clipka <ano### [at] anonymousorg> wrote:
> Bad example, because the science behind musical harmony is reasonably
> well understood. It all boils down to stuff the Pythagoreans already
> knew about, which is all about the frequency ratios.
> The only complication is the invention of temperaments, which introduce
> a slight offset to just intonation to get some other benefits of musical
Until you get into the really wild stuff of which 432 vs 440 is probably only
the tip of the iceberg. . .
For a flying pirouette into the deep end, clutch your energy crystals and
search: Rosslyn Chapel and you'll land firmly into Giza, Angkor Wat, Hypogeum
Meanwhile, decades later, millions are still endlessly amused by "more cowbell!"
Post a reply to this message