POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : portal Server Time
5 Nov 2024 06:21:53 EST (-0500)
  portal (Message 8 to 17 of 17)  
<<< Previous 7 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Josh English
Subject: Re: portal
Date: 31 Jan 2000 17:16:02
Message: <3896097A.AE476AD8@spiritone.com>
Actually, Bobs mention of hte moon got me thinking... maybe one moon outside
the portal and another one inside?

Josh English wrote:

> Well, the water ripples seem to eminate from one point that if very clearly
> seen, and the right hand leg of the portal looks like it gets too small to
> support it, but it looks cool. The clouds seem to "zoom" too much, tho.
>
> Mick Hazelgrove wrote:
>
> > This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
> > and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
> > gather your comments anyway.
> >
> > Mick
> >
> > --
> > *************************************************************
> >        http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
> >
> > *************************************************************
> >
> >  [Image]
>
> --
> Josh English
> eng### [at] spiritonecom
> "May your hopes, dreams, and plans not be destroyed by a few zeros."

--
Josh English
eng### [at] spiritonecom
"May your hopes, dreams, and plans not be destroyed by a few zeros."


Post a reply to this message

From: Arthur Flint
Subject: Re: portal
Date: 31 Jan 2000 18:22:28
Message: <389618B7.E8577889@gci.net>
So, what is not to like?

Mick Hazelgrove wrote:

> This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
> and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
> gather your comments anyway.
>
> Mick
>
> --
> *************************************************************
>        http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
>
> *************************************************************
>
>  [Image]


Post a reply to this message

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: portal
Date: 31 Jan 2000 18:40:39
Message: <38961D45.C95E7A0A@faricy.net>
Ooh! Aah! How was the rock made?
The only part I don't like is the rock texture; although it does contrast
nicely colorwise. I don't know what to do with it, but keep the same colors.

--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___     ______________________________
 | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
 |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>


Post a reply to this message

From: Peter Popov
Subject: Re: portal
Date: 31 Jan 2000 21:08:36
Message: <vT+WOG4l6yYzykwsN1jndQeKGZiy@4ax.com>
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 16:54:01 -0000, "Mick Hazelgrove"
<mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> wrote:

>This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
>and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
>gather your comments anyway.
>
>Mick

Why don't you really make it a portal? Has the portal pigment patch
made it into MegaPOV yet? If so, it's worth checking out.


Peter Popov
pet### [at] usanet
ICQ: 15002700


Post a reply to this message

From: Peter Warren
Subject: Re: portal
Date: 1 Feb 2000 06:10:35
Message: <3896bf2b@news.povray.org>
Mick

I think tricky is the operative word here.
Comments?
Move the water 'HF' back in the z plane.
Change the arches colour to brown or even black, now!

NTL (NoneTheLess) an image to get lost in.
Nice job, per usual.


Peter

Peter Warren
war### [at] hotmailcom


Mick Hazelgrove wrote in message <3895c097@news.povray.org>...
>This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
>and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
>gather your comments anyway.
>
>Mick
>
>--
>*************************************************************
>       http://www.minda.swinternet.co.uk/index.htm
>
>*************************************************************
>
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: portal
Date: 1 Feb 2000 08:58:39
Message: <slrn89dplc.v8.ron.parker@ron.gwmicro.com>
On Tue, 01 Feb 2000 04:07:48 +0200, Peter Popov wrote:
>On Mon, 31 Jan 2000 16:54:01 -0000, "Mick Hazelgrove"
><mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> wrote:
>
>>This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
>>and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
>>gather your comments anyway.
>>
>>Mick
>
>Why don't you really make it a portal? Has the portal pigment patch
>made it into MegaPOV yet? If so, it's worth checking out.

Because those portals won't transmit light, as I understand it.  That
is, a light on one side of the portal won't illuminate the other side.

-- 
These are my opinions.  I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
The superpatch: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/superpatch/
My other stuff: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html


Post a reply to this message

From: Philippe Debar
Subject: Re: portal
Date: 2 Feb 2000 07:43:07
Message: <3898265b@news.povray.org>
"Mick Hazelgrove" <mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> wrote in message
news:3895c097@news.povray.org...
> This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
> and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
> gather your comments anyway.

Very nice.
*I* like the wave in the center. I think it adds drama.
The 2 skies look too much alike to my taste.
The gate in itself is fantastic.
Too bad the sea reflects the same lighting/sky everywhere. But I know of
know way of solving this without image compositing. er... maybe with Megapov
light groups (nver tried this feature myself)?

Povingly,


Philippe


Post a reply to this message

From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: portal
Date: 2 Feb 2000 09:31:10
Message: <slrn89gfu0.v8.ron.parker@ron.gwmicro.com>
On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 11:36:15 +0100, Philippe Debar wrote:
>"Mick Hazelgrove" <mha### [at] mindaswinternetcouk> wrote in message
>news:3895c097@news.povray.org...
>> This has proved to be unbelievable tricky. I'm not really happy with this
>> and have another version which I think will be better but I would like to
>> gather your comments anyway.
>
>Very nice.
>*I* like the wave in the center. I think it adds drama.
>The 2 skies look too much alike to my taste.
>The gate in itself is fantastic.
>Too bad the sea reflects the same lighting/sky everywhere. But I know of
>know way of solving this without image compositing. er... maybe with Megapov
>light groups (nver tried this feature myself)?

Or perhaps projected_through, which was designed for just such an 
occasion.

-- 
These are my opinions.  I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
The superpatch: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/superpatch/
My other stuff: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html


Post a reply to this message

From: Steve
Subject: Re: portal
Date: 4 Feb 2000 22:48:13
Message: <slrn89n4cd.4d9.sjlen@zero-pps.localdomain>
Stunning.

-- 
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps

  2:32am  up 2 days,  2:01,  6 users,  load average: 1.14, 1.21, 1.11


Post a reply to this message

From: Steve
Subject: Re: portal
Date: 4 Feb 2000 22:48:14
Message: <slrn89n4td.4d9.sjlen@zero-pps.localdomain>
>Very nice.
>*I* like the wave in the center. I think it adds drama.
>The 2 skies look too much alike to my taste.
>The gate in itself is fantastic.
>Too bad the sea reflects the same lighting/sky everywhere. But I know of
>know way of solving this without image compositing. er... maybe with Megapov
>light groups (nver tried this feature myself)?

You could try the vampire method, You could have a triangular copy of 
the sea behind the portal, and have that only reflect light from within
the portal and have the outer light shine on the outer sea.  

There are some good demonstrations of the vampire method in the scene files
groups.



-- 
Cheers
Steve              email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk

%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee  0 pps. 

web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/

or  http://start.at/zero-pps

  2:32am  up 2 days,  2:01,  6 users,  load average: 1.14, 1.21, 1.11


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 7 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.