 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
gather your comments anyway.
Mick
--
*************************************************************
http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
*************************************************************
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'portal.jpg' (116 KB)
Preview of image 'portal.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
>
> This has proved to be unbelievable tricky.
Yes, indeed it looks both unbelievable and tricky. Lovely concept and
presentation.
I think you should move the wave center away from the image.
And also perhaps work a bit on the stone texture.
Source will be appreciated...
Margus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
--
*************************************************************
http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
*************************************************************
"Margus Ramst" <mar### [at] peak eduee> wrote in message
news:3895CD66.D2E7AECA@peak.edu.ee...
> Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
> >
> > This has proved to be unbelievable tricky.
>
> Yes, indeed it looks both unbelievable and tricky. Lovely concept and
> presentation.
> I think you should move the wave center away from the image.
Orignally ther was to be an object rising out of the sea and I may well put
it in at a later date - the idea of moving the wave is a good one, I'll try
it
> And also perhaps wor a bit on the stone texture.
The stone texture has dissapeared with the jpg compression!!! I'll rough it
up a bit!
> Source will be appreciated...
It's an unbelievable mess as there are three version of the pic muddled up
together! but when I am sorted I'll post it
Mick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks great to me. Only thing that bothers me a little is the secondary
lighting. It might be more dramatic with more contrast between the
illuminated area of the rock and the shadows.
-Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I like the rock formation it reminds me of something Roger Dean(Yes
album covers)might do.
--
Phil
...coffee?...yes please! extra sugar,extra cream...Thank you.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, the water ripples seem to eminate from one point that if very clearly
seen, and the right hand leg of the portal looks like it gets too small to
support it, but it looks cool. The clouds seem to "zoom" too much, tho.
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
> This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
> and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
> gather your comments anyway.
>
> Mick
>
> --
> *************************************************************
> http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
>
> *************************************************************
>
> [Image]
--
Josh English
eng### [at] spiritonecom
"May your hopes, dreams, and plans not be destroyed by a few zeros."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nice. I don't see how that "moon" could be illuminating this side of the rock
formation, so another one present off-camera?
Anyway, I like the soap film look to the portal.
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Actually, Bobs mention of hte moon got me thinking... maybe one moon outside
the portal and another one inside?
Josh English wrote:
> Well, the water ripples seem to eminate from one point that if very clearly
> seen, and the right hand leg of the portal looks like it gets too small to
> support it, but it looks cool. The clouds seem to "zoom" too much, tho.
>
> Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
>
> > This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
> > and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
> > gather your comments anyway.
> >
> > Mick
> >
> > --
> > *************************************************************
> > http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
> >
> > *************************************************************
> >
> > [Image]
>
> --
> Josh English
> eng### [at] spiritonecom
> "May your hopes, dreams, and plans not be destroyed by a few zeros."
--
Josh English
eng### [at] spiritonecom
"May your hopes, dreams, and plans not be destroyed by a few zeros."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
So, what is not to like?
Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
> This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
> and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
> gather your comments anyway.
>
> Mick
>
> --
> *************************************************************
> http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
>
> *************************************************************
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ooh! Aah! How was the rock made?
The only part I don't like is the rock texture; although it does contrast
nicely colorwise. I don't know what to do with it, but keep the same colors.
--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___ ______________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet>
|_/avid |ontaine <ICQ 55354965>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 16:54:01 -0000, "Mick Hazelgrove"
<mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> wrote:
>This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
>and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
>gather your comments anyway.
>
>Mick
Why don't you really make it a portal? Has the portal pigment patch
made it into MegaPOV yet? If so, it's worth checking out.
Peter Popov
pet### [at] usanet
ICQ: 15002700
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mick
I think tricky is the operative word here.
Comments?
Move the water 'HF' back in the z plane.
Change the arches colour to brown or even black, now!
NTL (NoneTheLess) an image to get lost in.
Nice job, per usual.
JM2¢W
Peter
Peter Warren
war### [at] hotmailcom
Mick Hazelgrove wrote in message <3895c097@news.povray.org>...
>This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
>and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
>gather your comments anyway.
>
>Mick
>
>--
>*************************************************************
> http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
>
>*************************************************************
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 01 Feb 2000 04:07:48 +0200, Peter Popov wrote:
>On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 16:54:01 -0000, "Mick Hazelgrove"
><mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> wrote:
>
>>This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
>>and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
>>gather your comments anyway.
>>
>>Mick
>
>Why don't you really make it a portal? Has the portal pigment patch
>made it into MegaPOV yet? If so, it's worth checking out.
Because those portals won't transmit light, as I understand it. That
is, a light on one side of the portal won't illuminate the other side.
--
These are my opinions. I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
The superpatch: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/superpatch/
My other stuff: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Mick Hazelgrove" <mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> wrote in message
news:3895c097@news.povray.org...
> This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
> and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
> gather your comments anyway.
Very nice.
*I* like the wave in the center. I think it adds drama.
The 2 skies look too much alike to my taste.
The gate in itself is fantastic.
Too bad the sea reflects the same lighting/sky everywhere. But I know of
know way of solving this without image compositing. er... maybe with Megapov
light groups (nver tried this feature myself)?
Povingly,
Philippe
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 11:36:15 +0100, Philippe Debar wrote:
>"Mick Hazelgrove" <mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> wrote in message
>news:3895c097@news.povray.org...
>> This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
>> and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
>> gather your comments anyway.
>
>Very nice.
>*I* like the wave in the center. I think it adds drama.
>The 2 skies look too much alike to my taste.
>The gate in itself is fantastic.
>Too bad the sea reflects the same lighting/sky everywhere. But I know of
>know way of solving this without image compositing. er... maybe with Megapov
>light groups (nver tried this feature myself)?
Or perhaps projected_through, which was designed for just such an
occasion.
--
These are my opinions. I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
The superpatch: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/superpatch/
My other stuff: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stunning.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
2:32am up 2 days, 2:01, 6 users, load average: 1.14, 1.21, 1.11
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Very nice.
>*I* like the wave in the center. I think it adds drama.
>The 2 skies look too much alike to my taste.
>The gate in itself is fantastic.
>Too bad the sea reflects the same lighting/sky everywhere. But I know of
>know way of solving this without image compositing. er... maybe with Megapov
>light groups (nver tried this feature myself)?
You could try the vampire method, You could have a triangular copy of
the sea behind the portal, and have that only reflect light from within
the portal and have the outer light shine on the outer sea.
There are some good demonstrations of the vampire method in the scene files
groups.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
2:32am up 2 days, 2:01, 6 users, load average: 1.14, 1.21, 1.11
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
