POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Routered Boxes (38.6KB) Server Time
5 Nov 2024 16:42:32 EST (-0500)
  Routered Boxes (38.6KB) (Message 11 to 13 of 13)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: David Fontaine
Subject: Re: Routered Boxes (38.6KB)
Date: 4 Jan 2000 17:46:13
Message: <387275E8.D79C54F1@faricy.net>
> Not rounded, routered. As in the tool that can make cuts in the
> sides of wood for that nice, styled look.

I misread the subject.

--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___     ______________________________
 | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
 |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>


Post a reply to this message

From: Dennis McDaniel
Subject: Re: Routered Boxes (38.6KB)
Date: 7 Jan 2000 00:14:48
Message: <38757672.98711164@inreach.com>
Paul:

Very nice image.  As for rendering for printing, I agree with David.  However,
a word of caution:  Be careful of the raw print file size, which is
substantially larger than the image file size.  I rendered an 8x10 image at 300
dpi (2400 x 3000) and it generated a 140MB print file that took
foooorrrreeeevvvveeeerrrrr to print.  The computer I used to print it only had
128MB of RAM and it printed on an Epson Stylus Photo 750 which isn't a very
high end printer.  These factors contributed to print time.  Good luck.

Dennis McDaniel
den### [at] inreachcom

Paul Vanukoff wrote:

> I really like the way this came out. I've always liked images like this. It
> looks a lot better at the rendered size of 1024x768. I am thinking about
> moving the camera away a bit, adding a galaxy.inc background and making a
> poster of it. Does anyone have experience with that? What size should I
> render at if, say, I wanted a 24x18 inch poster?
>
> --
> Paul Vanukoff
> van### [at] primenetcom
>
>  [Image]


Post a reply to this message

From: Paul Vanukoff
Subject: Re: Routered Boxes (38.6KB)
Date: 7 Jan 2000 13:01:26
Message: <387629f6@news.povray.org>
Thanks for the compliment and warning. I actually plan on taking my final
render to a professional print shop, so I ain't worried too much about file
size and print time ... :D

--
Paul Vanukoff
van### [at] primenetcom


Dennis McDaniel wrote in message <38757672.98711164@inreach.com>...
>Paul:
>
>Very nice image.  As for rendering for printing, I agree with David.
However,
>a word of caution:  Be careful of the raw print file size, which is
>substantially larger than the image file size.  I rendered an 8x10 image at
300
>dpi (2400 x 3000) and it generated a 140MB print file that took
>foooorrrreeeevvvveeeerrrrr to print.  The computer I used to print it only
had
>128MB of RAM and it printed on an Epson Stylus Photo 750 which isn't a very
>high end printer.  These factors contributed to print time.  Good luck.
>
>Dennis McDaniel
>den### [at] inreachcom
>


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.