 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
Mick
--
*************************************************************
http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
*************************************************************
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'portal2.jpg' (174 KB)
Preview of image 'portal2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wow I really like this one! The edge bewteen the rock and the "other
side" seems a little too sharp to me. Just my 2 cents.
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
> The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
>
> Mick
>
> --
> *************************************************************
> http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
>
> *************************************************************
>
> [Image]
--
Come visit my web site:-) : http://www.geocities.com/~thomaslake/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is 100 percent better than the other one and the other was okay I thought.
Those grass blades sure are introducing a lot of granularity but I think it
doesn't hurt much.
Great fantasy art.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Awesome!
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
>
> The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
>
> Mick
>
> --
> *************************************************************
> http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
>
> *************************************************************
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 06 Feb 2000 11:49:35 -0800, Thomas Lake <tla### [at] home com>
wrote:
>Wow I really like this one! The edge bewteen the rock and the "other
>side" seems a little too sharp to me. Just my 2 cents.
So, I take it you've seen enough portals in person to be able to
accurately judge this scene's realism?
Anyway, I like this image also. The sharpness of the portal itself
tends to draw your attention to that part of the image. Even the
pattern of the clouds above seems to radiate outward from the portal.
It leaves the viewer wanting to approach the portal and to ponder what
it might be like to touch or enter into it - just as portals tend to
do in real life...
:)
Glen Berry
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Having just looked at it for the second time (first time was bleary eyed
early this morning!) I can see it still needs some more work on the grass,
flowers and bottom right hand corner!
Oh well...get on with it!
--
*************************************************************
http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
*************************************************************
"Mick Hazelgrove" <mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> wrote in message
news:389e7642@news.povray.org...
> The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
>
> Mick
>
> --
> *************************************************************
> http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
>
> *************************************************************
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
What a beaute! I think this would make for an incredible dream
sequence... ?
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
> The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
>
> Mick
>
> --
> *************************************************************
> http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
>
> *************************************************************
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
In article <389e7642@news.povray.org>, "Mick Hazelgrove"
<mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> wrote:
> The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
Great image! Especially the grass and the flower-things...the footpath
to the portal was also done well.
Only one thing...the portal appears to open into empty space. Shouldn't
the atmosphere be rushing through the portal, creating a small tornado
and sucking everything in the area along with it? Or does the physics of
the portal prevent that?(a gravitational field surrounding the other
"end" of the portal, strong enough to hold a spherical cloud of
atmosphere with enough pressure to keep the air from passing through?)
Or am I just over-analyzing?
--
Chris Huff
e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You're over analysing! but it's a great idea! don't think I've the math for
it though.
Mick
--
*************************************************************
http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
*************************************************************
"Chris Huff" <chr### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:chrishuff_99-FB2A8A.16423807022000@news.povray.org...
> In article <389e7642@news.povray.org>, "Mick Hazelgrove"
> <mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> wrote:
>
> > The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
>
> Great image! Especially the grass and the flower-things...the footpath
> to the portal was also done well.
> Only one thing...the portal appears to open into empty space. Shouldn't
> the atmosphere be rushing through the portal, creating a small tornado
> and sucking everything in the area along with it? Or does the physics of
> the portal prevent that?(a gravitational field surrounding the other
> "end" of the portal, strong enough to hold a spherical cloud of
> atmosphere with enough pressure to keep the air from passing through?)
> Or am I just over-analyzing?
>
> --
> Chris Huff
> e-mail: chr### [at] yahoocom
> Web page: http://chrishuff.dhs.org/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
*wow*
The rather abrupt color change makes the portal really jump out at you.
I was thinking something didn't look quite right; now I figured it out:
the "other side" seems to lack depth for some reason. Maybe rotate the
galaxy a little if you can so it is not perpindicular to the camera.
--
___ ______________________________________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet> <ICQ 55354965>
|_/avid |ontaine http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
"Sitting on a cornflake, waiting for the van to come" -Beatles
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 07 Feb 2000 16:42:38 -0500, Chris Huff
<chr### [at] yahoocom> wrote:
>In article <389e7642@news.povray.org>, "Mick Hazelgrove"
><mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> wrote:
>
>> The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
>
>Great image! Especially the grass and the flower-things...the footpath
>to the portal was also done well.
>Only one thing...the portal appears to open into empty space. Shouldn't
>the atmosphere be rushing through the portal, creating a small tornado
>and sucking everything in the area along with it? Or does the physics of
>the portal prevent that?(a gravitational field surrounding the other
>"end" of the portal, strong enough to hold a spherical cloud of
>atmosphere with enough pressure to keep the air from passing through?)
>Or am I just over-analyzing?
Perhaps the physics of this portal only allows fast-moving things like
light to get through, and not large slowly moving objects such as
molecules of air? In this case, the portal is not something that one
could travel through, but only an "observation window."
later,
Glen Berry
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Glen Berry wrote:
> Perhaps the physics of this portal only allows fast-moving things like
> light to get through, and not large slowly moving objects such as
> molecules of air? In this case, the portal is not something that one
> could travel through, but only an "observation window."
No, the space landscape was painted on a large canvas and stretched over the
hole, in order to fool imaginative sci-fi fans. I guess that a close-up would
reveal some nails and strings holding the thing.
Very nice image, btw.
G.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
One of the best POV images ever. Would love to
see it as a stereoscopic pair.
Harold
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk (Mick Hazelgrove) wrote in
<389e7642@news.povray.org>:
>The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
Spectacular! I just have to break my own rule here and ask you for the
arch code. I assume it's a torus with some sort of iso-surface applied to
it? The arch by itself would have blown me away, but then you went ahead
and placed it in a really nice scene. Very good job!
Rich
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
As I've said before, I'm a big fan of your work: if I got better, I
think I'd like to do work like yours.
The clouds, however, in some of your recent work, I don't like. It may
simply be a function of the camera angle. It portrays a sense of
urgency, movement, dramatic framing, and this often seems out of place
in your drawings.
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
> The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
>
> Mick
>
> --
> *************************************************************
> http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
>
> *************************************************************
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I really like these, keep 'em comming.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
10:52pm up 4:49, 6 users, load average: 1.69, 1.18, 1.06
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think the clouds, especially in this image really help! I know what you
mean by the sense of urgency you talk about but I think it really fits in
here.
"Greg M. Johnson" wrote:
> As I've said before, I'm a big fan of your work: if I got better, I
> think I'd like to do work like yours.
>
> The clouds, however, in some of your recent work, I don't like. It may
> simply be a function of the camera angle. It portrays a sense of
> urgency, movement, dramatic framing, and this often seems out of place
> in your drawings.
>
> Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
>
> > The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
> >
> > Mick
> >
> > --
> > *************************************************************
> > http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
> >
> > *************************************************************
> >
> > [Image]
--
Come visit my web site:-) : http://www.geocities.com/~thomaslake/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, maybe it's more appropriate for this one. I think there was a more
serene landscape a week or so ago and I never took the time to comment.
Thomas Lake wrote:
> I think the clouds, especially in this image really help! I know what you
> mean by the sense of urgency you talk about but I think it really fits in
> here.
>
> "Greg M. Johnson" wrote:
> > The clouds, however, in some of your recent work, I don't like. It may
> > simply be a function of the camera angle. It portrays a sense of
> > urgency, movement, dramatic framing, and this often seems out of place
> > in your drawings.
> >
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like It pretty much (the first one too), how does it work? how would it
react If you used it in animation? I´ve tried somethin like this as well
(see dimension tunnel in p.b.i.) but if I look at your results I think I´m
doing something else..
btw, what´s that with the Portal patch in Megapov??
Matthias
Mick Hazelgrove <mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag:
389e7642@news.povray.org...
> The other version I mention in my last post - the other side.
>
> Mick
>
> --
> *************************************************************
> http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
>
> *************************************************************
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
