 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
First, off, thank you, everybody, for your suggestions. I really appreciated
them. :)
Here's the latest version of the logo. I tried everybody's ideas, but only
got around to implementing the following changes:
a) Color-sheme
b) Slight changes in sizes
c) Slight change in rotation of the ellipse, to better mimic a real eye.
Once again, thank you everybody for the suggestions leading to the current
stage of the image.
I'm also providing a black and white version of it, so you can get a gander
at that, and I also added the text "POV-Ray" so you can see what it looks
like with it. It isn't actually part of the logo. It's only there to show
that the logo doesn't need it, it's simply a redundant complement to those
who know it, and it tells first-timers to what program it belongs.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'eye128.gif' (7 KB)
Download 'eye32.gif' (2 KB)
Download 'eyegs.gif' (2 KB)
Preview of image 'eye128.gif'
Preview of image 'eye32.gif'
Preview of image 'eyegs.gif'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The color scheme really helped. Now it's getting there!
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricy net> ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website: http:/www.faricy.net/~davidf/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>The color scheme really helped. Now it's getting there!
Woohoo! Uh... so what's keeping it from "being there"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Why an eye?
TonyB wrote:
>
> >The color scheme really helped. Now it's getting there!
>
> Woohoo! Uh... so what's keeping it from "being there"?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <39172e10@news.povray.org>, "TonyB"
<ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote:
> Here's the latest version of the logo. I tried everybody's ideas, but
> only got around to implementing the following changes:
>
> a) Color-sheme
> b) Slight changes in sizes
> c) Slight change in rotation of the ellipse, to better mimic a real eye.
>
> Once again, thank you everybody for the suggestions leading to the
> current stage of the image.
The color scheme on this one is much better, it doesn't look
water-related any more. :-)
It still looks like a hydrogen atom to me though, did you try the
torus-surrounding-sphere idea for the pupil and iris? You could make a
black(or electric blue) pupil, and a blue iris. The iris could be an
outline for the black and white version, maybe with radial lines.
And maybe red lightning emanating from the center, to represent the
bloodshot eyes we have after staying up too late tweaking settings. :-)
--
Christopher James Huff - Personal e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
TAG(Technical Assistance Group) e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
Personal Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
TAG Web page: http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <3917388B.5ED477CD@pilot.msu.edu>, Nick Portelli
<por### [at] pilotmsuedu> wrote:
> Why an eye?
Well, "POV" means "Persistence Of Vision"...
--
Christopher James Huff - Personal e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
TAG(Technical Assistance Group) e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
Personal Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
TAG Web page: http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TonyB wrote:
> Woohoo! Uh... so what's keeping it from "being there"?
Make it an actual eye in the center. And I made you a better BW version
:-)
I would have posted this earlier but I had another crash :-(
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website: http:/www.faricy.net/~davidf/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'eyebw.gif' (1 KB)
Preview of image 'eyebw.gif'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> skrev i meddelandet
news:39172e10@news.povray.org...
> Here's the latest version of the logo. I tried everybody's ideas, but only
> got around to implementing the following changes:
I really like this one, it's by far my first choice of all the logos I've
seen so far. I'm not sure what to improve, but I'm sure there's something,
so keep trying :-)
¤¤¤¤
¤ Sebastian Strand
¤ E-mail: the### [at] bigfootcom
¤ URL: http://www.zeb.f2s.com/
¤¤¤¤
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, this is the kind of logo I would vote for.Simplicity is there.
TonyB a écrit :
> First, off, thank you, everybody, for your suggestions. I really appreciated
> them. :)
>
> Here's the latest version of the logo. I tried everybody's ideas, but only
> got around to implementing the following changes:
>
> a) Color-sheme
> b) Slight changes in sizes
> c) Slight change in rotation of the ellipse, to better mimic a real eye.
>
> Once again, thank you everybody for the suggestions leading to the current
> stage of the image.
>
> I'm also providing a black and white version of it, so you can get a gander
> at that, and I also added the text "POV-Ray" so you can see what it looks
> like with it. It isn't actually part of the logo. It's only there to show
> that the logo doesn't need it, it's simply a redundant complement to those
> who know it, and it tells first-timers to what program it belongs.
>
> Name: eye128.gif
> eye128.gif Type: Paint Shop Pro Image
(application/x-unknown-content-type-PSP.Image)
> Encoding: x-uuencode
>
> Name: eye32.gif
> eye32.gif Type: Paint Shop Pro Image
(application/x-unknown-content-type-PSP.Image)
> Encoding: x-uuencode
>
> Name: eyegs.gif
> eyegs.gif Type: Paint Shop Pro Image
(application/x-unknown-content-type-PSP.Image)
> Encoding: x-uuencode
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Make it an actual eye in the center.
That would make it a little to complex. This is supposed to be simple.
>And I made you a better BW version :-)
Thank you.
>I would have posted this earlier but I had another crash :-(
Sounds like it's that time of the month again... to reinstall Windows, that
is!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>The color scheme on this one is much better, it doesn't look
>water-related any more. :-)
Praise the Lord, Chris Huff is happy!
>It still looks like a hydrogen atom to me though.
Doh!
>Did you try the torus-surrounding-sphere
>idea for the pupil and iris?
Yes, but good colors escaped me, so I forgot about it.
>You could make a
>black(or electric blue) pupil, and a blue iris. The iris could be an
>outline for the black and white version, maybe with radial lines.
Oh, so *now* you want blue? ;) It sounds like that would make it overly
complex.
>And maybe red lightning emanating from the center, to represent the
>bloodshot eyes we have after staying up too late tweaking settings. :-)
O... K... I don't think that's the image we want to show... this logo
represents an ideal situation, not reality. ;)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>I really like this one, it's by far my first choice of all the logos I've
>seen so far. I'm not sure what to improve, but I'm sure there's something,
>so keep trying :-)
Alright! :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Well, this is the kind of logo I would vote for. Simplicity is there.
This makes me feel good enough to dance! :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Maybe you could add some shadow to the iris ( as you did to the lettering)
to give more depth to the picture.
Fabien Hénon
TonyB a écrit :
> >Well, this is the kind of logo I would vote for. Simplicity is there.
>
> This makes me feel good enough to dance! :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <39174496@news.povray.org>, "TonyB"
<ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote:
> Praise the Lord, Chris Huff is happy!
Sorry if I was sounding picky...
> >Did you try the torus-surrounding-sphere
> >idea for the pupil and iris?
>
> Yes, but good colors escaped me, so I forgot about it.
I made an attempt, see the attached image. No black/white version yet,
though it would be pretty simple.
> >You could make a
> >black(or electric blue) pupil, and a blue iris. The iris could be an
> >outline for the black and white version, maybe with radial lines.
>
> Oh, so *now* you want blue? ;)
Well, not "sky blue" or "water blue", dark purplish electric blue.
Something to say "high tech", not "fresh, pure water". :-)
> It sounds like that would make it overly complex.
It would just be an additional circle in the black/white version, and
would make it look a lot more like an eye.
> >And maybe red lightning emanating from the center, to represent the
> >bloodshot eyes we have after staying up too late tweaking settings. :-)
>
> O... K... I don't think that's the image we want to show... this logo
> represents an ideal situation, not reality. ;)
:-)
--
Christopher James Huff - Personal e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
TAG(Technical Assistance Group) e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
Personal Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
TAG Web page: http://tag.povray.org/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'POV Logo.jpg' (14 KB)
Preview of image 'POV Logo.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Sorry if I was sounding picky...
It's OK.
>I made an attempt, see the attached image. No black/white version yet,
>though it would be pretty simple.
Hmmm... good colors. I'll modify mine. :)
>It would just be an additional circle in the black/white version, and
>would make it look a lot more like an eye.
It does.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Why an eye?
>
>Well, "POV" means "Persistence Of Vision"...
>
... and the camera might be thought of as an eye...
simen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Simen Kvaal
Subject: Re: "Eye" logo 2 (~14kau) - POV Logo.jpg (1/1)
Date: 9 May 2000 03:05:04
Message: <3917b8a0@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> >Did you try the torus-surrounding-sphere
>> >idea for the pupil and iris?
>>
>> Yes, but good colors escaped me, so I forgot about it.
>
>I made an attempt, see the attached image. No black/white version yet,
>though it would be pretty simple.
>
Hm.
IMO, it gets over-done. The logo looks good with just two elements. More
would corrupt it, especially at low-res. It sorta looks more like an eye,
but I find it somewhat too less stylized; it like loses some of its
easyness.
Oh, well.
Simen.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Greetings!
This effect is a supplement to the "grep 'logo' /etc/collectedWisdom"
thread on povray.general.
Premise: Rather than a given logo with a set colour scheme, why not an
_effect_ which can be bundled in an .inc and rendered into any scene?
All due credit to TonyB.
Henry.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'closeUp.jpg' (4 KB)
Download 'infinity.jpg' (38 KB)
Preview of image 'closeUp.jpg'
Preview of image 'infinity.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Henry" <htp### [at] maccom> wrote :
>
> Premise: Rather than a given logo with a set colour scheme, why not an
> _effect_ which can be bundled in an .inc and rendered into any scene?
>
That's what I was trying to say all along. -Something- that can be
subtly introduced to each scene that will tip people off as to what they are
looking at...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>All due credit to TonyB.
Wow, and on one of my images, too. :) It looks nice, doesn't it?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I concur, but did you have to use such a example image when my
eyes are already feeling the hours of sleeplessness? X-}
Bob
"Bill DeWitt" <the### [at] earthlinknet> wrote in message
news:3918160e$1@news.povray.org...
|
| "Henry" <htp### [at] maccom> wrote :
| >
| > Premise: Rather than a given logo with a set colour scheme, why not an
| > _effect_ which can be bundled in an .inc and rendered into any scene?
| >
|
| That's what I was trying to say all along. -Something- that can be
| subtly introduced to each scene that will tip people off as to what they are
| looking at...
|
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Would you mind rendering one of these in black and white with some phong on
the black? I'm thinking that would look best with this logo, I'm but not
sure.
--
Dan D.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hey I like this one. One thing though, it looks like the C must mean
something
"TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote in message
news:39172e10@news.povray.org...
> First, off, thank you, everybody, for your suggestions. I really
appreciated
> them. :)
>
> Here's the latest version of the logo. I tried everybody's ideas, but only
> got around to implementing the following changes:
>
> a) Color-sheme
> b) Slight changes in sizes
> c) Slight change in rotation of the ellipse, to better mimic a real eye.
>
> Once again, thank you everybody for the suggestions leading to the current
> stage of the image.
>
> I'm also providing a black and white version of it, so you can get a
gander
> at that, and I also added the text "POV-Ray" so you can see what it looks
> like with it. It isn't actually part of the logo. It's only there to show
> that the logo doesn't need it, it's simply a redundant complement to those
> who know it, and it tells first-timers to what program it belongs.
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 8 May 2000 16:11:04 -0400, "TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet>
wrote:
>First, off, thank you, everybody, for your suggestions. I really appreciated
>them. :)
This is by far the best one that I have seen here! To be quite honest,
I was getting pretty sick of logos, and none of them seemed
appropriate for use - until now. This one is perfect. Can someone
announce a winner please? :)
I have even seen some of your later variations, created for Chris Huff
I believe, and this one is still better by far. I've attached a
slightly different black and white version to this message. I simply
converted your full color file to black and white, without dithering,
and this is what I got. I like it a bit better than your black and
white variation. This one still has highlights visible. Let me know
what you think of it.
Later,
Glen Berry
( Remove the "7" from 7no### [at] ezwvcom to email me. )
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'eye128_gb.jpg' (6 KB)
Preview of image 'eye128_gb.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 08 May 2000 17:01:16 -0500, Chris Huff
<chr### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>It still looks like a hydrogen atom to me though,
I think you're the only one saying this. I never thought "hydrogen
atom" when I saw it, even though I *do* understand why you might say
that.
I appears that creating a logo everyone really likes will be only
slightly easier than achieving a sustainable cold fusion reaction.
:)
Later,
Glen Berry
( Remove the "7" from 7no### [at] ezwvcom to email me. )
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 8 May 2000 16:27:59 -0400, "TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet>
wrote:
>>The color scheme really helped. Now it's getting there!
>
>Woohoo! Uh... so what's keeping it from "being there"?
As far as I'm concerned, it *is* there.
( Remove the "7" from 7no### [at] ezwvcom to email me. )
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I *knew* someone would comment about that!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>This one is perfect. Can someone
>announce a winner please? :)
Aw, c'mon, don't exaggerate. I'm sure that there might be a better one out
there. (Please don't post it, anyone.) ;)
>I have even seen some of your later variations, created for Chris Huff
>I believe, and this one is still better by far.
Like I said, this is one variation, the other is another. It's up to you
guys to decide where this goes.
>I've attached a
>slightly different black and white version to this message.
>I like it a bit better than your black and
>white variation. This one still has highlights visible.
It does look better. I've been extracting my b&w versions from the inverse
of the alpha channel. I'll stop doing that now. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote in message
news:3918a5be@news.povray.org...
> >This one is perfect. Can someone
> >announce a winner please? :)
>
> Aw, c'mon, don't exaggerate. I'm sure that there might be a better one out
> there. (Please don't post it, anyone.) ;)
I was starting to worry about this too. With all the attention given
this one logo, what will those people who have been working quietly on the
side be thinking. Perhaps the best logo will never be posted because it's
author thinks that a decision has already been made.
I can't see anyway around it since we all want comments on our work and
we all want to comment on work we like. But I think that announcements of
preference should wait until we at least have submission rules.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
