>Does it use 'absorption'?  Maybe have to use a slight 'emssion' anyway.

100% scattering 1. No other media types used.


>Another thing might be to lower 'extinction' to keep it
>brighter if this is using 'scattering'.

Ah, so that's what that does...

Post a reply to this message

>There's a fungus among us.


Harhar... >|

Post a reply to this message

In article <387c9525@news.povray.org>, "TonyB" <ben### [at] panamaphoenixnet> wrote:
>>...just that it would make -great- mold or fungus...
>>You should definitely save those settings.
>
>
>I wish I'd saved the ones when it looked like a blurred picture. I don't
>have any way of getting back to the original image. :( I want dust, not
>fungi!

I'll have to admit that I haven't had much sucess with media stuff, but if 
you're using a container to hold the dust, try making it very thin, that might 
do the trick. It looks like it's a thick slab.

Just a thought

PHIL

---------------------------------------------------

Post a reply to this message

Its Growing... Yessssssssss...

TonyB wrote:

> This is my second go at it. It rendered quicker this time, because of lower
> samples. I also seem to have darkened the dust somehow. :( Please somebody
> explain how to make it whiter. Does it look better now though? I tried to
> make it so you could see the wood underneath.
>
>  [Image]

Post a reply to this message

Excellent!

--
H.E. Day
------------------------
Science is merely a method of gathering data and information.
Science *cannot* prove facts.
It can only provide theories that fit given data.
Technology is merely Science applied to common situations.
Technology is used for both good and evil.
Society is a framework mostly dependent on the willing participation of it
subjects.
Kingdoms and dominions come and go, none are eternal.
In the end, Society, Technology, and Science do not matter.  Only the actions
and choices of the individual will matter. <><

Post a reply to this message

>Excellent!

In a dusty or moldy way?

Post a reply to this message

Actually, it looks just like the fur shed (and shed and shed, ...) by my
German Shepherd.  I sweep it up weekly.

Jim

--

Bill DeWitt <the### [at] earthlinknet> wrote in message
news:387c0a1f@news.povray.org...
> That's not dust... that's mold!
>
> "TonyB" <ben### [at] panamaphoenixnet> wrote in message
> news:387c0952@news.povray.org...
> > This is my second go at it. It rendered quicker this time, because of
> lower
> > samples. I also seem to have darkened the dust somehow. :( Please
somebody
> > explain how to make it whiter. Does it look better now though? I tried
to
> > make it so you could see the wood underneath.
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Post a reply to this message

Bit of both.


H.E. Day
------------------------
Science is merely a method of gathering data and information.
Science *cannot* prove facts.
It can only provide theories that fit given data.
Technology is merely Science applied to common situations.
Technology is used for both good and evil.
Society is a framework mostly dependent on the willing participation of
it
subjects.
Kingdoms and dominions come and go, none are eternal.
In the end, Society, Technology, and Science do not matter.  Only the
actions
and choices of the individual will matter. <><

Post a reply to this message

I think real dust would be much more evenly scattered without large blobs of
dust. It looks real good on the ball tho.

--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___     ______________________________
 | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
 |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>

Post a reply to this message

John VanSickle wrote:
> 
> Eric Freeman wrote:
> >
> > There's a fungus among us.
> 
> And it's humongous!
> 
> --
> ICQ: 46085459

Mommy, make them stop!

Ken Matassa

Post a reply to this message