 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nothing interesting in these images (technically speaking), but I like the
strange feeling of quietness
Philippe
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'DALIP1.JPG' (39 KB)
Download 'DALIP2.JPG' (51 KB)
Preview of image 'DALIP1.JPG'
Preview of image 'DALIP2.JPG'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Really does look quiet, unreally dream-like, a feeling I get when looking at
Dali's pictures. You really should use antialiasing, though.
Dali is one of my favourite artists, BTW.
Margus
Ph Gibone wrote:
>
> Nothing interesting in these images (technically speaking), but I like the
> strange feeling of quietness
>
> Philippe
>
> [Image]
>
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Much better with antialiasing : Thanks a lot
Philippe
>Really does look quiet, unreally dream-like, a feeling I get when looking
at
>Dali's pictures. You really should use antialiasing, though.
>
>Dali is one of my favourite artists, BTW.
>
>Margus
>
>Ph Gibone wrote:
>>
>> Nothing interesting in these images (technically speaking), but I like
the
>> strange feeling of quietness
>>
>> Philippe
>>
>> [Image]
>>
>> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
It's the Dali "aliased period" isn't it? :)
Like the two images together, meaning something like it in one image
maybe?
Ph Gibone wrote:
>
> Much better with antialiasing : Thanks a lot
>
> Philippe
> >Really does look quiet, unreally dream-like, a feeling I get when looking
> at
> >Dali's pictures. You really should use antialiasing, though.
> >
> >Dali is one of my favourite artists, BTW.
> >
> >Margus
> >
> >Ph Gibone wrote:
> >>
> >> Nothing interesting in these images (technically speaking), but I like
> the
> >> strange feeling of quietness
> >>
> >> Philippe
> >>
> >> [Image]
> >>
> >> [Image]
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto:inv### [at] aol com?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>Like the two images together, meaning something like it in one image
>maybe?
>
Two different cameras in the same scene !
The second image was just traced for checking purposes, but I liked it.
Philippe
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
When I re-read my previous reply I didn't hardly understand myself.
Yes, I like the two wholly different camera positions. Would make for a
good composite image, one done without mirrors. Which would no doubt
entail some sort of pasting of the two into a single one or rendering
one then adding it 'image_map'ed into a second offset view.
Ph Gibone wrote:
> Two different cameras in the same scene !
> The second image was just traced for checking purposes, but I liked it.
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
