Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
> Op 21-4-2021 om 15:15 schreef jr:
> > ...
> > Google and Wiktionary don't think much -- anything! -- of 'mohogany'.
> True here too but there are a couple from "commercial" sites in the US.
> Probably not. I suppose it is a local variation name. Remember: these
> are commercial names, not scientific.
had not thought of/forgotten they're trade names. will try + remember.
> > (and thanks for making change to spelling)
> Always happy to serve, sir. ;-)
> I am getting adicted! ;-)
Post a reply to this message