 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Here's an animation of a kid I modelled years ago (POV-Ray ver 3.1e)...to
this day unfinished. I came across it on a dusty section of my harddrive
and it gave me a chuckle.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'test06.mpv.mpg' (31 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Budgery wrote:
> Here's an animation of a kid I modelled years ago (POV-Ray ver 3.1e)...to
> this day unfinished. I came across it on a dusty section of my harddrive
> and it gave me a chuckle.
On mozilla, and I bet a lot of newsreaders this just appears as junk. I
didn't know what base64 encoding was so I did a google and found a util
to decode it. Anyway here is the decoded version of your anim that
should show up in all newsreaders.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'test06.mpv.mpg' (31 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas Lake wrote:
> On mozilla, and I bet a lot of newsreaders this just appears as junk. I
> didn't know what base64 encoding was so I did a google and found a util
> to decode it. Anyway here is the decoded version of your anim that
> should show up in all newsreaders.
I see base64 is the standard used for sending binary attachments via
email, now I just feel stupid for not knowing this.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Budgery" <bud### [at] yahoo com> wrote:
> Here's an animation of a kid I modelled years ago (POV-Ray ver 3.1e)...to
> this day unfinished. I came across it on a dusty section of my harddrive
> and it gave me a chuckle.
IRTC! IRTC! IRTC! If the arms rotate, you got a dance cycle right there!
Go for it, mon!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas Lake wrote:
> Thomas Lake wrote:
>
>> On mozilla, and I bet a lot of newsreaders this just appears as junk.
>> I didn't know what base64 encoding was so I did a google and found a
>> util to decode it. Anyway here is the decoded version of your anim
>> that should show up in all newsreaders.
>
>
> I see base64 is the standard used for sending binary attachments via
> email, now I just feel stupid for not knowing this.
>
Well I for one benefitted from your research
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Jim Charter wrote:
> Thomas Lake wrote:
>
>>> On mozilla, and I bet a lot of newsreaders this just appears as junk.
>>> I didn't know what base64 encoding was so I did a google and found a
>>> util to decode it. Anyway here is the decoded version of your anim
>>> that should show up in all newsreaders.
>>
>> I see base64 is the standard used for sending binary attachments via
>> email, now I just feel stupid for not knowing this.
>>
> Well I for one benefitted from your research
No reason to feel stupid -- you used the Web Interface and,
understandably, expected it to be compliant. When Thorsten made it, he
used a Macintosh newsreader that worked with it; he couldn't know it
wouldn't work elsewhere. He's fixing it now.
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Dan P wrote:
> No reason to feel stupid -- you used the Web Interface and,
> understandably, expected it to be compliant. When Thorsten made it, he
> used a Macintosh newsreader that worked with it; he couldn't know it
> wouldn't work elsewhere. He's fixing it now.
Except I'm not the one who posted the original message :)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Thomas Lake wrote:
> Dan P wrote:
>
>> No reason to feel stupid -- you used the Web Interface and,
>> understandably, expected it to be compliant. When Thorsten made it, he
>> used a Macintosh newsreader that worked with it; he couldn't know it
>> wouldn't work elsewhere. He's fixing it now.
>
> Except I'm not the one who posted the original message :)
Well then /I'm/ the one who should feel stupid :-)
--
Respectfully,
Dan P
http://<broken link>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
