Op 11/04/2021 om 17:55 schreef jr:
> I like the idea of archiving and maintaining, etc. however, access to the
> information too has to be considered. when I unzipped the archives I got that
> ... sinking feeling, you know, dozens of files but not even a README
> (equivalent). so I suggest providing an additional document in some format
> (PDF, html, or txt), that gives context and perhaps has a "manifest".
I have hesitated about a README, and opted, for the time being, to give
the info in the headers of the include files. Maybe not the smartest way
to do this indeed. As you can guess, this version of the package is open
> anyway, mindful of Mr's closing comment, I've thrown together an example html
> page with sections for three of the granites -- literally a cut and paste job,
> so layout (and <style>) are not right; it looks for the images in a 'img'
Thank you. I shall delve into it.
Post a reply to this message