POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.animations : Liquid animation 18 Server Time
1 Nov 2024 01:23:54 EDT (-0400)
  Liquid animation 18 (Message 1 to 10 of 10)  
From: fidos
Subject: Liquid animation 18
Date: 20 Mar 2006 14:25:01
Message: <web.441efff330f0d01679c4a710@news.povray.org>
Hello,

I post a new liquid animation. It's a cup of wood falling in a tank of
water.

I introduced the handling of particules in suspension in the water. It's the
first results that I have. You can see that there is a problem with the
object speed at the end of the simulation that doesn't decrease (probably
because I only take into account for the normal efforts between the water
and the object).

I made a quick rendering (no photons and no radiosity).

The video is xvid encoded (I don't succeed to encode it in MPEG1 with good
enough quality and a size of 700 Ko).

Any comment is welcome.

Regards,
Fidos.


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'cup.avi.dat' (692 KB)

From: helge h
Subject: Re: Liquid animation 18
Date: 20 Mar 2006 15:00:01
Message: <web.441f09707fc858581c6902970@news.povray.org>
Wow! Amazing!

H


Post a reply to this message

From: Chambers
Subject: Re: Liquid animation 18
Date: 20 Mar 2006 15:56:31
Message: <441f16ff$1@news.povray.org>
fidos wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I post a new liquid animation. It's a cup of wood falling in a tank of
> water.
> 
> I introduced the handling of particules in suspension in the water. It's the
> first results that I have. You can see that there is a problem with the
> object speed at the end of the simulation that doesn't decrease (probably
> because I only take into account for the normal efforts between the water
> and the object).
> 
> I made a quick rendering (no photons and no radiosity).
> 
> The video is xvid encoded (I don't succeed to encode it in MPEG1 with good
> enough quality and a size of 700 Ko).
> 
> Any comment is welcome.
> 
> Regards,
> Fidos.

The motion of the cup at the beginning seems very clunky, as if the 
initial velocity is too high.  The cup seems to jump instantaneously 
from it's position above the water, to being submerged in it.  After 
that though, the movement is very fluid (no pun intended!) and the 
suspended particles are fascinating to watch.

...Chambers


Post a reply to this message

From: Bob H
Subject: Re: Liquid animation 18
Date: 21 Mar 2006 12:06:04
Message: <4420327c$1@news.povray.org>
Hey now, that's got some potential for analyzing fluid dynamics, eh?  ;)

The spin of the cup is curious. Like it might be interacting in a volatile 
way with the "liquid". Doesn't styrofoam do that in gasoline?

-- 
Bob H  www.3digitaleyes.com
http://3digitaleyes.com/imagery/


Post a reply to this message

From: Jaap
Subject: Re: Liquid animation 18
Date: 21 Mar 2006 14:40:00
Message: <web.442055c57fc85858a8399d8d0@news.povray.org>
the turbulence in the fluid is absolutely amazing. well done.


Post a reply to this message

From: George Pantazopoulos
Subject: Re: Liquid animation 18
Date: 21 Mar 2006 22:25:01
Message: <web.4420c2e17fc85858c0bad8570@news.povray.org>
> Hello,
>
> I post a new liquid animation. It's a cup of wood falling in a tank of
> water.
>
> I introduced the handling of particules in suspension in the water. It's the
> first results that I have. You can see that there is a problem with the
> object speed at the end of the simulation that doesn't decrease (probably
> because I only take into account for the normal efforts between the water
> and the object).
>
> I made a quick rendering (no photons and no radiosity).
>
> The video is xvid encoded (I don't succeed to encode it in MPEG1 with good
> enough quality and a size of 700 Ko).
>

Wow, watching the embedded granules flow turbulently with the water was very
fascinating. I'd love to see more like this. And I would favor sacrificing
radiosity and photons to have longer animations. Well done and looking
forward to your next effort :)

George


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid XP v2
Subject: Re: Liquid animation 18
Date: 22 Mar 2006 15:19:58
Message: <4421b16e$1@news.povray.org>
Ah, very nice.

Must have taken hours to render...


Post a reply to this message

From: fidos
Subject: Re: Liquid animation 18
Date: 23 Mar 2006 15:10:01
Message: <web.442300887fc85858bb1581920@news.povray.org>
Orchid XP v2 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> Ah, very nice.
>
> Must have taken hours to render...

The redering was not so long, around 5 hours. It is because I didn't use
photons and radiosity.

Regards,
Fidos


Post a reply to this message

From: Orchid XP v2
Subject: Re: Liquid animation 18
Date: 23 Mar 2006 16:52:23
Message: <44231897$1@news.povray.org>
>>Ah, very nice.
>>
>>Must have taken hours to render...
> 
> 
> The redering was not so long, around 5 hours. It is because I didn't use
> photons and radiosity.

Oh, right.

My ordinary matt spheres took longer than that...


Post a reply to this message

From: McHannemann
Subject: Re: Liquid animation 18
Date: 1 May 2006 13:25:01
Message: <web.445643d37fc85858bf47a3030@news.povray.org>
Orchid XP v2 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
> >>Ah, very nice.
> >>
> >>Must have taken hours to render...
> >
> >
> > The redering was not so long, around 5 hours. It is because I didn't use
> > photons and radiosity.
>
> Oh, right.
>
> My ordinary matt spheres took longer than that...

Hi is there any chance in getting the stuff for own renders??

Regards,

Thor


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.