"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> "Chris R" <car### [at] comcastnet> wrote:
> > Here's the version with camera blur. I'm using the camera35mm.inc from Edouard
> > Poor, but I'm not sure if I believe a 35mm focal length with f6.5 would
> > introduce that much blur.
> That is really gorgeous, especially the lighting. If not for the suspended ball
> (with no movement blur), it looks like a beautiful real-life photo. And I agree
> about the focal blur; seems that a 35mm lens would be sharper even at a lower
> f-stop value. (I used to use a Minolta 35mm film camera-- which I miss.)
That was something I had looked for in an earlier scene, but it seems like
introducing motion blur has to be more of a post-processing step, probably after
producing several images at different clock values.
-- Chris R.
Post a reply to this message