Paul Daniel Jones wrote:
>A big chest cutting saw..... would be cool
>
And add protective goggles and maybe a blow torch: this could
get grousome.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
8:59am up 14 days, 11:00, 3 users, load average: 1.56, 1.33, 1.15
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly wrote:
> "David Heys" <sou### [at] gcinet> wrote:
> > For something creepier, you could try making something akin to the tools
> > used in the Wes Craven horror Dead Ringers.
>
> Wasn't it a David Cronenburg flick?
Try David Cronenberg, here's the link:
<URL:http://us.imdb.com/Title?Dead+Ringers>
Btw, why don't you quote below original text?
--
Børge Berg-Olsen
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+47 90 62 71 78 DoD#2101, DoDRT#017, NIC#015, PJ#006, OGM#007
azo### [at] dodno, Ducati M600 Ubesudlet: Aldri eid en J&%#PS.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
What is a Penguin 8500?
--
Mike
wk: mik### [at] pyxiscom www.pyxis.com
hm: mwe### [at] sciticom www.geocities.com/mikepweber
"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricynet> wrote in message
news:391A1C92.1966CFD6@faricy.net...
> Mike Weber wrote:
>
> > go to my web-site www.geocities.com/mikepweber/stills.html and I did an
> > image of a product that is used in hospitals. Even ER used it in one of
> > their shows (the product, not my drawing...).
>
> The other one looks like a Penguin 8500... *drool*
>
> --
> David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
> Please visit my website: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
and rubber gloves and a rubber apron....
--
Mike
wk: mik### [at] pyxiscom www.pyxis.com
hm: mwe### [at] sciticom www.geocities.com/mikepweber
"Steve" <sjl### [at] ndirectcouk> wrote in message
news:slr### [at] zero-ppslocaldomain...
> On Wed, 10 May 2000 11:04:36 -0400, Paul Daniel Jones wrote:
> >A big chest cutting saw..... would be cool
> >
>
> And add protective goggles and maybe a blow torch: this could
> get grousome.
>
> --
> Cheers
> Steve email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
>
> %HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
>
> web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/
>
> or http://start.at/zero-pps
>
> 8:59am up 14 days, 11:00, 3 users, load average: 1.56, 1.33, 1.15
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 11 May 2000 07:34:19 -0700, "Mike Weber"
<mik### [at] pyxiscom> wrote:
>and rubber gloves and a rubber apron....
And a four-pound sledgehammer and a nine inch nail and a Husqvarna
chainsaw and a Rambo knife and a scythe...
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks more like an exacto knife than a scalpel.
Peter Houston wrote:
> Some surgical equipment to go in my Facehugger scene, any suggestions for
> some more, or any links to reference images.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter H.
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike Weber wrote:
> What is a Penguin 8500?
http://www.penguincomputing.com/8500info.html
not that much i guess, but similar
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
its modeled after this:
http://www.icsadvent.com/products/pdproductdetail.cfm?keyProduct=739
I once worked their, but before their slow web-site ever existed.
--
Mike
wk: mik### [at] pyxiscom www.pyxis.com
hm: mwe### [at] sciticom www.geocities.com/mikepweber
"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricynet> wrote in message
news:391B3709.4784C84A@faricy.net...
> Mike Weber wrote:
>
> > What is a Penguin 8500?
>
> http://www.penguincomputing.com/8500info.html
> not that much i guess, but similar
>
> --
> David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
> Please visit my website: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I chop and change. Short replies I generally put the quote at the end.
Longer replies I quote at the beginning. I'm certainly not consistent or
particularily logical about it. Is there a standard netiquette?
"Børge Berg-Olsen" <azo### [at] dodno> wrote in message
news:391AB3E8.4A62A49A@dod.no...
>
> Btw, why don't you quote below original text?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I switch it around on rare occasions and do as you said here.
"Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandluf9couk> wrote in message
news:391bc0f6$1@news.povray.org...
| I chop and change. Short replies I generally put the quote at the end.
| Longer replies I quote at the beginning. I'm certainly not consistent or
| particularily logical about it. Is there a standard netiquette?
|
| "Børge Berg-Olsen" <azo### [at] dodno> wrote in message
| news:391AB3E8.4A62A49A@dod.no...
| >
| > Btw, why don't you quote below original text?
However, for the most part I usually let the quote go afterward of anything
I say unless it seems I need to splice into the previous message someplace
in the middle.
I just like seeing the next reply first because I tend to read almost everything
and so then I tend to recognize the quoted part anyway.
Although this isn't going to work out as well for forgotten posts I can still just
reread whatever was quoted after getting the idea of the follow-up.
Of course it must be such a personal preference I can't see anyone adhering
to a certain "netiquette" rule regarding this, which I think I've seen remarked
by others before too.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Melly wrote:
>
> I chop and change. Short replies I generally put the quote at the end.
> Longer replies I quote at the beginning. I'm certainly not consistent or
> particularily logical about it. Is there a standard netiquette?
>
> "Børge Berg-Olsen" <azo### [at] dodno> wrote in message
> news:391AB3E8.4A62A49A@dod.no...
> >
> > Btw, why don't you quote below original text?
yes, it is a standard nettiquette for it, see how silly my reply to your
post looks?
--
Børge Berg-Olsen
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+47 90 62 71 78 DoD#2101, DoDRT#017, NIC#015, PJ#006, OGM#007
azo### [at] dodno, Ducati M600 Ubesudlet: Aldri eid en J&%#PS.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And now it becomes ...
Bob Hughes wrote:
>
> I switch it around on rare occasions and do as you said here.
>
> "Tom Melly" <tom### [at] tomandluf9couk> wrote in message
news:391bc0f6$1@news.povray.org...
> | I chop and change. Short replies I generally put the quote at the end.
> | Longer replies I quote at the beginning. I'm certainly not consistent or
> | particularily logical about it. Is there a standard netiquette?
> |
> | "Børge Berg-Olsen" <azo### [at] dodno> wrote in message
> | news:391AB3E8.4A62A49A@dod.no...
> | >
> | > Btw, why don't you quote below original text?
>
> However, for the most part I usually let the quote go afterward of anything
> I say unless it seems I need to splice into the previous message someplace
> in the middle.
> I just like seeing the next reply first because I tend to read almost everything
> and so then I tend to recognize the quoted part anyway.
> Although this isn't going to work out as well for forgotten posts I can still just
> reread whatever was quoted after getting the idea of the follow-up.
> Of course it must be such a personal preference I can't see anyone adhering
> to a certain "netiquette" rule regarding this, which I think I've seen remarked
> by others before too.
even more silly!
--
Børge Berg-Olsen
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+47 90 62 71 78 DoD#2101, DoDRT#017, NIC#015, PJ#006, OGM#007
azo### [at] dodno, Ducati M600 Ubesudlet: Aldri eid en J&%#PS.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes wrote:
> Of course it must be such a personal preference I can't see anyone adhering
> to a certain "netiquette" rule regarding this, which I think I've seen remarked
> by others before too.
I have seen a general consensus favoring a reply after the quoted text.
It's even better if you only include the relevant portion of the quoted
text you are replying to (Just as my reply is structured). This way it
kind of reads an actual conversation.
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
My major complaint with that way has always been how it necessitates
paging down to see the reply on messages over a window-page in length.
I'm not saying the below-quote method is wrong, it's just about personal
preferences.
Even more so I know a reply can never be mistaken for anything else if placed
before the quoted message. If at the end it always seems to mix in with signatures.
Checking the group I'm in just now, going way OT :-) unless this is surgery on
message posts.
Bob
"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message news:391F83A6.A43A1BA4@pacbell.net...
|
| Bob Hughes wrote:
|
| > Of course it must be such a personal preference I can't see anyone adhering
| > to a certain "netiquette" rule regarding this, which I think I've seen remarked
| > by others before too.
|
| I have seen a general consensus favoring a reply after the quoted text.
| It's even better if you only include the relevant portion of the quoted
| text you are replying to (Just as my reply is structured). This way it
| kind of reads an actual conversation.
|
| --
| Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
| http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Not only has this thread gone off-topic - its gone off the subject too.
--
Mike
wk: mik### [at] pyxiscom www.pyxis.com
hm: mwe### [at] sciticom www.geocities.com/mikepweber
"Bob Hughes" <per### [at] aolcom?subject=PoV-News:> wrote in message
news:391fd1df@news.povray.org...
> My major complaint with that way has always been how it necessitates
> paging down to see the reply on messages over a window-page in length.
> I'm not saying the below-quote method is wrong, it's just about personal
> preferences.
> Even more so I know a reply can never be mistaken for anything else if
placed
> before the quoted message. If at the end it always seems to mix in with
signatures.
>
> Checking the group I'm in just now, going way OT :-) unless this is
surgery on
> message posts.
>
> Bob
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes wrote:
> Even more so I know a reply can never be mistaken for anything else if placed
> before the quoted message. If at the end it always seems to mix in with signatures.
That is why when replying I always take a few moments to edit out things
like sigs and signoff messages. That too is part of the quoting netiquette.
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
