POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Dustier? (~22kbbu) Server Time
3 Oct 2024 15:10:22 EDT (-0400)
  Dustier? (~22kbbu) (Message 1 to 10 of 20)  
Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>
From: TonyB
Subject: Dustier? (~22kbbu)
Date: 11 Jan 2000 23:55:46
Message: <387c0952@news.povray.org>
This is my second go at it. It rendered quicker this time, because of lower
samples. I also seem to have darkened the dust somehow. :( Please somebody
explain how to make it whiter. Does it look better now though? I tried to
make it so you could see the wood underneath.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'dusty2.jpg' (22 KB)

Preview of image 'dusty2.jpg'
dusty2.jpg


 

From: Bill DeWitt
Subject: Re: Dustier? (~22kbbu)
Date: 11 Jan 2000 23:59:11
Message: <387c0a1f@news.povray.org>
That's not dust... that's mold!

"TonyB" <ben### [at] panamaphoenixnet> wrote in message
news:387c0952@news.povray.org...
> This is my second go at it. It rendered quicker this time, because of
lower
> samples. I also seem to have darkened the dust somehow. :( Please somebody
> explain how to make it whiter. Does it look better now though? I tried to
> make it so you could see the wood underneath.
>
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Ken
Subject: Re: Dustier? (~22kbbu)
Date: 12 Jan 2000 00:05:05
Message: <387C0C1D.E7EEC844@pacbell.net>
Bill DeWitt wrote:
> 
> That's not dust... that's mold!

My first thought was fungus but close enough.

Tony you may want to re-apply this to a 2 week old pizza or something :)

-- 
Ken Tyler -  1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/


Post a reply to this message

From: omniVERSE
Subject: Re: Dustier? (~22kbbu)
Date: 12 Jan 2000 02:10:32
Message: <387c28e8@news.povray.org>
Does it use 'absorption'?  Maybe have to use a slight 'emssion' anyway.
Almost dirt rather than dust I first thought but I'd have to agree with the
fungal observation.  It has a growing look to it, so probably a little on the
thick side here.  Another thing might be to lower 'extinction' to keep it
brighter if this is using 'scattering'.

Bob

"TonyB" <ben### [at] panamaphoenixnet> wrote in message
news:387c0952@news.povray.org...
> This is my second go at it. It rendered quicker this time, because of lower
> samples. I also seem to have darkened the dust somehow. :( Please somebody
> explain how to make it whiter. Does it look better now though? I tried to
> make it so you could see the wood underneath.
>
>
>


Post a reply to this message

From: Eric Freeman
Subject: Re: Dustier? (~22kbbu)
Date: 12 Jan 2000 02:12:58
Message: <387c297a@news.povray.org>
There's a fungus among us.

Eric
---------------
"A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one
another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own
pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of
labor the bread it has earned.  This is the sum of good government."
     - Thomas Jefferson
     - First inaugural address, 1801
---------------
http://www.ametro.net/~ericfree


Post a reply to this message

From: Bill DeWitt
Subject: Re: Dustier? (~22kbbu)
Date: 12 Jan 2000 07:52:40
Message: <387c7918@news.povray.org>
"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbellnet> wrote in message
news:387C0C1D.E7EEC844@pacbell.net...
>
>
> Bill DeWitt wrote:
> >
> > That's not dust... that's mold!
>
> My first thought was fungus but close enough.
>
> Tony you may want to re-apply this to a 2 week old pizza or something :)
>

    Exactly. And I didn't mean that in a criticizing way.... just that it
would make -great- mold or fungus... You should definitely save those
settings.


Post a reply to this message

From: Gail Shaw
Subject: Re: Dustier? (~22kbbu)
Date: 12 Jan 2000 09:37:03
Message: <387c918f@news.povray.org>
TonyB wrote in message <387c0952@news.povray.org>...
>This is my second go at it. It rendered quicker this time, because of lower
>samples. I also seem to have darkened the dust somehow. :( Please somebody
>explain how to make it whiter. Does it look better now though? I tried to
>make it so you could see the wood underneath.
>


Looks good. Could you give some hints to those of us
who haven't worked out how you did this, please?

Gail
*******************************************************************
* gsh### [at] monotixcoza              * ERROR: COFFEE.COM not found  *
* http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/ * Insert cup and press any key *
*******************************************************************
* Definition of an upgrade: Take the old bugs out, put new ones in*
*******************************************************************


Post a reply to this message

From: TonyB
Subject: Re: Dustier? (~22kbbu)
Date: 12 Jan 2000 09:50:50
Message: <387c94ca@news.povray.org>
>That's not dust... that's mold!


Nooooooooooo!!!!! >O


Post a reply to this message

From: TonyB
Subject: Re: Dustier? (~22kbbu)
Date: 12 Jan 2000 09:51:08
Message: <387c94dc@news.povray.org>
>Tony you may want to re-apply this to a 2 week old pizza or something :)


I'll think about it...


Post a reply to this message

From: TonyB
Subject: Re: Dustier? (~22kbbu)
Date: 12 Jan 2000 09:52:21
Message: <387c9525@news.povray.org>
>...just that it would make -great- mold or fungus...
>You should definitely save those settings.


I wish I'd saved the ones when it looked like a blurred picture. I don't
have any way of getting back to the original image. :( I want dust, not
fungi!


Post a reply to this message

Goto Latest 10 Messages Next 10 Messages >>>

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.