 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here's David Fontaine's Namedisk. This will probably be ~700K encoded, but
it's much clearer then David's puny 1600x1200 version ;)
The heightfield was rendered at 6400x4800, so it's really nice and sharp,
and the image is, as the subject says, in 3200x2400. It has been compressed
with Paint Shop Pro 5 (yes, I know 6 is out, but I don't feel like paying
US$40 for an upgrade) with 33 JPG compression. Enjoy [the download time]!
;-)
--
This message brought to you by:
-=< Ian (the### [at] hotmail com >=-
Please visit my site at http://spectere2000.cjb.net! :)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'namelist.jpg' (528 KB)
Preview of image 'namelist.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hi David: had your small picture down in no time!!
Made one for myself in 7680x5760x24 tga: a nice 129.601 kB. Wouldn't dare to
compress it or post it. But it looks just great: colours a bit brighter. I
will try to print it LARGE as a poster.
Nice idea all this!
--
Regards,
Sander
Ian Burgmyer <the### [at] hotmailcom> schreef in berichtnieuws
386d408f@news.povray.org...
> Here's David Fontaine's Namedisk. This will probably be ~700K encoded,
but
> it's much clearer then David's puny 1600x1200 version ;)
>
> The heightfield was rendered at 6400x4800, so it's really nice and sharp,
> and the image is, as the subject says, in 3200x2400. It has been
compressed
> with Paint Shop Pro 5 (yes, I know 6 is out, but I don't feel like paying
> US$40 for an upgrade) with 33 JPG compression. Enjoy [the download time]!
> ;-)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On second thoughts: here is part of my render.
Hope you get an impression of the poster...
--
Regards,
Sander
Ian Burgmyer <the### [at] hotmailcom> schreef in berichtnieuws
386d408f@news.povray.org...
> Here's David Fontaine's Namedisk. This will probably be ~700K encoded,
but
> it's much clearer then David's puny 1600x1200 version ;)
>
> The heightfield was rendered at 6400x4800, so it's really nice and sharp,
> and the image is, as the subject says, in 3200x2400. It has been
compressed
> with Paint Shop Pro 5 (yes, I know 6 is out, but I don't feel like paying
> US$40 for an upgrade) with 33 JPG compression. Enjoy [the download time]!
> ;-)
>
> --
> This message brought to you by:
> -=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-
>
> Please visit my site at http://spectere2000.cjb.net! :)
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'David.jpg' (61 KB)
Preview of image 'David.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Very nice. Still looking for myself.
JPEG hates you. Hate it back.
Margus
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Margus Ramst" <mar### [at] peakeduee> wrote in message
news:386D4E50.3641CFCD@peak.edu.ee...
> Very nice. Still looking for myself.
Second name directly inward from far left edge B^)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I almost rendered a large one myself, then I thought to myself "self, this
would be good animated in a circle closer up" and tried it out but either
the motion was always to great or too few frames to keep render time down,
or it was too small to see unless a really closeup view and then of course
way too many frames then for me to want to render it that way.
The parsing alone can be awhile if using the 5000x5000 Png for hf like I was
doing.
You know what though? How about adjusting those stands away from the
writing so you can see all of it? I just moved them outward some, should be
reshaped probably.
Anyway, it's great in both meaning and form. Thanks guys.
Bob
"Ian Burgmyer" <the### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:386d408f@news.povray.org...
> Here's David Fontaine's Namedisk. This will probably be ~700K encoded,
but
> it's much clearer then David's puny 1600x1200 version ;)
>
> The heightfield was rendered at 6400x4800, so it's really nice and sharp,
> and the image is, as the subject says, in 3200x2400. It has been
compressed
> with Paint Shop Pro 5 (yes, I know 6 is out, but I don't feel like paying
> US$40 for an upgrade) with 33 JPG compression. Enjoy [the download time]!
> ;-)
>
> --
> This message brought to you by:
> -=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-
>
> Please visit my site at http://spectere2000.cjb.net! :)
>
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I hate to wreck your hard work, but my birth date appears on the disk as
11-Dec-52, when in fact it is 4-Apr-82. I'm not THAT old.
H.E. Day
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
WHOA!!!!!
--
This message brought to you by:
-=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-
Please visit my site at http://spectere2000.cjb.net! :)
Sander <san### [at] stolscom> wrote in message news:386d4872@news.povray.org...
> On second thoughts: here is part of my render.
> Hope you get an impression of the poster...
> --
> Regards,
> Sander
>
>
> Ian Burgmyer <the### [at] hotmailcom> schreef in berichtnieuws
> 386d408f@news.povray.org...
> > Here's David Fontaine's Namedisk. This will probably be ~700K encoded,
> but
> > it's much clearer then David's puny 1600x1200 version ;)
> >
> > The heightfield was rendered at 6400x4800, so it's really nice and
sharp,
> > and the image is, as the subject says, in 3200x2400. It has been
> compressed
> > with Paint Shop Pro 5 (yes, I know 6 is out, but I don't feel like
paying
> > US$40 for an upgrade) with 33 JPG compression. Enjoy [the download
time]!
> > ;-)
> >
> > --
> > This message brought to you by:
> > -=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-
> >
> > Please visit my site at http://spectere2000.cjb.net! :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ARGH!!! Blame David ;P
--
This message brought to you by:
-=< Ian (the### [at] hotmailcom >=-
Please visit my site at http://spectere2000.cjb.net! :)
H.E. Day <mil### [at] teleportcom> wrote in message
news:386D8EAA.A53A3982@teleport.com...
> I hate to wreck your hard work, but my birth date appears on the disk as
> 11-Dec-52, when in fact it is 4-Apr-82. I'm not THAT old.
>
> H.E. Day
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> I hate to wreck your hard work, but my birth date appears on the disk as
> 11-Dec-52, when in fact it is 4-Apr-82. I'm not THAT old.
Don't scare me like that! You read it wrong. It goes "DD-MMM-YY - Name -
Location" and there is a " | " between persons.
--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___ ______________________________
| \ |_ <dav### [at] faricynet>
|_/avid |ontaine <ICQ 55354965>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
