POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Red Alert 2 Server Time
2 Oct 2024 22:27:48 EDT (-0400)
  Red Alert 2 (Message 11 to 15 of 15)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Ken
Subject: Re: Red Alert 2
Date: 8 Apr 2000 21:04:11
Message: <38EFD735.E49B2241@pacbell.net>
"Lt. Kettch" wrote:
> 
> Um, at what range?

Here at home the disruption is near 100%. I would suspect that it effects
cell phone operation for up to 100 ft, television reception for up to 100
yards, and AM radio reception for up to a mile but I am just guessing. I
have heard similar reports from discussions in the sci.electronics groups.

-- 
Ken Tyler -  1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/


Post a reply to this message

From: Børge Berg-Olsen
Subject: Re: Red Alert 2
Date: 9 Apr 2000 15:39:08
Message: <38F0DC19.FA0D12D@dod.no>
Ken wrote:
> 
> "Lt. Kettch" wrote:
> >
> > Um, at what range?
> 
> Here at home the disruption is near 100%. I would suspect that it effects
> cell phone operation for up to 100 ft, television reception for up to 100
> yards, and AM radio reception for up to a mile but I am just guessing. I
> have heard similar reports from discussions in the sci.electronics groups.

What I would like to know if there exist a device wich you can carry and
wich is hidden, and then fry cellphones of people talking loudly about
very private things in public. It has to be directional so one would
have to aim it at the abuser. 

-- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
  +47 90 62 71 78        DoD#2101, NIC#015, Ducati M600, PJ#006, OGM#007
  azo### [at] dodno, Ubesudlet: Aldri eid en J&%#PS.


Post a reply to this message

From: Lt  Kettch
Subject: Re: Red Alert 2
Date: 9 Apr 2000 17:18:05
Message: <38F0EB55.37226DC2@aol.com>
Well, in the (second?) expansion pack, they have the tesla trooper who carry's a
mini tesl coil on his back...



> Ken wrote:
> >
> > "Lt. Kettch" wrote:
> > >
> > > Um, at what range?
> >
> > Here at home the disruption is near 100%. I would suspect that it effects
> > cell phone operation for up to 100 ft, television reception for up to 100
> > yards, and AM radio reception for up to a mile but I am just guessing. I
> > have heard similar reports from discussions in the sci.electronics groups.
>
> What I would like to know if there exist a device wich you can carry and
> wich is hidden, and then fry cellphones of people talking loudly about
> very private things in public. It has to be directional so one would
> have to aim it at the abuser.
>
> --

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   +47 90 62 71 78        DoD#2101, NIC#015, Ducati M600, PJ#006, OGM#007
>   azo### [at] dodno, Ubesudlet: Aldri eid en J&%#PS.

--
"Yub-Yub!" Lt. Kettch


Post a reply to this message

From: Ken
Subject: Re: Red Alert 2
Date: 9 Apr 2000 21:52:02
Message: <38F133ED.A5D57B01@pacbell.net>


> What I would like to know if there exist a device wich you can carry and
> wich is hidden, and then fry cellphones of people talking loudly about
> very private things in public. It has to be directional so one would
> have to aim it at the abuser.

This is drifting off-topic for this group but if you can develop a large
enough electromagnetic pulse you can fry just about any piece of electronic
that is not radiation hardened. It wouldn't be cheap and it would require
a signifigant amount of development capitol.

-- 
Ken Tyler -  1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/


Post a reply to this message

From: Charles Krause
Subject: Re: Red Alert 2
Date: 9 Apr 2000 22:01:52
Message: <38f13610$1@news.povray.org>
>
>This is drifting off-topic for this group but if you can develop a large
>enough electromagnetic pulse you can fry just about any piece of electronic
>that is not radiation hardened. It wouldn't be cheap and it would require
>a signifigant amount of development capitol.
>
>--
>Ken Tyler -  1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
>http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/


Ok - now REALLY off topic, but yes.

The U.S. military did some theoretical studies into the use of high altitude
nuclear weapons that were designed to dump most of their energy into a groud
directed electromagnetic pulse. The purpose would be to burn out most or all
electronic equipment in a LARGE area.

Of course, most sensitive military electronic systems are housed in faraday
cages, which negates this kind of attack - but most financial systems are
NOT protected in this manner.


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.