 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 13:26:28 +0300, Warp <war### [at] tag povrayorg> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> How about the two standard cat poses? If they are nearer to what you want I can
>> modify them.
>
> I suppose the second one is closer.
>
I've gone back a step to the one you said was stretching and tried to copy the
stance in the photo. Is that better?
> I'm just not understanding what is unclear about what is it that I
>want. I just want the same pose as in that dog photo. If it looks
>radically different, it's not what I'm looking for.
I think that there are a couple of things that are in the way of enlightenment
:)
Mostly it is because we are working remotely and you can't point at the screen
and say move that. Secondly I think that you can imagine what the dog looks like
from the side but I only have a vague idea. I need to be able to visualise from
at least three elevations. Poser is quite exacting and I am no expert. I
generally only use it in a rough and ready manner.
You should think of your requirements the way you would if you were writing a
spec. e.g. Lower the chest, move the right paw back and lift the right shoulder.
Turn the head to the right keeping the line of the eyes parallel to the ground
etc.
I hope that this one is a bit nearer what you want.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Fox_4a_1.jpg' (24 KB)
Download 'Fox_4a_2.jpg' (17 KB)
Preview of image 'Fox_4a_1.jpg'
Preview of image 'Fox_4a_2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> I hope that this one is a bit nearer what you want.
Yes, this is much closer. Maybe if it looked just a bit more to its
left it would be even better. The tail could be higher (basically the
only difference from the dog photo).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:20:20 +0300, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> I hope that this one is a bit nearer what you want.
>
> Yes, this is much closer. Maybe if it looked just a bit more to its
>left it would be even better. The tail could be higher (basically the
>only difference from the dog photo).
Good, Now the detail, if you want.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Fox_4b_1.jpg' (22 KB)
Download 'Fox_4b_2.jpg' (21 KB)
Download 'Fox_4b_3.jpg' (20 KB)
Preview of image 'Fox_4b_1.jpg'
Preview of image 'Fox_4b_2.jpg'
Preview of image 'Fox_4b_3.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:38:18 +0100, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:
>Good, Now the detail, if you want.
Looking down a bit more.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Fox_4c_1.png' (83 KB)
Download 'Fox_4c_2.png' (59 KB)
Preview of image 'Fox_4c_1.png'
Preview of image 'Fox_4c_2.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Well, it's now definitely closer, although not exactly. Well, I
suppose it will have to do. It's not like there's much time left before
the deadline, and I still have to get the composition and lighting done.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'dog_vs_fox_2.jpg' (16 KB)
Preview of image 'dog_vs_fox_2.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:14:49 +0300, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
> Well, it's now definitely closer, although not exactly. Well, I
>suppose it will have to do. It's not like there's much time left before
>the deadline, and I still have to get the composition and lighting done.
>
I've posted the files to p.b.m name of Fox4
I'll re-align the fox to be more in line with the photo.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 13:33:43 +0100, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:
>
>
>
>I'll re-align the fox to be more in line with the photo.
I've posted the files to p.b.m name of Fox6 in zip format. Let me know if you
can get it unpacked.
And good luck
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Fox_6_0.jpg' (19 KB)
Preview of image 'Fox_6_0.jpg'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 13:06:01 +0100, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:
>On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:38:18 +0100, Stephen <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote:
>
>>Good, Now the detail, if you want.
>
>Looking down a bit more.
I've just done a test render in PovRay and the texture won't stand up to a close
up :(
Also the hind legs look too flat against the body.
I will correct this
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen wrote:
> I've just done a test render in PovRay and the texture won't stand up to a close
> up :(
> Also the hind legs look too flat against the body.
>
> I will correct this
The texture is not all that important in my image, and I managed to
make the legs not too visible, so the current version is working
acceptably fine for what I want. I'm using it for the scene.
Thanks for your work.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 17:46:45 +0300, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:
>Stephen wrote:
>> I've just done a test render in PovRay and the texture won't stand up to a close
>> up :(
>> Also the hind legs look too flat against the body.
>>
>> I will correct this
>
> The texture is not all that important in my image, and I managed to
>make the legs not too visible, so the current version is working
>acceptably fine for what I want. I'm using it for the scene.
>
That's good :D
> Thanks for your work.
The least that I could do for http://warp.povusers.org/povtips/ That tutorial
has been a godsend for me.
--
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
