"Kenneth" <kdw### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> "Mr" <m******r******at_hotmail_dot_fr> wrote:
> > If this was to be added to that section of the docs (by some superior authority
> > than me), how would you rephrase all of this in the most concise simplified
> > caveat warning apposition to fit in ? maybe something like :
> > "All camera rays will be perturbed using this one-unit sized pattern. "
> > ?
> Maybe something like this (or to add to your statement)?
> "When used in a camera, the normal pattern will be distorted horizontally,
> depending on your render's aspect ratio. To correct for this, an inverse-scaling
> of the normal is required in x. For example:
> scale <image_height/image_width, 1 1>"
> [Thanks, Thomas]
Finally, before we consider documenting it like that, could maybe some developer
confirm that this is really the intended behaviour and not a bug ? Thanks.
Post a reply to this message