Op 17-4-2023 om 08:41 schreef jr:
> hi,
> 
> "Mike Miller" <mil### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> Thomas de Groot <tho### [at] degrootorg> wrote:
>>>   ...
>> I would love to see it. Inverse kinematics would be the way to go. I've used it
>> in Max - it has an 'end effector' that pushes the links, but required rotation
>> restriction on all the joins. Beyond my programming skills. Share if you find.
> 
I still have the files. The problem - as far as I can judge at this 
stage - is that the mannequin needs Moray for posing and moving the 
different parts, after which it is exported to a POV-Ray file to be 
included in a scene. That was how it worked at the time. Possibly I 
would need now to rework such a POV-Ray include into macros to make it 
work from there. Not sure, and unfortunately I have little time to 
plunge deeper in the matter at present. On hold for now, but who knows...?

>
<https://news.povray.org/povray.general/thread/%3CXnsA9AB7C841FAFAseed7%40news.povray.org%3E/>
> 
> user 'ingo' did nice stuff on IK (FABRIK algo).
> 
That is very true.
I got however a warning by Malwarebyte about a trojan at the site Ingo 
mentioned in the threat (https://chiselapp.com/....) in 2018. Real or 
false positive? I did not dare to go further. (I have not yet checked if 
I have a copy on my other laptop though).

-- 
Thomas

Post a reply to this message