 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 1 Oct 1999 09:44:32 -0400, par### [at] fwi com (Ron Parker) wrote:
>On Fri, 01 Oct 1999 01:56:15 -0400, Glen Berry wrote:
>>On 30 Sep 1999 11:56:06 -0400, Nieminen Juha <war### [at] cctutfi> wrote:
>
>>Ron Parker once said that this sort of enhanced focal blur wouldn't be
>>too hard to build into POV-Ray, but no one ever seemed to get around
>>to adding this little enhancement.
>
>Can someone remind me when and where I said that? Was it here, or on
>IRC? I must be getting old.
Funny, I would have sworn that you said something to the effect that
the technique could be emulated in a custom POV-Ray patch, without
suffering nearly so much in render time as having to render all those
frames seperately. As to whether this comment was made on a news
group, IRC, private email, or perhaps somewhere in the recesses of my
sometimes faulty memory - I'm not sure. If I had to guess, I think it
was IRC and you were just "thinking aloud" when you said it. It didn't
seem to be something that you put a lot of thought or work into. That
was some time ago. If I misunderstood you, or simply have the story
incorrect, I apologize.
Also, I'll be giving POV's focal blur another shot with Nieminen's
comments about the confidence value in mind. Maybe it isn't as bad as
I first thought.
Later,
Glen
To reply via email, remove the "7" from nos### [at] ezwvcom
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Mon, 04 Oct 1999 05:48:09 -0400, Glen Berry wrote:
>Funny, I would have sworn that you said something to the effect that
>the technique could be emulated in a custom POV-Ray patch, without
>suffering nearly so much in render time as having to render all those
>frames seperately. As to whether this comment was made on a news
>group, IRC, private email, or perhaps somewhere in the recesses of my
>sometimes faulty memory - I'm not sure. If I had to guess, I think it
>was IRC and you were just "thinking aloud" when you said it. It didn't
>seem to be something that you put a lot of thought or work into. That
>was some time ago. If I misunderstood you, or simply have the story
>incorrect, I apologize.
No offense taken, I remember the discussion but I don't remember where
it was or how I would have done it, and I hoped maybe you did in case
I left some clues for myself there. :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
