 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I use this image to show some of the new capabilities of the new
version of "Tomtree", espescially the twig-ramification.
Greetings
Tom Aust
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'vtree.jpg' (144 KB)
Preview of image 'vtree.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Aust wrote:
>
> I use this image to show some of the new capabilities of the new
> version of "Tomtree", espescially the twig-ramification.
>
> Greetings
>
> Tom Aust
>
Genial!
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very cool. Is it blob-derived?
My dream, someday, is to figure out a truly procedurally based tree,
without hundreds of translate and rotate statements.
Marc Schimmler wrote:
> Tom Aust wrote:
> >
> > I use this image to show some of the new capabilities of the new
> > version of "Tomtree", espescially the twig-ramification.
> >
> > Greetings
> >
> > Tom Aust
> >
>
> Genial!
>
> Marc
>
> --
> Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Greg M. Johnson" <gre### [at] my-dejanews com> wrote :
>
> My dream, someday, is to figure out a truly procedurally based tree,
> without hundreds of translate and rotate statements.
>
Again, shouldn't Isosurface be able to do this? Some sort of a fractal
growing and spreading thing?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
That's my dream. I'm thinking that it could involve a "fixed" noise3d with
some kind of ingenious formula to make it branch out more as one increases in
Y........
Bill DeWitt wrote:
> "Greg M. Johnson" <gre### [at] my-dejanewscom> wrote :
> >
> > My dream, someday, is to figure out a truly procedurally based tree,
> > without hundreds of translate and rotate statements.
> >
>
> Again, shouldn't Isosurface be able to do this? Some sort of a fractal
> growing and spreading thing?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Greg M. Johnson <gre### [at] my-dejanewscom> wrote in message
news:38DA2CC0.918E680A@my-dejanews.com...
> That's my dream. I'm thinking that it could involve a "fixed" noise3d with
> some kind of ingenious formula to make it branch out more as one increases
in
> Y........
>
Would using Y be enough? The branches could spread horizontally as well as
vertically and might even bend back towards the ground.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Greg M. Johnson" <gre### [at] my-dejanewscom> wrote in message
news:38DA2CC0.918E680A@my-dejanews.com...
> That's my dream. I'm thinking that it could involve a "fixed" noise3d with
> some kind of ingenious formula to make it branch out more as one increases
in
> Y........
>
I have played with that a little, not knowing what I am doing... I get
mostly lumpy fingers on a square pad.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Bill DeWitt" <the### [at] earthlinknet> wrote in message
news:38da40da@news.povray.org...
>
> I have played with that a little, not knowing what I am doing... I get
> mostly lumpy fingers on a square pad.
>
You shouldn't hit your keys that hard ... :)
--
Paul Vanukoff
van### [at] primenetcom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Greg M. Johnson" <gre### [at] my-dejanewscom> wrote in message
news:38DA2CC0.918E680A@my-dejanews.com...
> That's my dream. I'm thinking that it could involve a "fixed" noise3d with
> some kind of ingenious formula to make it branch out more as one increases
in
> Y........
>
I have been sitting here trying to conceptualize this and I am having a
brain cramp.
I can see a function that divides as it goes up y, but not one that
"branches". Warning ASCII art follows.
I see:
| | | |
| |
|
but not:
\ | |/_
\ |/
|
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Isn't there a tad too many branches? Also I think some of the thinnest ones are
a bit thick.
Actually I'm more impressed by the vegetation to the left and in the lower
right corner. Is that produced by Tomtree too?
sig.
Tom Aust wrote:
>
> I use this image to show some of the new capabilities of the new
> version of "Tomtree", espescially the twig-ramification.
>
> Greetings
>
> Tom Aust
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gnarly! as some people used to say. I'm almost more impressed by the overall
scene. The tree seems a bit on the dense side, about how many days does it take
to parse such a thing?
I didn't see anyone ask about leaves to go with it.
Bob
"Tom Aust" <aus### [at] aust-anfertigungende> wrote in message
news:38DA0A7E.5C4A14D8@aust-anfertigungen.de...
| I use this image to show some of the new capabilities of the new
| version of "Tomtree", espescially the twig-ramification.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oh, gosh! I love it. It might be a bit dense, as some say here, but it looks
GOOD! Reminds me of that oldie 'shadow of the beast' on Amiga.
Any chance for source?
Simen.
Tom Aust skrev i meldingen <38DA0A7E.5C4A14D8@aust-anfertigungen.de>...
>I use this image to show some of the new capabilities of the new
>version of "Tomtree", espescially the twig-ramification.
>
>Greetings
>
>Tom Aust
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Simen Kvaal wrote:
> Any chance for source?
Sure, no problem. http://www.koeln.netsurf.de/~thom.aust/austv2.html
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I love it. I really like the plants too.
--
Phil
...coffee?...yes please! extra sugar,extra cream...Thank you.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
As I said, I wanted to show the major improvements of Tomtree - and this is the
twig-ramification for higher density, but less parsingtime anyway (1 min. for this
scene with height-fields).
All plants are produced by Tomtree.
Have a look for more examples at my site.
http://www.aust-anfertigungen.de > 3D-Visualisierung > virtual trees
Greetings
Tom Aust
Sigmund Kyrre Aas schrieb:
> Isn't there a tad too many branches? Also I think some of the thinnest ones are
> a bit thick.
>
> Actually I'm more impressed by the vegetation to the left and in the lower
> right corner. Is that produced by Tomtree too?
>
> sig.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
As I said, I wanted to show the major improvements of Tomtree - and this is the
twig-ramification for higher density, but less parsingtime anyway.
1 min. for this scene with height-fields!
Have a look for more examples at my site.
http://www.aust-anfertigungen.de > 3D-Visualisierung > virtual trees
Greetings
Tom Aust
Bob Hughes schrieb:
> Gnarly! as some people used to say. I'm almost more impressed by the overall
> scene. The tree seems a bit on the dense side, about how many days does it take
> to parse such a thing?
> I didn't see anyone ask about leaves to go with it.
>
> Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000 22:56:53 +0100, Tom Aust
<aus### [at] aust-anfertigungende> wrote:
>As I said, I wanted to show the major improvements of Tomtree - and this is the
>twig-ramification for higher density, but less parsingtime anyway.
>
>1 min. for this scene with height-fields!
Now *that* is an impressive result, sir!
Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like the ground tiled concrete look, some cracks where the tree grows...?
Does any of the tom tree work w/ the official vers...?
Tom Aust wrote:
> I use this image to show some of the new capabilities of the new
> version of "Tomtree", espescially the twig-ramification.
>
> Greetings
>
> Tom Aust
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Kick ass, excellent tree, (and nice scene to :), tho maybe the tree is a bit
to 'twiggy'
Rick
"Tom Aust" <aus### [at] aust-anfertigungende> wrote in message
news:38DA0A7E.5C4A14D8@aust-anfertigungen.de...
> I use this image to show some of the new capabilities of the new
> version of "Tomtree", espescially the twig-ramification.
>
> Greetings
>
> Tom Aust
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yes, why not!?
Moon47 schrieb:
> I like the ground tiled concrete look, some cracks where the tree grows...?
> Does any of the tom tree work w/ the official vers...?
>
> Tom Aust wrote:
>
> > I use this image to show some of the new capabilities of the new
> > version of "Tomtree", espescially the twig-ramification.
> >
> > Greetings
> >
> > Tom Aust
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
My first reaction: daaamn!!!
My thoughtful reaction: there is most definitely a price to be paid
(resources)
--
___ _______________________________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet> <ICQ 55354965>
|_/avid |ontaine http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
"The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad." -Dali
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tom Aust wrote:
> As I said, I wanted to show the major improvements of Tomtree - and this is the
> twig-ramification for higher density, but less parsingtime anyway.
>
> 1 min. for this scene with height-fields!
No Way!!!
I hereby retract my 'thoughtful reaction'.
--
___ _______________________________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet> <ICQ 55354965>
|_/avid |ontaine http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
"The only difference between me and a madman is that I'm not mad." -Dali
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> No Way!!!
> I hereby retract my 'thoughtful reaction'.
>
lol
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
