From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Lamp Shade, Part III
Date: 29 Jan 2000 23:19:09
Message: <3893BB92.E12DC7BE@faricy.net>
> This time with radiosity (compliments MegaPOV). Really helped with the> ceiling.
Man, how many of these are you gonna post? :-)
--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___ ______________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet>
|_/avid |ontaine <ICQ 55354965>
From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: Lamp Shade, Part III
Date: 30 Jan 2000 01:50:52
Message: <3893df4c@news.povray.org>
The patterns on the doors are good, not so for the walls (esp. nearest facing
one). That's just a typical problem though so it's understandable why it looks
the way it does. Still, it really works well on those doors.
:-) As David F. has pointed out you might start reaching the audience
attention span threshold if you post another 3 of these (like that matters, ha).
Just so you realize. heh-heh
Bob
"cadman" <NOS### [at] graffitinet> wrote in message
news:3893b716@news.povray.org...
| This time with radiosity (compliments MegaPOV). Really helped with the
| ceiling.
From: cadman
Subject: Re: Lamp Shade, Part III
Date: 30 Jan 2000 08:05:46
Message: <3894372a@news.povray.org>
Just wanted to show you guys what radiosity did for me. In terms of
realism, I'd much rather use radiosity than finish {ambient} or a phantom
fill light, even though it takes much longer to render. Anyway, thanks
everyone for your help and point well taken--Lamp Shade will sign off.
David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> wrote in message
news:3893BB92.E12DC7BE@faricy.net...
> > This time with radiosity (compliments MegaPOV). Really helped with the> > ceiling.>> Man, how many of these are you gonna post? :-)>> --> Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/> ___ ______________________________> | \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet>> |_/avid |ontaine <ICQ 55354965>>>
net>
|_/avid |ontaine <ICQ 55354965>