I was uploading an animation to the binaries.animations group, but for some
reason the transfer wouldn't go. SO, here is a frame from further on in what
is becoming quite an effort!
This is an ongoing project for next Christmas.
--
GrimDude
vos### [at] arkansasnet
From: Greg M Johnson
Subject: Re: 56Kb Nutcracker Toys
Date: 27 Jan 1999 10:06:55
Message: <36AF2ACE.3C8B916E@aol.com>
Looks pretty cool. I'd like to see how you manage the walking.
Just a tip: for an animation, does the image need to be so large? Stills this
size are cool, but I wonder if animations ought to be smaller. Could this be
the problem with the upload?
GrimDude wrote:
> I was uploading an animation to the binaries.animations group, but for some> reason the transfer wouldn't go. SO, here is a frame from further on in what> is becoming quite an effort!>> This is an ongoing project for next Christmas.>> --> GrimDude> vos### [at] arkansasnet>> [Image]
This was a test frame. The animation is the same resolution as the Toys
animation I already uploaded. There is a 1Meg limit on the board, but it
refused an 860Kb file.
GrimDude
vos### [at] arkansasnet
>This was a test frame. The animation is the same resolution as the Toys>animation I already uploaded. There is a 1Meg limit on the board, but it>refused an 860Kb file.
860kb before or after UUencoding? :)
Well! There you have it!
Grim
Jeff wrote in message <36af75bf.0@news.povray.org>...
>>This was a test frame. The animation is the same resolution as the Toys>>animation I already uploaded. There is a 1Meg limit on the board, but it>>refused an 860Kb file.>>>860kb before or after UUencoding? :)>>
net
