POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Diversion : Re: Diversion Server Time
26 Mar 2023 05:19:16 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Diversion  
From: Chris R
Date: 6 Feb 2023 10:05:00
Message: <web.63e116793d612ace14557d745cc1b6e@news.povray.org>
"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> "Chris R" <car### [at] comcastnet> wrote:
> >
> > Here's the version with camera blur.  I'm using the camera35mm.inc from Edouard
> > Poor, but I'm not sure if I believe a 35mm focal length with f6.5 would
> > introduce that much blur.
> >
> That is really gorgeous, especially the lighting. If not for the suspended ball
> (with no movement blur), it looks like a beautiful real-life photo. And I agree
> about the focal blur; seems that a 35mm lens would be sharper even at a lower
> f-stop value. (I used to use a Minolta 35mm film camera-- which I miss.)

That was something I had looked for in an earlier scene, but it seems like
introducing motion blur has to be more of a post-processing step, probably after
producing several images at different clock values.

-- Chris R.

Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.