 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Peter Popov wrote:
> Name: reply.gif
That's what I like about this news server. You get a better class of
wise asses here than you do on USENET.
<g>
--
Ken Tyler - 1400+ POV-Ray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 25 Apr 2000 17:58:56 -0700, Ken <tyl### [at] pacbell net> wrote:
>That's what I like about this news server. You get a better class of
>wise asses here than you do on USENET.
>
><g>
You know, you're the first one to call me that since el gefe back in
high-school (while giving me my fourth last warning in four years :)
), but since you were also the first person to ever address me as
"Sir" you are forgiven :)
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
See my .sig file
Bryan Valencia wrote:
>
> ROFL!
>
> Peter Popov wrote:
>
> > Name: reply.gif
> > reply.gif Type: GIF Image (image/gif)
> > Encoding: base64
>
> --
> Bryan Valencia
> Software Services - Making Windows Scream
> http://www.209software.com
> mailto:bry### [at] 209softwarecom
>
--
Francois Labreque | //\\ Wear an ASCII ribbon!
flabreq | || ||
@ | \\// Support the campain
attglobal.net \\ against HTML e-mail!
//\\
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sorry, I should have said that it is an animation, that will probably have
over 2000 frames when finished. It certainly doesn't render that slow right
now, but I'm budgeting about 1-3 minutes per frame when it is finished,
which would put the render time at several nights.
Andrew C
>
> What is your scene file composed of?!? Does it have a huge number of
> transparent surfaces, blurred reflections, radiosity with high recursion
> levels, etc?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Andrew Clinton wrote in message <39065A14.46445BAF@ibm.net>...
>
>Sorry, I should have said that it is an animation, that will probably have
>over 2000 frames when finished. It certainly doesn't render that slow
right
>now, but I'm budgeting about 1-3 minutes per frame when it is finished,
>which would put the render time at several nights.
The original timeline for my IRTC "Robots" animation was to spend a thousand
hours rendering the 1008 frame animation.
Then the MegaPOV radiosity speedups came along, and it only took 75 hours to
render using a 400MHz AMD K6-2 and three 450MHz Pentium IIs.
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <chrishuff_99-1347B6.16262325042000@news.povray.org>, Chris
Huff <chr### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>It would be possible to make a raytracing "preview mode" with no
>lighting and simplified shading, and maybe simple depth cuing, maybe
>only rendering the bounding shapes, but this is really not very
>necessary with the quality level adjustment available.
I have found that turning on viewing of bounding boxes in Mac POV (Mega
and, I think, official) helps a lot. It doesn't show the 3-d bounding
box, just the 2-d, but it helps for long renders.
Jerry
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bryan Valencia wrote:
>
> Ok, there's official POV that can take a day to render a complex
> scene...
> ...and there's Mega POV which has lots of cool stuff, but takes a week
> to render a complex scene.
>
> I need milli-POV which is optimized for speed and can render a complex
> scene in 10 minutes.
>
> --
> Bryan Valencia
> Software Services - Making Windows Scream
> http://www.209software.com
> mailto:bry### [at] 209softwarecom
BTW, where is the image ... questionmark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Francois Labreque wrote:
> See my .sig file
[snip]
> --
> Francois Labreque | //\\ Wear an ASCII ribbon!
> flabreq | || ||
> @ | \\// Support the campain
> attglobal.net \\ against HTML e-mail!
> //\\
Only problem, this isn't e-mail ;)
--
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> ICQ 55354965
Please visit my website: http:/www.faricy.net/~davidf/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I just rendered the good old Fish13 (standard POV-scene file), resolution
1024,768, AA 0.3 on a PIII-600 MHZ, 256 MB-sdram, 20 GB Hard-disk(drive) and
these were the results:
Time for Parse: 0 hours 0 minutes 1.0 seconds (1 seconds)
Time for Trace: 0 hours 3 minutes 12.0 seconds (192 seconds)
Total Time: 0 hours, 3 minutes 13.0 seconds (193 seconds)
grtz, Bugs74
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bugs74 wrote:
>
> I just rendered the good old Fish13 (standard POV-scene file), resolution
> 1024,768, AA 0.3 on a PIII-600 MHZ, 256 MB-sdram, 20 GB Hard-disk(drive) and
> these were the results:
>
> Time for Parse: 0 hours 0 minutes 1.0 seconds (1 seconds)
> Time for Trace: 0 hours 3 minutes 12.0 seconds (192 seconds)
> Total Time: 0 hours, 3 minutes 13.0 seconds (193 seconds)
>
> grtz, Bugs74
On a 650Mhz Athlon with 128MB ram, normal render priority, Netscape
downloading this newsgroup, SETI@Home looking for aliens and a CD
playing in the background I get:
Time for Parse: 0 hours 0 minutes 1.0 seconds (1 seconds)
Time for Trace: 0 hours 2 minutes 9.0 seconds (129 seconds)
Total Time: 0 hours, 2 minutes 10.0 seconds (130 seconds)
Drool.
Follow-ups set to p.o-t.
--
Francois Labreque | Unfortunately, there's no such thing as a snooze
flabreq | button on a cat who wants breakfast.
@ | - Unattributed quote from rec.humor.funny
attglobal.net
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
