POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.animations : T_Stone28 289K Server Time
1 Nov 2024 01:24:10 EDT (-0400)
  T_Stone28 289K (Message 1 to 8 of 8)  
From: Stephen
Subject: T_Stone28 289K
Date: 28 Feb 2006 08:15:01
Message: <web.44044c1b2e8a8a98b1b469160@news.povray.org>
A test animation of t_stone2


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 't_stone2801.mpg' (289 KB)

From: John VanSickle
Subject: Re: T_Stone28 289K
Date: 28 Feb 2006 17:27:37
Message: <4404ce59$1@news.povray.org>
Stephen wrote:

> A test animation of t_stone2

Nothing appears to happen.  Should I download again?

Regards,
John


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: T_Stone28 289K
Date: 1 Mar 2006 03:45:00
Message: <web.44055e07167f37d7b1b469160@news.povray.org>
John VanSickle <evi### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>
> > A test animation of t_stone2
>
> Nothing appears to happen.  Should I download again?
>
> Regards,
> John


povray.animations, Flickering flick help!
If you look closely you will be able to see some slight flickering in the
cube.

Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Sebastian H 
Subject: Re: T_Stone28 289K
Date: 1 Mar 2006 06:34:26
Message: <440586c2$1@news.povray.org>
Stephen wrote:
> A test animation of t_stone2

I find this a bit strange.
There's absolutely no motion in this scene (I hope)
but there is this flicker. It must somehow be related
to the video compression method used.


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: T_Stone28 289K
Date: 1 Mar 2006 07:05:00
Message: <web.44058d9b167f37d7b1b469160@news.povray.org>
"Sebastian H." <van### [at] gmxde> wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
> > A test animation of t_stone2
>
> I find this a bit strange.
> There's absolutely no motion in this scene (I hope)
> but there is this flicker. It must somehow be related
> to the video compression method used.

Correct, that is what it is supposed to show.
It was a test for the thread, in povray.animations, Flickering flick help!



kind.

Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Sebastian H 
Subject: Re: T_Stone28 289K
Date: 1 Mar 2006 08:45:13
Message: <4405a569$1@news.povray.org>
Stephen wrote:



> kind.

Well there is movement though no intended,
so I think it fits here.
It was also educational at least for me as well
as the thread in p.animations.

Sebastian


Post a reply to this message

From: Stephen
Subject: Re: T_Stone28 289K
Date: 1 Mar 2006 10:35:00
Message: <web.4405bdf9167f37d7b1b469160@news.povray.org>
"Sebastian H." <van### [at] gmxde> wrote:
> Stephen wrote:
>

> It was also educational at least for me as well
> as the thread in p.animations.
>

As it was for me, too.

Stephen


Post a reply to this message

From: Mike Williams
Subject: T_Stone28 289K
Date: 2 Mar 2006 03:00:36
Message: <VNr2sDAWUqBEFwB6@econym.demon.co.uk>
You can check whether the effect is occurring in POV-Ray or in the
animation compression routines by taking two raw frames, as output by
POV-Ray, into a suitable image processing application, calculating the
difference between the images and enhancing the contrast.

When I try that with a cube of T_Stone28 with "-J" in the command line
the frames are identical. The difference is perfectly black. If that's
the case for you, then the effect is nothing to do with POV-Ray.

-- 
Mike Williams
Gentleman of Leisure


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.