 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: Non-photorealistic photorealistic kind of sort of image (~30k)
Date: 31 Jan 2000 04:55:20
Message: <38955c08@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Makes me all tingly. That means "thrilled" translated from english to english
for all you non-english speaking people. (?)
Bob
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Sander
Subject: Re: Non-photorealistic photorealistic kind of sort of image (~30k)
Date: 31 Jan 2000 05:52:03
Message: <38956953@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Why, it is beautiful!
Maybe just too little depth of field. Like the scene is looked at with a 40x
microscope: these images excel in a very small depth of field.
--
Regards,
Sander
Nieminen Juha <war### [at] punarastas cstutfi> schreef in berichtnieuws
38954b46@news.povray.org...
> Why is it so difficult to make photorealistic images? I'm just unable
to.
> 6 hours of rendering, and got this. I'm not happy with it.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Non-photorealistic photorealistic kind of sort of image (~30k)
Date: 31 Jan 2000 18:47:44
Message: <38961EEF.C597907E@faricy.net>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I think it looks great! From an "Art" perspective anyway. I think Sander was
right about depth of field.
--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___ ______________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet>
|_/avid |ontaine <ICQ 55354965>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Rick [Kitty5]
Subject: Re: Non-photorealistic photorealistic kind of sort of image (~30k)
Date: 31 Jan 2000 19:22:32
Message: <38962748$1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Nieminen Juha" <war### [at] punarastascstutfi> wrote in message
news:38954b46@news.povray.org...
> Why is it so difficult to make photorealistic images? I'm just unable
to.
> 6 hours of rendering, and got this. I'm not happy with it.
exactly what are you not happy with?
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Peter Warren
Subject: Re: Non-photorealistic photorealistic kind of sort of image (~30k)
Date: 1 Feb 2000 05:17:37
Message: <3896b2c1@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I have been having difficulty with my system or I would
have posted this earlier, as I attempted to.
This image brought a tear to my eye.
No Lie.
I, do however sympathize with Nieminen's frustrations.
No need for me to point out the problems.
I can only applaud his noble efforts.
Peter Warren
war### [at] hotmailcom
Nieminen Juha wrote in message <38954b46@news.povray.org>...
> Why is it so difficult to make photorealistic images? I'm just unable to.
> 6 hours of rendering, and got this. I'm not happy with it.
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Peter Warren
Subject: Re: Non-photorealistic photorealistic kind of sort of image (~30k)
Date: 1 Feb 2000 05:37:19
Message: <3896b75f@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It has occurred to me that I know the
Face of Warp. (Arnold.Not)
It is not a 'pretty' face.
I, as well, have put up my visage on the WWW.
It is, as well, not a pretty face.
Vanity compels me to to say that "In the right
light I am *almost* handsome."
This vile image would be found on an old
links page of mine.
http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Studios/1117/links.html
As if anyone cared.
Peter Warren
war### [at] hotmailcom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Peter Warren wrote:
>
> It has occurred to me that I know the
> Face of Warp. (Arnold.Not)
>
> It is not a 'pretty' face.
>
> I, as well, have put up my visage on the WWW.
> It is, as well, not a pretty face.
>
> Vanity compels me to to say that "In the right
> light I am *almost* handsome."
>
> This vile image would be found on an old
> links page of mine.
> http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/Studios/1117/links.html
>
> As if anyone cared.
>
Sure another interesting way to use a cigar! :-)
About photos. I won't post any of myself on the web. I just made some
for an job application and I must say .... baah. Good enough to frighten
little children. It's so much nicer be to be a man without a face. :-)
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marc Schimmler wrote:
> Sure another interesting way to use a cigar! :-)
Is that what that is ?
> About photos. I won't post any of myself on the web. I just made some
> for an job application and I must say .... baah. Good enough to frighten
> little children. It's so much nicer be to be a man without a face. :-)
While there is an image of Uncle Tyler on my intro page it is not me.
It is actually and image of John Tyler the 10th president of the USA.
I don't think the world is ready to gaze upon my magnificent beauty
as I greatly resemble the Vorlon in real life.
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Peter Warren
Subject: Re: Non-photorealistic photorealistic kind of sort of image (~30k)
Date: 1 Feb 2000 06:48:09
Message: <3896c7f9@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ken wrote in message <3896BB01.828A782B@pacbell.net>...
>
>
>Marc Schimmler wrote:
>
>> Sure another interesting way to use a cigar! :-)
>
>Is that what that is ?
I am clueless, as is offen the case, as to the meaning of this.
>While there is an image of Uncle Tyler on my intro page it is not me.
>It is actually and image of John Tyler the 10th president of the USA.
>I don't think the world is ready to gaze upon my magnificent beauty
>as I greatly resemble the Vorlon in real life.
For this I must most humbly thank you.
Peter Warren
war### [at] hotmailcom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Bill DeWitt
Subject: Re: Non-photorealistic photorealistic kind of sort of image (~30k)
Date: 1 Feb 2000 16:01:41
Message: <389749b5@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote :
>
> I greatly resemble the Vorlon in real life.
>
Did you mean Vogon?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
