 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
When I first dl'ed "Fur generator" by Margus Ramst I thought it
was the greatest thing since sliced bread. This enthusiasm was
tempered a bit as I saw more slices than I could eat on my hard
drive (i.e. I'm not used to working with 20meg incs).
This is my interpretation via pov via fur macro of
the ancient Lingam/Yoni symbol.
There's tons 'wrong' with this pic but I dig it anyway.
So much so that I sent it to a few friends in LA and NY.
One of my friends in LA put it on a 'sticker'. So if it
ends up on the cover of the next Red Hot Chile Peppers (sp)
CD ("Not bloody likely!") there might be grounds for a law-
suit. If it ends up as the cover of the next Orgasmo single
(A realistic possibility) I will fight to give Margus co-credit.
Peter
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Fur_LYsm.jpg' (52 KB)
Preview of image 'Fur_LYsm.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It looks like a furry fountain...
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Peter Warren wrote:
>
Looks like Cousin It could use a hairdo.
Impressive amount of hair! Something for the fetish-freak in everyone of
us?
Remco
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Remco de Korte wrote:
>
> Peter Warren wrote:
> >
>
> Looks like Cousin It could use a hairdo.
> Impressive amount of hair! Something for the fetish-freak in everyone
> of
> us?
>
> Remco
Addendum:
just saw TonyB's Abstrahere-image and immediately thought you could make
yours into a nice series of "Abstrahair" images.
Remco
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
TonyB wrote:
>
> It looks like a furry fountain...
Eyy! Anyone thought of using the hair include files for that purpose?!
Sounds like an interesting idea to pursuit.
--
Børge Berg-Olsen
------------------------------------------------------------------------
+47 90 62 71 78 DoD#2101, NIC#015, Ducati M600, PJ#006, OGM#007
azo### [at] dod no, "Do one thing every day that scares you." --Mary Schmich
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
uuhhmmmm it looks phalic
Peter Warren wrote:
> When I first dl'ed "Fur generator" by Margus Ramst I thought it
> was the greatest thing since sliced bread. This enthusiasm was
> tempered a bit as I saw more slices than I could eat on my hard
> drive (i.e. I'm not used to working with 20meg incs).
>
> This is my interpretation via pov via fur macro of
> the ancient Lingam/Yoni symbol.
>
> There's tons 'wrong' with this pic but I dig it anyway.
> So much so that I sent it to a few friends in LA and NY.
>
> One of my friends in LA put it on a 'sticker'. So if it
> ends up on the cover of the next Red Hot Chile Peppers (sp)
> CD ("Not bloody likely!") there might be grounds for a law-
> suit. If it ends up as the cover of the next Orgasmo single
> (A realistic possibility) I will fight to give Margus co-credit.
>
> Peter
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Noah A wrote:
>uuhhmmmm it looks phalic
it is! (lingam)
>Peter Warren wrote:
>> This is my interpretation via pov via fur macro of
>> the ancient Lingam/Yoni symbol.
Ingo
--
Photography: http://members.home.nl/ingoogni/
Pov-Ray : http://members.home.nl/seed7/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You mean somebody actually uses my hair macros?! :)
If there is interest, I can clean up and u/l a somewhat updated version; it can
reduce the number of objects by eliminating hairs that are not visible to the
camera & specified light sources.
Inc file sizes will still be large, but what do you expect when each hair is one
(or more) object?
Margus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Do one thing every day that scares you."
Oh,no I did that yesterday, bad idea.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Margus Ramst wrote in message <388A0060.A2061914@peak.edu.ee>...
>You mean somebody actually uses my hair macros?! :)
Don't get me started.
>If there is interest, I can clean up and u/l a somewhat updated version;
Ummm, ok.
>Inc file sizes will still be large, but what do you expect ...
Hey, It was way rude of me to mention file size. Forgive?
Seriously, I think this is a very powerful macro. Too bad it
gets f_ed up when one tries to scale it.
La De Da
Peter
Oh, thanks 20thousandtimes
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Peter Warren wrote:
>
> >If there is interest, I can clean up and u/l a somewhat updated version;
> Ummm, ok.
>
OK, posted it to p.b.s-f
See readme.txt for some info.
Margus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Margus
Yes, I saw. I got.
The culling param look very interesting.
I will try it out tomorrow when I restart
my system.
Thanks,
Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Peter Warren" <int### [at] halcyoncom> writes:
>
> This is my interpretation via pov via fur macro of
> the ancient Lingam/Yoni symbol.
Your interpretation, my fur...
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'cylinder.jpg' (12 KB)
Download 'us-ascii' (1 KB)
Preview of image 'cylinder.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas Willhalm wrote in message ...
>Your interpretation, my fur...
*Your* fur is sensuously tactile.
*My* admiration for your work...continues.
Peter Warren
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Your interpretation, my fur...
nice black jpeg, whats that very faint brown donut?
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rick [Kitty5]" <pov### [at] dialpipexcom> writes:
> > Your interpretation, my fur...
>
> nice black jpeg, whats that very faint brown donut?
I'm sorry. My image viewer apparently can't cope with my new true colour
display. It displayed the image much too bright. That's why I darkened it.
The attached version should be okay. It shows more or less Peter Warren's
object with a different kind of fur.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'cylinder.jpg' (13 KB)
Download 'us-ascii' (1 KB)
Preview of image 'cylinder.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
much better, dunno if it looks like fur tho, especially at the edges.
Might be more use for weird star trek trasnporter effects
Rick
"Thomas Willhalm" <tho### [at] willhalmde> wrote in message
news:qqm### [at] schlattfmiuni-konstanzde...
> "Rick [Kitty5]" <pov### [at] dialpipexcom> writes:
>
> > > Your interpretation, my fur...
> >
> > nice black jpeg, whats that very faint brown donut?
>
> I'm sorry. My image viewer apparently can't cope with my new true colour
> display. It displayed the image much too bright. That's why I darkened it.
> The attached version should be okay. It shows more or less Peter Warren's
> object with a different kind of fur.
>
> Thomas
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>
> --
> http://thomas.willhalm.de/ (includes pgp key)
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rick [Kitty5]" <pov### [at] dialpipexcom> writes:
> much better, dunno if it looks like fur tho, especially at the edges.
I have added some noise to the surface. Does is look better now?
Your critics are welcome, because I'm still working on this technique.
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'cylinder.jpg' (12 KB)
Download 'us-ascii' (1 KB)
Preview of image 'cylinder.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
that looks much better, still needs another light in there tho, its a tad
dim!
really light it up, and get it to cast a shaodow, its will be much easier to
see exactly whats whats what
Rick
"Thomas Willhalm" <tho### [at] willhalmde> wrote in message
news:qqm### [at] schlattfmiuni-konstanzde...
> "Rick [Kitty5]" <pov### [at] dialpipexcom> writes:
>
> > much better, dunno if it looks like fur tho, especially at the edges.
>
> I have added some noise to the surface. Does is look better now?
> Your critics are welcome, because I'm still working on this technique.
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>
>
> --
> http://thomas.willhalm.de/ (includes pgp key)
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> > that looks much better, still needs another light in there tho, its a
tad
> > dim!
> >
> > really light it up, and get it to cast a shaodow, its will be much
easier to
> > see exactly whats whats what
>
> Something like this?
oh yes - thats a vast improvement , looks much better now !!!
why is there a seam betwwn the central cylinder and the top sphere - is it
beacuse there seperate objects and not merged into a csg?
it looks a little weird at the edges - like the hairs have blobs on the end
of them
Rick
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Rick [Kitty5]" <pov### [at] dialpipexcom> writes:
>
> why is there a seam betwwn the central cylinder and the top sphere - is it
> beacuse there seperate objects and not merged into a csg?
Yes and no. They are two separate objects that fit together. However,
I have added some noise to the container objects. It is this displacement
that isn't smooth between the objects.
> it looks a little weird at the edges - like the hairs have blobs on the end
> of them
Now that you tell me I remark this, too. Strange -- I don't know where this
comes from. I shouldn't happen. I'll have to have a look at this.
Thomas
--
http://thomas.willhalm.de/ (includes pgp key)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
