POV-Ray: Newsgroups: povray.binaries.images: Abstract daylight

POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Abstract daylight		Server Time 5 Nov 2024 10:30:24 EST (-0500)

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Abstract daylight
Date: 4 Jan 2000 00:33:09
Message: <387183A2.9AB439B4@faricy.net>

Which do you like better, this or the old one (considering the old one
was unfinished, imagine it with the rest of the trees and stuff)

--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___     ______________________________
 | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
 |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'abstract.jpg' (85 KB)

Preview of image 'abstract.jpg'

From: Rick
Subject: Re: Abstract daylight
Date: 4 Jan 2000 02:45:39
Message: <3871a523@news.povray.org>

this one is not as ewwww! as the other, therefore the other is better

Rick

"David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricynet> wrote in message
news:387183A2.9AB439B4@faricy.net...
> Which do you like better, this or the old one (considering the old one
> was unfinished, imagine it with the rest of the trees and stuff)
>
> --
> Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
> ___     ______________________________
>  | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
>  |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Post a reply to this message

From: ryan mooney
Subject: Re: Abstract daylight
Date: 4 Jan 2000 03:44:22
Message: <3870637A.5EC54973@earthlink.net>

I Tend To Agree The Other Image I Liked Better...

Mostly Cuz The Funky Eye Things Did Not Shed Shadows... The Shadows Don't Mesh
Well W/ The Other Tree Shadows... That Struck Me As The Most Appealing When I
First Saw The Other Image

Rick wrote:

> this one is not as ewwww! as the other, therefore the other is better
>
> Rick
>
> "David Fontaine" <dav### [at] faricynet> wrote in message
> news:387183A2.9AB439B4@faricy.net...
> > Which do you like better, this or the old one (considering the old one
> > was unfinished, imagine it with the rest of the trees and stuff)
> >
> > --
> > Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
> > ___     ______________________________
> >  | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
> >  |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>
> >
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----

Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Williams
Subject: Re: Abstract daylight
Date: 4 Jan 2000 13:25:03
Message: <CQaXrbAR4bc4EwJP@econym.demon.co.uk>

Wasn't it David Fontaine who wrote:
>Which do you like better, this or the old one (considering the old one
>was unfinished, imagine it with the rest of the trees and stuff)

In general, I prefer the daylight one. However, it makes it more obvious
that parts of the moon are darker than the sky, which is unrealistic. It
almost makes it look like a transparent bubble that's nearer than the
clouds. 

-- 
Mike Williams + #
Gentleman of Leisure

Post a reply to this message

From: Sigmund Kyrre Aas
Subject: Re: Abstract daylight
Date: 4 Jan 2000 15:24:22
Message: <387256E6.62C24B46@stud.ntnu.no>

Could have made it as a monster in Doom!
I think the darker image was better, although this one's got more
believable clouds.

sig.

David Fontaine wrote:
> 
> Which do you like better, this or the old one (considering the old one
> was unfinished, imagine it with the rest of the trees and stuff)
> 
> --
> Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
> ___     ______________________________
>  | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
>  |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  [Image]

Post a reply to this message

From: Harold Baize
Subject: Re: Abstract daylight
Date: 4 Jan 2000 18:41:50
Message: <3872853e@news.povray.org>

I like the daylight one as well. Still think the eyes should have corneas.
It's just adding a slightly flattened glass sphere. In the daylight version
the moon looks like a transparent projection onto the sky. Maybe it could be
moved between the sky_sphere gradient and the cloud layer?

David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet> wrote in message
news:387183A2.9AB439B4@faricy.net...
> Which do you like better, this or the old one (considering the old one
> was unfinished, imagine it with the rest of the trees and stuff)
>
> --
> Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
> ___     ______________________________
>  | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
>  |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

Post a reply to this message

From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Abstract daylight
Date: 5 Jan 2000 00:44:12
Message: <3872D7C7.D29244C@faricy.net>

> I like the daylight one as well. Still think the eyes should have corneas.

They do, they're just kind of small and hard to see.

--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___     ______________________________
 | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
 |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>

Post a reply to this message