 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
didn't show up the first time so here it is again...
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'earth.jpg' (21 KB)
Preview of image 'earth.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike wrote:
>
> didn't show up the first time so here it is again...
>
Beautiful earth ... but where are the stars?
Marc
--
Marc Schimmler
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Marc Schimmler wrote:
>
> Mike wrote:
> >
> > didn't show up the first time so here it is again...
> >
>
> Beautiful earth ... but where are the stars?
The stars are out.
<tee hee>
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
The atmosphere seems to show up most at the poles and on the shadow side of the
terminator. Good going on getting the clouds on there if this is image mapped
and black is clear, white is opaque. The in-between shades can be a hassle to
get right.
The other picture did turn up here, as you may have already seen.
Bob
"Mike" <pov### [at] aol com> wrote in message news:3886B7A6.492CB721@aol.com...
| didn't show up the first time so here it is again...
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> The atmosphere seems to show up most at the poles and on the shadow side of the
> terminator.
I noticed that as well. There seems to be a shadow on the media on the opposite
side of the sun. Think I'm going to need to try different scattering types.
> The other picture did turn up here, as you may have already seen.
My newsreader didn't pick it up for some reason, so I can only see this
thread...unless I mistakenly posted it to another group? Hmm...confused
-Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Beautiful earth ... but where are the stars?
Thanks. I forgot the stars. Was hoping no one would notice. ;)
-Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mike wrote:
> > The other picture did turn up here, as you may have already seen.
>
> My newsreader didn't pick it up for some reason, so I can only see this
> thread...unless I mistakenly posted it to another group? Hmm...confused
It showed up posted to an earlier thread titled "home" started by TonyB
a few months ago. Name collisions happen on a server where the messages
do not expire - I have seen this happen a few times in the past.
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Neat. Aren't those clouds at too high altitude?
sig.
Mike wrote:
>
> didn't show up the first time so here it is again...
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000 01:00:34 -0800, Ken wrote:
>It showed up posted to an earlier thread titled "home" started by TonyB
>a few months ago. Name collisions happen on a server where the messages
>do not expire - I have seen this happen a few times in the past.
Only if your newsreader doesn't do proper threading. They're supposed
to thread off the References: header. Perhaps there's a switch you can
turn on somewhere to fix this behavior.
--
These are my opinions. I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
The superpatch: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/superpatch/
My other stuff: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very nice. Compared to images of Earth (like at
http://planetscapes.com/solar/raw/earth/earthafr.jpg ) your atmosphere is too
high, but you know what? I don't care. It looks much more artistic this way.
In fact, this is an example of art looking better than real life. This is how
I want it to be..
Hope it doesn't get to distorted with stars in the back ground
Mike wrote:
> didn't show up the first time so here it is again...
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
--
Josh English
eng### [at] spiritonecom
ICQ: 1946299
"Stress is when you wake up screaming and realize you haven't fallen asleep
yet."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Ooh
Aah
Your atmosphere is waaaaay to thick but I understand it is for visibility so
that's fine. Maybe you could use the Piqueres technique to give the clouds
more depth... is that a hurricane I see in the upper-right?
--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___ ______________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet>
|_/avid |ontaine <ICQ 55354965>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Which one is your house?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Wow Beauty Full How Was It Done...?
Source...?
Mike wrote:
> going to upload a short animation to p.b.a I think once this one is up.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
This is my reply to the first post somewhere back in 12/25... is where it got
stuck there is another response there too...
from rico:
My only negative comment is that the oceans are not usually
transparent, or calm! <smile> In other words, you really shouldn't be
able to see the underwater contours from this far away. It looks great
otherwise!
Rich
took the liberty of posting this cuz i do not see it here...
Mike wrote:
> didn't show up the first time so here it is again...
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Yup there's a little problem with the image as far the contours go. I need to
touch it up to remove those and improve the land colors a bit. I'm going to put
the source in the binary scene files group but be warned that it isn't ready to
render without some other files.
-Mike
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
pov### [at] aolcom (Mike) wrote in <388979D6.E47ADB85@aol.com>:
>Yup there's a little problem with the image as far the contours go. I
>need to touch it up to remove those and improve the land colors a bit.
>I'm going to put the source in the binary scene files group but be
>warned that it isn't ready to render without some other files.
>
>-Mike
>
If you're using an image_map (it looks like a TGA I have of the world) you
can paint the oceans a uniform blue color. It should also be possible to
use a solid ocean color to apply a bit more reflection to just that part of
the texture.
Rich
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
