 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I am making this logo for my group in Advanced Software Developement
class...This is obviously a complete rip off of the Sun Logo, but we
weren't very creative when coming up with a group name. Anyhow, I had a
few questions. The biggest is if you think it is better to have the
logo readable in the reflection, or if you like just having it obviously
reflecting. Also, should I kill the reflections? Any other comments
are of course appreciated, but this is not something I intend to spend
tons of time on.
Steve
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'moonlogo.jpg' (14 KB)
Preview of image 'moonlogo.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
I meant should I kill the shadows, not the reflections...
Steve
Stephen Lavedas wrote:
>
> I am making this logo for my group in Advanced Software Developement
> class...This is obviously a complete rip off of the Sun Logo, but we
> weren't very creative when coming up with a group name. Anyhow, I had a
> few questions. The biggest is if you think it is better to have the
> logo readable in the reflection, or if you like just having it obviously
> reflecting. Also, should I kill the reflections? Any other comments
> are of course appreciated, but this is not something I intend to spend
> tons of time on.
>
> Steve
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
What kind of word is NOOW? ;-)
I think less wave action would be better (and killing the shadows would
make it more logo-like). Also, with all that reflecting going on, make
sure you use a version of POV that has the reflection bug fixed (does
anybody out there one?)
-Nathan
Stephen Lavedas wrote:
>
> I am making this logo for my group in Advanced Software Developement
> class...This is obviously a complete rip off of the Sun Logo, but we
> weren't very creative when coming up with a group name. Anyhow, I had a
> few questions. The biggest is if you think it is better to have the
> logo readable in the reflection, or if you like just having it obviously
> reflecting. Also, should I kill the reflections? Any other comments
> are of course appreciated, but this is not something I intend to spend
> tons of time on.
>
> Steve
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
What reflection bug? What version is that?
Kyle
Nathan Kopp wrote:
>
> What kind of word is NOOW? ;-)
>
> I think less wave action would be better (and killing the shadows would
> make it more logo-like). Also, with all that reflecting going on, make
> sure you use a version of POV that has the reflection bug fixed (does
> anybody out there one?)
>
> -Nathan
>
> Stephen Lavedas wrote:
> >
> > I am making this logo for my group in Advanced Software Developement
> > class...This is obviously a complete rip off of the Sun Logo, but we
> > weren't very creative when coming up with a group name. Anyhow, I had a
> > few questions. The biggest is if you think it is better to have the
> > logo readable in the reflection, or if you like just having it obviously
> > reflecting. Also, should I kill the reflections? Any other comments
> > are of course appreciated, but this is not something I intend to spend
> > tons of time on.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > [Image]
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
You miss all the talk about that?
Reflections in v.3.1 have leak-through to other side if a normal is
used.
I like the logo as is, the ripples make it appear large is all. And the
blue color reminds me of moonlight.
Kyle wrote:
>
> What reflection bug? What version is that?
> Kyle
>
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
mailto:inv### [at] aol com?PoV
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
