POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Rombot Server Time
20 Oct 2026 08:23:01 EDT (-0400)
  Rombot (Message 1 to 23 of 23)  
From: Chris Spencer
Subject: Rombot
Date: 8 Apr 2000 16:42:27
Message: <38ef99b3@news.povray.org>
Stands for remotely operated maintenance robot...but that's not 
important.  It's a little exercise on modeling and textures.  I still 
don't think I captured that gleam in the "eyes"...  Comments good or 
otherwise appreciated.

-Chris-


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'iso-8859-1' (1 KB)

From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 8 Apr 2000 18:29:05
Message: <38efb2b1@news.povray.org>
If you didn't then you at least made them obvious  :-)
This sort of black and white image with only the blue standing out makes for a
different look.
Is there anything behind the blue orbs?  If not maybe it could help to have
something pupil- or iris-like there.  Not eyes I guess, just something there.

Bob

"Chris Spencer" <chr### [at] bluelectrodecom> wrote in message
news:38ef99b3@news.povray.org...
  I still don't think I captured that gleam in the "eyes"...


Post a reply to this message

From: Lt  Kettch
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 8 Apr 2000 18:39:50
Message: <38EFACF8.173DEF5E@aol.com>
Did you get the idea from a star trek next generation episode? they had
robots for the same purpose.

Chris Spencer wrote:

> Stands for remotely operated maintenance robot...but that's not
> important.  It's a little exercise on modeling and textures.  I still
> don't think I captured that gleam in the "eyes"...  Comments good or
> otherwise appreciated. -Chris-

--
ÐÏࡱá


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'us-ascii' (1 KB) Download 'rombot01.jpg' (15 KB)

Preview of image 'rombot01.jpg'
rombot01.jpg


 

From: Lt  Kettch
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 8 Apr 2000 18:40:03
Message: <38EFAD02.735762EE@aol.com>
Did you get the idea from a star trek next generation episode? they had
robots for the same purpose.

Chris Spencer wrote:

> Stands for remotely operated maintenance robot...but that's not
> important.  It's a little exercise on modeling and textures.  I still
> don't think I captured that gleam in the "eyes"...  Comments good or
> otherwise appreciated. -Chris-

--
ÐÏࡱá


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'us-ascii' (1 KB) Download 'rombot01.jpg' (15 KB)

Preview of image 'rombot01.jpg'
rombot01.jpg


 

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 8 Apr 2000 20:13:06
Message: <38EFCAC6.E32D30FC@faricy.net>
All that gray with just a little blue adds an interesting touch.
(Hmm, looks like my NS window... hehe)

Sorry if I asked this before, but what do you use to post? (it was HTML)

--
___     _______________________________________________
 | \     |_          <dav### [at] faricynet> <ICQ 55354965>
 |_/avid |ontaine        http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/

"The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad." -Dali


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris S 
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 8 Apr 2000 20:19:29
Message: <38efcc91@news.povray.org>
Did you get the idea from a star trek next generation episode? they had
robots for the same purpose.
>Stands for remotely operated maintenance robot...but that's not important.
It's a little exercise on modeling and textures.  I still don't think I
captured that gleam in >the "eyes"...  Comments good or otherwise
appreciated. -Chris- [clipped image]

Nope, strictly coincidental.  In fact, I'm somewhat a trekkie and I have no
idea what your talking about...

-Chris-


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris S 
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 8 Apr 2000 20:20:20
Message: <38efccc4$1@news.povray.org>
Did you get the idea from a star trek next generation episode? they had
robots for the same purpose.
>Stands for remotely operated maintenance robot...but that's not important.
It's a little exercise on modeling and textures.  I still don't think I
captured that gleam in >the "eyes"...  Comments good or otherwise
appreciated. -Chris-

Again, no.  Strictly coincidental.

-Chris-


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris S 
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 8 Apr 2000 20:25:37
Message: <38efce01@news.povray.org>
> If you didn't then you at least made them obvious  :-)
> This sort of black and white image with only the blue standing out makes
for a
> different look.
> Is there anything behind the blue orbs?  If not maybe it could help to
have
> something pupil- or iris-like there.  Not eyes I guess, just something
there.
>
> Bob
>
> "Chris Spencer" <chr### [at] bluelectrodecom> wrote in message
> news:38ef99b3@news.povray.org...
>   I still don't think I captured that gleam in the "eyes"...

Well,  I had to have some distinguishing mark "labeled" the front of the
bot.  I was going for an H.E. Day'ish glowing media effect in the eyes, but
it turned out looking more like a jellybean/marble.  Still, not bad for my
first try at hand-coded media.  Hmmm...something pupil-like, interesting.

-Chris-


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris S 
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 8 Apr 2000 20:26:46
Message: <38efce46@news.povray.org>
> All that gray with just a little blue adds an interesting touch.
> (Hmm, looks like my NS window... hehe)
>
> Sorry if I asked this before, but what do you use to post? (it was HTML)

MS Outlook Express, with Rich HTML...did that cause a problem in the post?
It looks ok from this end...

-Chris-


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris S 
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 8 Apr 2000 20:30:16
Message: <38efcf18@news.povray.org>
> All that gray with just a little blue adds an interesting touch.
> (Hmm, looks like my NS window... hehe)
>
> Sorry if I asked this before, but what do you use to post? (it was HTML)

BTW, if I had rendered at a higher resolution, you'd might actually see some
red ;)  So are you insinuating the need for more color or contrast?

-Chris-


Post a reply to this message

From: Ken
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 8 Apr 2000 21:28:34
Message: <38EFDCEE.C573FAA6@pacbell.net>
"Chris S." wrote:
> 
> > All that gray with just a little blue adds an interesting touch.
> > (Hmm, looks like my NS window... hehe)
> >
> > Sorry if I asked this before, but what do you use to post? (it was HTML)
> 
> MS Outlook Express, with Rich HTML...did that cause a problem in the post?
> It looks ok from this end...

As part of a server policy we prefer that you post in plain text when visiting
this news server. The relevant part of the news server policy is stated below

1.) This has been mentioned before in other announcements on this
    news server but we would appreciate it if you do not post your
    messages in HTML format. Many of our visitors do not have HTML
    compliant news readers. Also, HTML messages consume more server
    resources than do plain text messages. We do not expire messages
    in every group on this server and HTML posts are a luxury we
    cannot support.


Thanks,

Ken Tyler


Post a reply to this message

From: H E  Day
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 8 Apr 2000 21:47:43
Message: <38EFE0BD.D665F18E@fci.net>
Wow!  That's cool!  Send me the source-code, please!
For the eyes, try a high phong number 2 or above.

--
H.E. Day


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris S 
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 8 Apr 2000 23:07:17
Message: <38eff3e5$1@news.povray.org>
> "Chris S." wrote:
> >
> > > All that gray with just a little blue adds an interesting touch.
> > > (Hmm, looks like my NS window... hehe)
> > >
> > > Sorry if I asked this before, but what do you use to post? (it was
HTML)
> >
> > MS Outlook Express, with Rich HTML...did that cause a problem in the
post?
> > It looks ok from this end...
>
> As part of a server policy we prefer that you post in plain text when
visiting
> this news server. The relevant part of the news server policy is stated
below
>
> 1.) This has been mentioned before in other announcements on this
>     news server but we would appreciate it if you do not post your
>     messages in HTML format. Many of our visitors do not have HTML
>     compliant news readers. Also, HTML messages consume more server
>     resources than do plain text messages. We do not expire messages
>     in every group on this server and HTML posts are a luxury we
>     cannot support.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ken Tyler

Gotcha

-Chris-


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris S 
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 8 Apr 2000 23:20:05
Message: <38eff6e5$1@news.povray.org>
> Wow!  That's cool!  Send me the source-code, please!
> For the eyes, try a high phong number 2 or above.
>
> --
> H.E. Day

:::Stands back:::  Seriously?  No offense, but that's like the mountain
swaying to the wind, if you'll forgive my analogy.  Drop me a line if your
really interested; I'd be more than happy.  Anyway, it's somewhat
large...textures, models or both?

By the way, I must thank you for opening my eyes to a "higher" understanding
or textures and modeling.  Your last source post intrigued me to the point
of browsing MegaPov's help file and studying its abilities in earnest.
There's a lot to learn, but I've got all the time in the world...

-Chris-


Post a reply to this message

From: Mr  Art
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 8 Apr 2000 23:49:45
Message: <38EFEFF0.5612623E@gci.net>
There is/was an episode of TNG that had a scientist
trying to generate power from orbit. She required
three semi self aware robots to perform matintance
in the small access tubes. The power project was a
bust but the robots were declared another life form.

"Chris S." wrote:
> 
> Did you get the idea from a star trek next generation episode? they had
> robots for the same purpose.
> >Stands for remotely operated maintenance robot...but that's not important.
> It's a little exercise on modeling and textures.  I still don't think I
> captured that gleam in >the "eyes"...  Comments good or otherwise
> appreciated. -Chris- [clipped image]
> 
> Nope, strictly coincidental.  In fact, I'm somewhat a trekkie and I have no
> idea what your talking about...
> 
> -Chris-


Post a reply to this message

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 9 Apr 2000 00:06:20
Message: <38F00172.72B5F79C@faricy.net>
"Chris S." wrote:

> > All that gray with just a little blue adds an interesting touch.
> > (Hmm, looks like my NS window... hehe)
> >
> > Sorry if I asked this before, but what do you use to post? (it was HTML)
>
> BTW, if I had rendered at a higher resolution, you'd might actually see some
> red ;)  So are you insinuating the need for more color or contrast?

Neither :-)

--
___     _______________________________________________
 | \     |_          <dav### [at] faricynet> <ICQ 55354965>
 |_/avid |ontaine        http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/

"The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad." -Dali


Post a reply to this message

From: H E  Day
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 9 Apr 2000 00:09:58
Message: <38F00212.A6A82BF6@fci.net>
> :::Stands back:::  Seriously?

Yup.  I like it.  It does need to be rendered at a higher res, however.

>  Drop me a line if your
> really interested; I'd be more than happy.  Anyway, it's somewhat
> large...textures, models or both?

Hmmm...  Could you e-mail me the model and decreased textures? I assume you used
blobs and csg, so the .pov files won't be very large.

> By the way, I must thank you for opening my eyes to a "higher" understanding
> or textures and modeling.  Your last source post intrigued me to the point
> of browsing MegaPov's help file and studying its abilities in earnest.
> There's a lot to learn, but I've got all the time in the world...

Gee, what do you say to something like this? Umm.  Glad I could help.

--
H.E. Day


Post a reply to this message

From: Charles Krause
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 9 Apr 2000 00:46:14
Message: <38f00b16@news.povray.org>
>> By the way, I must thank you for opening my eyes to a "higher"
understanding
>> or textures and modeling.  Your last source post intrigued me to the
point
>> of browsing MegaPov's help file and studying its abilities in earnest.
>> There's a lot to learn, but I've got all the time in the world...
>
>Gee, what do you say to something like this? Umm.  Glad I could help.
>
>--
>H.E. Day
>


He's not the only one :) I saw some of the work you were producing, and
realized "Damn! This program can do some wicked stuff if one knows how!".
While I might not have your native artistic ability, it HAS prompted me to
sit down with 'stack o' documentation' and finally try to learn how to use
this raytracer _properly_ rather than just tinker with it.


Post a reply to this message

From: Mark Wagner
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 9 Apr 2000 02:05:48
Message: <38f01dbc@news.povray.org>
Ken wrote in message <38EFDCEE.C573FAA6@pacbell.net>...
>As part of a server policy we prefer that you post in plain text when
visiting
>this news server. The relevant part of the news server policy is stated
below
>
>1.) This has been mentioned before in other announcements on this
>    news server but we would appreciate it if you do not post your
>    messages in HTML format. Many of our visitors do not have HTML
>    compliant news readers. Also, HTML messages consume more server
>    resources than do plain text messages. We do not expire messages
>    in every group on this server and HTML posts are a luxury we
>    cannot support.


Additionally, with HTML posting it is easier for someone to accidentally
include the image in their reply to the post, resulting in two or three
additional messages each containing a copy of the image.

Mark


Post a reply to this message

From: Ken
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 9 Apr 2000 02:32:00
Message: <38F02405.645A8273@pacbell.net>
Mark Wagner wrote:

> Additionally, with HTML posting it is easier for someone to accidentally
> include the image in their reply to the post, resulting in two or three
> additional messages each containing a copy of the image.

You mean like in this thread :)

-- 
Ken Tyler -  1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris Huff
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 9 Apr 2000 13:30:59
Message: <chrishuff_99-34E35C.12333309042000@news.povray.org>
In article <38EFE0BD.D665F18E@fci.net>, Pov### [at] aolcom wrote:

> For the eyes, try a high phong number 2 or above.

Also try either a high brilliance(3-5 or more) or a negative brilliance.

-- 
Christopher James Huff - Personal e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
TAG(Technical Assistance Group) e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/


Post a reply to this message

From: Francois Labreque
Subject: Re: Rombot
Date: 9 Apr 2000 19:45:07
Message: <38F11583.F6DB9E3E@attglobal.net>
Chris Huff wrote:
> 
> In article <38EFE0BD.D665F18E@fci.net>, Pov### [at] aolcom wrote:
> 
> > For the eyes, try a high phong number 2 or above.
> 
> Also try either a high brilliance(3-5 or more) or a negative brilliance.

Now I'm curious.  Negative brilliance?  What does it do?  Suck in
light?  I must try that.

-- 
Francois Labreque | Rimmer: "Let's go to red alert!"
     flabreq      | Kryten: "Are you sure, Sir?  You realize it
        @         |          actually means changing the bulb!"
  attglobal.net


Post a reply to this message

From: Chris Huff
Subject: Re: Rombot - brillianceSphere.jpg (1/1)
Date: 9 Apr 2000 21:20:43
Message: <chrishuff_99-33BA94.20230309042000@news.povray.org>
In article <38F11583.F6DB9E3E@attglobal.net>, fla### [at] attglobalnet 
wrote:

> Now I'm curious.  Negative brilliance?  What does it do?  Suck in
> light?  I must try that.

Sort of...here is an image that demonstrates the effects of brilliance.
Values go like this:
Top row: -50 to 50 in increments of 10
Second from top row: -25 to 25 in increments of 5
Middle row: -5 to 5 in increments of 1
Middle row: -1 to 1 in increments of 0.2
Middle row: -0.5 to 0.5 in increments of 0.1

The center column, which is easily identifiable, has a brilliance of 0.

-- 
Christopher James Huff - Personal e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
TAG(Technical Assistance Group) e-mail: chr### [at] tagpovrayorg
Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'brillianceSphere.jpg' (21 KB)

Preview of image 'brillianceSphere.jpg'
brillianceSphere.jpg


 

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.