POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : PoV-Ray or RealLife(TM) ? ;-) Server Time
4 Oct 2024 03:19:00 EDT (-0400)
  PoV-Ray or RealLife(TM) ? ;-) (Message 11 to 12 of 12)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: PoV-Ray or RealLife(TM) ? ;-)
Date: 5 May 1999 21:52:25
Message: <3730E7B5.71B58311@aol.com>
The reflections and shadows in the water are interesting although cause
this to look pretty strange. I believe most notably would be the granular
appearence going from mid distance to far changes little. Makes it seem
like 'crand' is used instead. If there were a way to smooth that at
greater distances I think it would improve greatly.


Michael Andrews wrote:
> 
> Hi Folks, me again.
>         Those of you who think this is a photo, raise your hand. Come on now,
> let's get a count. Mmm hmm. Right, you can put them down now. And the
> people out there who know a fake Awesome Rolex (a faked fake :-) when
> they see one? Ah hah, OK.
>         Well, let me hear some comments, OK?
> 
>         Bye for now,
>                 Mike Andrews.
> 
>   --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  [Image]

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto://inversez@aol.com?Subject=PoV-News


Post a reply to this message

From: Nobot
Subject: OH MY GOD YOU KILLED THE CAMERA!
Date: 6 May 1999 00:40:17
Message: <37310EDE.EA7F8028@powersurfr.com>
looks a TAT spekled.... bad even "cap'n we need more rays!"


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.