 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sorry, Tesla's studies. Some Russian or German scientist.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks like that's what the real ones do as well. Zap anything nearby.
--
Dan D.
"Through the Eye of a Needle"
http://fbox.vt.edu/D/ddombrow/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Try this for a link
http://www.neuronet.pitt.edu/~bogdan/tesla/index.htm
"Lt. Kettch" wrote:
>
> Sorry, Tesla's studies. Some Russian or German scientist.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Lt. Kettch" wrote:
>
> Two things, One: The Tesla Coil is based on Tesla electricity studies. its sends
> a bolt of Lightning into its target. How they aim, I have no clue. If this plain
> electricity interferes with radar, I don't know. Two: Hey, I'm going by what I
> see in the game! Its not MY fault if they mess up.
Tesla coils do indeed generate broad band noise. I have medium sized unit
here at home and it wreaks havoc on local televisions, radios, and cell
phones when I turn it on.
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Um, at what range?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Lt. Kettch" wrote:
>
> Um, at what range?
Here at home the disruption is near 100%. I would suspect that it effects
cell phone operation for up to 100 ft, television reception for up to 100
yards, and AM radio reception for up to a mile but I am just guessing. I
have heard similar reports from discussions in the sci.electronics groups.
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote:
>
> "Lt. Kettch" wrote:
> >
> > Um, at what range?
>
> Here at home the disruption is near 100%. I would suspect that it effects
> cell phone operation for up to 100 ft, television reception for up to 100
> yards, and AM radio reception for up to a mile but I am just guessing. I
> have heard similar reports from discussions in the sci.electronics groups.
What I would like to know if there exist a device wich you can carry and
wich is hidden, and then fry cellphones of people talking loudly about
very private things in public. It has to be directional so one would
have to aim it at the abuser.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+47 90 62 71 78 DoD#2101, NIC#015, Ducati M600, PJ#006, OGM#007
azo### [at] dod no, Ubesudlet: Aldri eid en J&%#PS.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, in the (second?) expansion pack, they have the tesla trooper who carry's a
mini tesl coil on his back...
> Ken wrote:
> >
> > "Lt. Kettch" wrote:
> > >
> > > Um, at what range?
> >
> > Here at home the disruption is near 100%. I would suspect that it effects
> > cell phone operation for up to 100 ft, television reception for up to 100
> > yards, and AM radio reception for up to a mile but I am just guessing. I
> > have heard similar reports from discussions in the sci.electronics groups.
>
> What I would like to know if there exist a device wich you can carry and
> wich is hidden, and then fry cellphones of people talking loudly about
> very private things in public. It has to be directional so one would
> have to aim it at the abuser.
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> +47 90 62 71 78 DoD#2101, NIC#015, Ducati M600, PJ#006, OGM#007
> azo### [at] dodno, Ubesudlet: Aldri eid en J&%#PS.
--
"Yub-Yub!" Lt. Kettch
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> What I would like to know if there exist a device wich you can carry and
> wich is hidden, and then fry cellphones of people talking loudly about
> very private things in public. It has to be directional so one would
> have to aim it at the abuser.
This is drifting off-topic for this group but if you can develop a large
enough electromagnetic pulse you can fry just about any piece of electronic
that is not radiation hardened. It wouldn't be cheap and it would require
a signifigant amount of development capitol.
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>
>This is drifting off-topic for this group but if you can develop a large
>enough electromagnetic pulse you can fry just about any piece of electronic
>that is not radiation hardened. It wouldn't be cheap and it would require
>a signifigant amount of development capitol.
>
>--
>Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
>http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Ok - now REALLY off topic, but yes.
The U.S. military did some theoretical studies into the use of high altitude
nuclear weapons that were designed to dump most of their energy into a groud
directed electromagnetic pulse. The purpose would be to burn out most or all
electronic equipment in a LARGE area.
Of course, most sensitive military electronic systems are housed in faraday
cages, which negates this kind of attack - but most financial systems are
NOT protected in this manner.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
