POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : logo/opol Server Time
2 Oct 2024 14:12:31 EDT (-0400)
  logo/opol (Message 4 to 13 of 13)  
<<< Previous 3 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Paul Vanukoff
Subject: Re: logo/opol
Date: 6 May 2000 09:21:25
Message: <39141c55$1@news.povray.org>
Actually, it looks like he is using normal reflection here, no tricks except
for the clever main object design.

"TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote in message
news:391349d1@news.povray.org...
> no_image, no_reflection? Creative. :)
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill DeWitt
Subject: Re: logo/opol
Date: 6 May 2000 09:30:18
Message: <39141e6a@news.povray.org>
See, I wondered what he was talking about.

    Yes it is just a spline object and it's reflection. Here are two of the
objects. The  object needs some work, but the concept is there.

    One of the nice things about a real POV object is that it can be tweaked
whereas a finished graphic is pretty much done.

"Paul Vanukoff" <van### [at] primenetcom> wrote in message
news:39141c55$1@news.povray.org...
> Actually, it looks like he is using normal reflection here, no tricks
except
> for the clever main object design.
>
> "TonyB" <ben### [at] panamac-comnet> wrote in message
> news:391349d1@news.povray.org...
> > no_image, no_reflection? Creative. :)
> >
> >
>
>


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'povlogomirror2.jpg' (14 KB)

Preview of image 'povlogomirror2.jpg'
povlogomirror2.jpg


 

From: TonyB
Subject: Re: logo/opol
Date: 6 May 2000 13:41:38
Message: <39145952@news.povray.org>
Upon closer inspection I have realized that it is even more creative than I
originally thought. :)


Post a reply to this message

From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: logo/opol
Date: 6 May 2000 17:15:37
Message: <39148b79@news.povray.org>
I like.

Bob


Post a reply to this message

From: Rick [Kitty5]
Subject: Re: logo/opol
Date: 6 May 2000 20:18:38
Message: <3914b65e@news.povray.org>
> I am sure someone has done this before and probably better, but it might
be
> a direction to go towards...?

that is a very cool effect, again, maybe not logo material, but there is
definatly a concept there

Rick


Post a reply to this message

From: Peter Popov
Subject: Re: logo/opol
Date: 6 May 2000 20:23:24
Message: <8od9hssfka8egfhg01v9jlgbj9ajun58d0@4ax.com>
On Fri, 5 May 2000 17:21:17 -0400, "Bill DeWitt"
<the### [at] earthlinknet> wrote:

>I am sure someone has done this before and probably better, but it might be
>a direction to go towards...?

I praise Your creativity, Sir!


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg


Post a reply to this message

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: logo/opol
Date: 7 May 2000 00:05:25
Message: <3914EADC.7E84B4A6@faricy.net>
It took me a second to figure it out. Cool! Although I don't really know what
kind of variations you could do at a low resolution.

--
David Fontaine     <dav### [at] faricynet>    ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website: http:/www.faricy.net/~davidf/


Post a reply to this message

From: Rick [Kitty5]
Subject: Re: logo/opol
Date: 7 May 2000 10:32:22
Message: <39157e76@news.povray.org>
> Upon closer inspection I have realized that it is even more creative than
I
> originally thought. :)

i love it, its so damn clever!, no damn good for a static logo, be good for
an into animation (like the kind you see at the front of vid games)

Rick


Post a reply to this message

From: TonyB
Subject: Re: logo/opol
Date: 7 May 2000 15:50:55
Message: <3915c91f@news.povray.org>
>i love it, its so damn clever!, no damn good for a static logo, be good for
>an into animation (like the kind you see at the front of vid games)


I think those are called "intro" videos. :)


Post a reply to this message

From: Lewis
Subject: Re: logo/opol
Date: 10 May 2000 17:10:09
Message: <3919DD44.ADB58265@netvision.net.il>
wow!
This is the most original idea i have seen so far.
I'm amazed.
The only problem is that It's hard to use as a logo...

Bill DeWitt wrote:
> 
> I am sure someone has done this before and probably better, but it might be
> a direction to go towards...?
> 
>  [Image]


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 3 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.