 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Bob Hughes wrote:
>
> Tried radiosity? Unless of course this already uses it.
>
> Bob
>
If you can't see it what's the point? ;)
Remco
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Great work Sander, keep it up! Oh, also, I would add a bit (more) of a
normal to the floor.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Some progress to report: floor by Ron's macro, different lighting,
ceilings
> in 2 types, doorways in the back, and the sun shining through the cracks
in
> the wall.
I really like this one, thaught any about a touch of focal blur?
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I have to steer between what is really needed to make a realistic picture
and the nice things that can be added as extras. Area lights are very
cpu-intensive: this was something like 6 PPS already!
I will have to think this through... ;-)
--
Regards,
Sander
Rick [Kitty5] <pov### [at] dial pipexcom> schreef in berichtnieuws
388f1cba@news.povray.org...
>
>
> I really like this one, thaught any about a touch of focal blur?
>
> Rick
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
vbety nice... i don't think i've seen dis before... so... manufeke...!!...
Sander wrote:
> Some progress to report: floor by Ron's macro, different lighting, ceilings
> in 2 types, doorways in the back, and the sun shining through the cracks in
> the wall.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sander
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sander wrote:
> and the nice things that can be added as extras. Area lights are very
> cpu-intensive: this was something like 6 PPS already!
> I will have to think this through... ;-)
Hi Sander!
when following this thread I was wanting to ask you to add some
scattering media. But with 6 pps already .... (sigh)
I like it as it is.
Karl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Stereogram! Stereogram!
>
> <the crowd goes berserk>
me too B-}
A stereogram would be nice. Did anyone ever think about a stereogram
with media? How would it look like?
Karl
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looking really good now, the last version of this that
I saw had brightly coloured doors or panels at the back
of the scene as I remember, and the lighting looks
much better now, not as busy as it was before.
Keep up the good work, and let us see it when it's
finished.
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
3:19am up 3 days, 11:30, 6 users, load average: 4.22, 4.09, 4.01
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 23:06:32 +0100, Sander <san### [at] stolscom> wrote:
>I have to steer between what is really needed to make a realistic picture
>and the nice things that can be added as extras. Area lights are very
>cpu-intensive: this was something like 6 PPS already!
Sounds like you need a second render dedicated machine or just
install Linux. For the last 5 days I've been rendering 2 large
animations and one high quality still all at the same time, while
reading my news, installing and compiling new software, ripping and
encoding mp3s, the multitasking is superb, shame my modem stuffed up
so I couldn't send or receive any news or mail untill rebooting last
night, (a friend has found me an old external modem Yipee).
--
Cheers
Steve email mailto:sjl### [at] ndirectcouk
%HAV-A-NICEDAY Error not enough coffee 0 pps.
web http://www.ndirect.co.uk/~sjlen/
or http://start.at/zero-pps
1:12am up 23:42, 4 users, load average: 2.09, 2.09, 2.08
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Sander
I kinda wish the floor was more black and white than green.
Still it is a wonderfully evocative image that I always enjoy
to look at.
Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
