 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
This is my second go at it. It rendered quicker this time, because of lower
samples. I also seem to have darkened the dust somehow. :( Please somebody
explain how to make it whiter. Does it look better now though? I tried to
make it so you could see the wood underneath.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'dusty2.jpg' (22 KB)
Preview of image 'dusty2.jpg'

|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
That's not dust... that's mold!
"TonyB" <ben### [at] panama phoenix net> wrote in message
news:387c0952@news.povray.org...
> This is my second go at it. It rendered quicker this time, because of
lower
> samples. I also seem to have darkened the dust somehow. :( Please somebody
> explain how to make it whiter. Does it look better now though? I tried to
> make it so you could see the wood underneath.
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Bill DeWitt wrote:
>
> That's not dust... that's mold!
My first thought was fungus but close enough.
Tony you may want to re-apply this to a 2 week old pizza or something :)
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Does it use 'absorption'? Maybe have to use a slight 'emssion' anyway.
Almost dirt rather than dust I first thought but I'd have to agree with the
fungal observation. It has a growing look to it, so probably a little on the
thick side here. Another thing might be to lower 'extinction' to keep it
brighter if this is using 'scattering'.
Bob
"TonyB" <ben### [at] panama phoenix net> wrote in message
news:387c0952@news.povray.org...
> This is my second go at it. It rendered quicker this time, because of lower
> samples. I also seem to have darkened the dust somehow. :( Please somebody
> explain how to make it whiter. Does it look better now though? I tried to
> make it so you could see the wood underneath.
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
There's a fungus among us.
Eric
---------------
"A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one
another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own
pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of
labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government."
- Thomas Jefferson
- First inaugural address, 1801
---------------
http://www.ametro.net/~ericfree
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
"Ken" <tyl### [at] pacbell net> wrote in message
news:387C0C1D.E7EEC844@pacbell.net...
>
>
> Bill DeWitt wrote:
> >
> > That's not dust... that's mold!
>
> My first thought was fungus but close enough.
>
> Tony you may want to re-apply this to a 2 week old pizza or something :)
>
Exactly. And I didn't mean that in a criticizing way.... just that it
would make -great- mold or fungus... You should definitely save those
settings.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
TonyB wrote in message <387c0952@news.povray.org>...
>This is my second go at it. It rendered quicker this time, because of lower
>samples. I also seem to have darkened the dust somehow. :( Please somebody
>explain how to make it whiter. Does it look better now though? I tried to
>make it so you could see the wood underneath.
>
Looks good. Could you give some hints to those of us
who haven't worked out how you did this, please?
Gail
*******************************************************************
* gsh### [at] monotix co za * ERROR: COFFEE.COM not found *
* http://www.rucus.ru.ac.za/~gail/ * Insert cup and press any key *
*******************************************************************
* Definition of an upgrade: Take the old bugs out, put new ones in*
*******************************************************************
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>That's not dust... that's mold!
Nooooooooooo!!!!! >O
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>Tony you may want to re-apply this to a 2 week old pizza or something :)
I'll think about it...
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>...just that it would make -great- mold or fungus...
>You should definitely save those settings.
I wish I'd saved the ones when it looked like a blurred picture. I don't
have any way of getting back to the original image. :( I want dust, not
fungi!
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>Does it use 'absorption'? Maybe have to use a slight 'emssion' anyway.
100% scattering 1. No other media types used.
>Another thing might be to lower 'extinction' to keep it
>brighter if this is using 'scattering'.
Ah, so that's what that does...
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>There's a fungus among us.
Harhar... >|
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
In article <387c9525@news.povray.org>, "TonyB" <ben### [at] panama phoenix net> wrote:
>>...just that it would make -great- mold or fungus...
>>You should definitely save those settings.
>
>
>I wish I'd saved the ones when it looked like a blurred picture. I don't
>have any way of getting back to the original image. :( I want dust, not
>fungi!
I'll have to admit that I haven't had much sucess with media stuff, but if
you're using a container to hold the dust, try making it very thin, that might
do the trick. It looks like it's a thick slab.
Just a thought
PHIL
---------------------------------------------------
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Its Growing... Yessssssssss...
TonyB wrote:
> This is my second go at it. It rendered quicker this time, because of lower
> samples. I also seem to have darkened the dust somehow. :( Please somebody
> explain how to make it whiter. Does it look better now though? I tried to
> make it so you could see the wood underneath.
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Excellent!
--
H.E. Day
------------------------
Science is merely a method of gathering data and information.
Science *cannot* prove facts.
It can only provide theories that fit given data.
Technology is merely Science applied to common situations.
Technology is used for both good and evil.
Society is a framework mostly dependent on the willing participation of it
subjects.
Kingdoms and dominions come and go, none are eternal.
In the end, Society, Technology, and Science do not matter. Only the actions
and choices of the individual will matter. <><
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
>Excellent!
In a dusty or moldy way?
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Actually, it looks just like the fur shed (and shed and shed, ...) by my
German Shepherd. I sweep it up weekly.
Jim
--
Bill DeWitt <the### [at] earthlink net> wrote in message
news:387c0a1f@news.povray.org...
> That's not dust... that's mold!
>
> "TonyB" <ben### [at] panama phoenix net> wrote in message
> news:387c0952@news.povray.org...
> > This is my second go at it. It rendered quicker this time, because of
> lower
> > samples. I also seem to have darkened the dust somehow. :( Please
somebody
> > explain how to make it whiter. Does it look better now though? I tried
to
> > make it so you could see the wood underneath.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
Bit of both.
H.E. Day
------------------------
Science is merely a method of gathering data and information.
Science *cannot* prove facts.
It can only provide theories that fit given data.
Technology is merely Science applied to common situations.
Technology is used for both good and evil.
Society is a framework mostly dependent on the willing participation of
it
subjects.
Kingdoms and dominions come and go, none are eternal.
In the end, Society, Technology, and Science do not matter. Only the
actions
and choices of the individual will matter. <><
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
I think real dust would be much more evenly scattered without large blobs of
dust. It looks real good on the ball tho.
--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___ ______________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricy net>
|_/avid |ontaine <ICQ 55354965>
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
John VanSickle wrote:
>
> Eric Freeman wrote:
> >
> > There's a fungus among us.
>
> And it's humongous!
>
> --
> ICQ: 46085459
Mommy, make them stop!
Ken Matassa
Post a reply to this message
|
 |
|  |
|  |
|
 |
|
 |
|  |