 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Not rounded, routered. As in the tool that can make cuts in the
> sides of wood for that nice, styled look.
I misread the subject.
--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___ ______________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricy net>
|_/avid |ontaine <ICQ 55354965>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Paul:
Very nice image. As for rendering for printing, I agree with David. However,
a word of caution: Be careful of the raw print file size, which is
substantially larger than the image file size. I rendered an 8x10 image at 300
dpi (2400 x 3000) and it generated a 140MB print file that took
foooorrrreeeevvvveeeerrrrr to print. The computer I used to print it only had
128MB of RAM and it printed on an Epson Stylus Photo 750 which isn't a very
high end printer. These factors contributed to print time. Good luck.
Dennis McDaniel
den### [at] inreachcom
Paul Vanukoff wrote:
> I really like the way this came out. I've always liked images like this. It
> looks a lot better at the rendered size of 1024x768. I am thinking about
> moving the camera away a bit, adding a galaxy.inc background and making a
> poster of it. Does anyone have experience with that? What size should I
> render at if, say, I wanted a 24x18 inch poster?
>
> --
> Paul Vanukoff
> van### [at] primenetcom
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thanks for the compliment and warning. I actually plan on taking my final
render to a professional print shop, so I ain't worried too much about file
size and print time ... :D
--
Paul Vanukoff
van### [at] primenetcom
Dennis McDaniel wrote in message <38757672.98711164@inreach.com>...
>Paul:
>
>Very nice image. As for rendering for printing, I agree with David.
However,
>a word of caution: Be careful of the raw print file size, which is
>substantially larger than the image file size. I rendered an 8x10 image at
300
>dpi (2400 x 3000) and it generated a 140MB print file that took
>foooorrrreeeevvvveeeerrrrr to print. The computer I used to print it only
had
>128MB of RAM and it printed on an Epson Stylus Photo 750 which isn't a very
>high end printer. These factors contributed to print time. Good luck.
>
>Dennis McDaniel
>den### [at] inreachcom
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
