 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Just had to tweak that temporary bug I posted earlier but the wings still don't look
right.
Full source for the fly, including a height_field generator, should be in p.b.s-f by
now.
Alf
http://www.peake42.freeserve.co.uk/
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Alf_Peake/
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'fly1.jpg' (36 KB)
Preview of image 'fly1.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alf Peake wrote:
> Just had to tweak that temporary bug I posted earlier but the wings still don't look
> right.
> Full source for the fly, including a height_field generator, should be in p.b.s-f by
now.
Wow! This is incredibly realistic for a nature with an organism. (ie, it is *almost*
like a
photo, and these are hard to do)
--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___ ______________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricy net>
|_/avid |ontaine <ICQ 55354965>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
IIRC,
One of the things that define a "Fly" is that it is one of the very few
insects with only -one- pair of wings.
"Alf Peake" <alf### [at] peake42freeservecouk> wrote in message
news:3894c78b@news.povray.org...
> Just had to tweak that temporary bug I posted earlier but the wings still
don't look
> right.
> Full source for the fly, including a height_field generator, should be in
p.b.s-f by now.
>
> Alf
>
> http://www.peake42.freeserve.co.uk/
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Alf_Peake/
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I had forgotten most of that stuff from
high school, but yes, you are right. We can't
even call it a bug, that is another grouping.
Maybe just flying insect.
Bill DeWitt wrote:
>
> IIRC,
> One of the things that define a "Fly" is that it is one of the very few
> insects with only -one- pair of wings.
>
> "Alf Peake" <alf### [at] peake42freeservecouk> wrote in message
> news:3894c78b@news.povray.org...
> > Just had to tweak that temporary bug I posted earlier but the wings still
> don't look
> > right.
> > Full source for the fly, including a height_field generator, should be in
> p.b.s-f by now.
> >
> > Alf
> >
> > http://www.peake42.freeserve.co.uk/
> > http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Alf_Peake/
> >
> >
> >
> >
--
Mr. Art
"Often the appearance of reality is more important
than the reality of the appearance."
Bill DeWitt 2000
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Alf Peake wrote:
>Just had to tweak that temporary bug I posted earlier but the wings
>still don't look right.
Maybe you shoud invert the normal on the wings. The vains are thicker than
the material inbetween. Also try make the vains darker.
Ingo
--
Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
Pov-Ray : http://members.home.nl/seed7/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> wrote in message
news:3894CAF5.58AC03DA@faricy.net...
> Alf Peake wrote:
>
> > Just had to tweak that temporary bug I posted earlier but the wings still don't
look
> > right.
> > Full source for the fly, including a height_field generator, should be in p.b.s-f
by
now.
>
> Wow! This is incredibly realistic for a nature with an organism.
Thank you.
>(ie, it is *almost* like a photo, and these are hard to do)
I *have* been accused of showing photos - *How did you get everything in focus with
such a
close-up shot?*. That is my rarely achieved aim in life with povray :)
Alf
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Oops! Now he tell me :(
I'd never noticed that. Lots of detail you never see until you try to draw it.
Alf
Bill DeWitt <the### [at] earthlinknet> wrote in message
news:3894d22d@news.povray.org...
> IIRC,
> One of the things that define a "Fly" is that it is one of the very few
> insects with only -one- pair of wings.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
There is one large and one small wing in the source which I originally used for
damselfly
wings. They were meant to be scaled up along their length. No normal was used, just a
crackle height_field and inverting that doesn't look quite right. Thanks for input.
Alf
ingo <ing### [at] homenl> wrote in message news:8ECC9EAF2seed7@204.213.191.228...
> Alf Peake wrote:
>
> >Just had to tweak that temporary bug I posted earlier but the wings
> >still don't look right.
>
> Maybe you shoud invert the normal on the wings. The vains are thicker than
> the material inbetween. Also try make the vains darker.
>
> Ingo
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Would you accept a waspy type thingy? Pretty please?
Alf
mr.art <mr.### [at] gcinet> wrote in message news:3894D48B.3A7F68EC@gci.net...
> I had forgotten most of that stuff from
> high school, but yes, you are right. We can't
> even call it a bug, that is another grouping.
> Maybe just flying insect.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sorry, I got stuck in teacher mode again. It looked
like a fly to me until someone spoke up.
Alf Peake wrote:
>
> Would you accept a waspy type thingy? Pretty please?
>
> Alf
>
> mr.art <mr.### [at] gcinet> wrote in message news:3894D48B.3A7F68EC@gci.net...
> > I had forgotten most of that stuff from
> > high school, but yes, you are right. We can't
> > even call it a bug, that is another grouping.
> > Maybe just flying insect.
--
Mr. Art
"Often the appearance of reality is more important
than the reality of the appearance."
Bill DeWitt 2000
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
