"Karl Pelzer" <Kar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
news:389### [at] t-onlinede...
>
> Yep, no problem. I'm not a native speaker too
> (neither, either,... ? Don't know).

"not... either" = correct.

"not... neither" = double negative, not correct (except in the south).

;-)

Eric
---------------
"A wise and frugal government, which shall restrain men from injuring one
another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own
pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of
labor the bread it has earned.  This is the sum of good government."
     - Thomas Jefferson
     - First inaugural address, 1801
---------------
http://www.ametro.net/~ericfree

Post a reply to this message

Eric Freeman wrote:

> "Karl Pelzer" <Kar### [at] t-onlinede> wrote in message
> news:389### [at] t-onlinede...
> >
> > Yep, no problem. I'm not a native speaker too
> > (neither, either,... ? Don't know).
>
> "not... either" = correct.
>
> "not... neither" = double negative, not correct (except in the south).

    Yeah, right.

Post a reply to this message

>     Yeah, right.

If you are trying to say that a double positive is a negative than you are
wrong because the implied sarcasm reverses whatever you say, so it's really
two positives and a negative.

--
Homepage: http://www.faricy.net/~davidf/
___     ______________________________
 | \     |_       <dav### [at] faricynet>
 |_/avid |ontaine      <ICQ 55354965>

Post a reply to this message

Nikumaru,
That is why many people learn to view by crossing their eyes.
It works with any size stereo pair. The left and right image
are placed on the other side.

Harold

Nikumaru <nik### [at] willnetnejp> wrote in message
news:386d57c6@news.povray.org...
>
>  Oh! sorry. Now you have eyestrain, don't you?
>  Here is the larger version.
>  But It will be more difficult to see as a stereogram.
>  Because the distance between the two pictures due to its larger size.
>  You cannot see it if the distance exceeds distance between your eyes.
>  In this case, put the right picture to the left and left one to the
right,
> and see the picture put left by right eye and the other one by left eye.
>  Or put them normally ( the left picture to the left ) and you stand
enough
> distance away from the screen and see them.
>  I post the larger version of the stereogram separated into two parts of
> left picture and right picture. (Left picture means the picture is view of
> left eye.)
>  So, please try each method.
>
>
>  I'm sorry for my poor English. Can you understand what I would like to
say?
>
> Nikumru
>
>

Post a reply to this message

On Mon, 03 Jan 2000 15:28:16 -0600, David Fontaine <dav### [at] faricynet>
wrote:

>>     Yeah, right.
>
>If you are trying to say that a double positive is a negative than you are
>wrong because the implied sarcasm reverses whatever you say, so it's really
>two positives and a negative.

Yeah, but you have to admit that sarcasm is somewhat "by default" when
Matt is around so it really doesn't count anymore :))


Peter Popov
pet### [at] usanet
ICQ: 15002700

Post a reply to this message

It's very hard for me - sometimes painful - to "hold" a cross-eyed image.

Harold Baize wrote:
> That is why many people learn to view by crossing their eyes.
> It works with any size stereo pair. The left and right image
> are placed on the other side.
> 
> Nikumaru <nik### [at] willnetnejp> wrote
> >  Here is the larger version.
> >  But It will be more difficult to see as a stereogram.
> >  Because the distance between the two pictures due to its larger size.
> >  You cannot see it if the distance exceeds distance between your eyes.
	...

-- 
"How'd ya like to climb this high without no mountain?" --Porky Pine
Anton Sherwood  *\\* +1 415 267 0685 *\\* http://www.jps.net/antons/

Post a reply to this message

Eric Freeman wrote:

> > Yep, no problem. I'm not a native speaker too
> > (neither, either,... ? Don't know).
> 
> "not... either" = correct.
> 
> "not... neither" = double negative, not correct (except in the south).
> 

Thanks!

Karl

Post a reply to this message