 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: SamuelT
Subject: Re: Isosurface scene - plant2.jpg (?X480 pixels)
Date: 10 Jan 2000 22:53:28
Message: <387AAB3F.8C16C435@aol.com>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
omniVERSE wrote:
> Not sure why there's any question as to the width of this image,<snip!>
The question is mine, since me SE version of PSP won't tell me.
--
Samuel Benge
E-Mail: STB### [at] aol com
Visit the still unfinished isosurface tutorial: http://members.aol.com/stbenge
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: SamuelT
Subject: Re: Isosurface scene - plant2.jpg (?X480 pixels)
Date: 10 Jan 2000 22:55:50
Message: <387AABCD.91E32C9E@aol.com>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Gail Shaw wrote:
> SamuelT. wrote in message <387936A6.F65CA930@aol.com>...
> >Questions? Comments?
>
> Wonderful. Gives a great feeling of peace and calmness
Thanks.
> Any chance of the source/ a larger version. This looks like a very
> good contendor for the next desktop image.
I worry that if I make the image bigger, the plants won't look like plants
anymore, but rather the noisy objects they really are. As for the source, I hope
to update my site soon, which will say how to do these sorts of things.
--
Samuel Benge
E-Mail: STB### [at] aolcom
Visit the still unfinished isosurface tutorial: http://members.aol.com/stbenge
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: SamuelT
Subject: Re: Isosurface scene - plant2.jpg (?X480 pixels)
Date: 10 Jan 2000 22:58:12
Message: <387AAC5B.90D89CB0@aol.com>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
David Wilkinson wrote:
> <snip!>What jars slightly in the image for me is the square base under the canopy
going
> straight
> down into the water. To achieve a more realistic feel to this I would like to see
it
> resting on a, perhaps, sloping rock just surfacing from the water.
It bothers me too, but I forgot to fix it before rendering it. I might use rocks, I
might do
something else, I don't know yet.
> These iso-surfaces are creating a revolution in POV!
Well, isosurfaces are revolutionary objects.
--
Samuel Benge
E-Mail: STB### [at] aolcom
Visit the still unfinished isosurface tutorial: http://members.aol.com/stbenge
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Mark Wagner
Subject: Re: Isosurface scene - plant2.jpg (?X480 pixels)
Date: 11 Jan 2000 00:59:48
Message: <387ac6d4@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
SamuelT. wrote in message <387AAC5B.90D89CB0@aol.com>...
>> These iso-surfaces are creating a revolution in POV!
>
>Well, isosurfaces are revolutionary objects.
Isosurfaces are not revolutionary objects. SORs and lathes are.
Mark
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Mark Wagner wrote:
> Isosurfaces are not revolutionary objects. SORs and lathes are.
I am the center of the universe and everything revolves around me.
--
Ken Tyler - 1300+ Povray, Graphics, 3D Rendering, and Raytracing Links:
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/index.html http://www.povray.org/links/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: Isosurface scene - plant2.jpg (?X480 pixels)
Date: 11 Jan 2000 10:25:00
Message: <387b4b4c@news.povray.org>
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 11 Jan 2000 00:59:46 -0500, Mark Wagner wrote:
>
>SamuelT. wrote in message <387AAC5B.90D89CB0@aol.com>...
>>> These iso-surfaces are creating a revolution in POV!
>>
>>Well, isosurfaces are revolutionary objects.
>
>
>Isosurfaces are not revolutionary objects. SORs and lathes are.
Isosurfaces can be revolutionary objects. For example,
z*z-x*x-y*y+1 threshold 0 is the surface of revolution of a
parabola.
--
These are my opinions. I do NOT speak for the POV-Team.
The superpatch: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/superpatch/
My other stuff: http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
