 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
This is a quick experiment to see how the fire from my elements image looked
when animated. I've animated it by scrolling the granite pattern down whilst
scrolling the turbulence up (well, actually both move in a circle so the
anim loops).
Not too bad but doesn't quite look real.
--
Tek
http://evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'elements-fire anim000.m1v.mpg' (685 KB)
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tek wrote:
> This is a quick experiment to see how the fire from my elements image looked
> when animated. I've animated it by scrolling the granite pattern down whilst
> scrolling the turbulence up (well, actually both move in a circle so the
> anim loops).
>
> Not too bad but doesn't quite look real.
>
Not bad at all. It looks very close to the Real Thing (TM)
--
~Mike
Things! Billions of them!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tek wrote:
> Not too bad but doesn't quite look real.
Very impressive, tho. I think the problem is sometimes a free-floating
bit of flame will "evaporate" from the top down, making it look like the
lick of flame is going downwards.
--
Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
Sabotage? Communist conspiracy? Or just
Microsoft again? Only time will tell.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
For what it is, it looks more real than you'd think. Even so, it's not
going to fool anybody too much.
Of course, if you wanted *really* real, you'd have to do a full physics
pass to compute real gas turbulence... and that's not quite as quick. (!)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Looks very good. The only thing that makes me say "computer generated"
is the lack of transmitted light coming from the flames. If you could
simulate that you could have a very good flame model without having to
go into the physics side of things.
Nice Work. :)
Tek wrote:
> This is a quick experiment to see how the fire from my elements image looked
> when animated. I've animated it by scrolling the granite pattern down whilst
> scrolling the turbulence up (well, actually both move in a circle so the
> anim loops).
>
> Not too bad but doesn't quite look real.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tek wrote:
> This is a quick experiment to see how the fire from my elements image looked
> when animated. I've animated it by scrolling the granite pattern down whilst
> scrolling the turbulence up (well, actually both move in a circle so the
> anim loops).
>
> Not too bad but doesn't quite look real.
Very nice! What about the idea of using the same thing but as an
animated density pattern for media fire? Or is that what this is?
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"Thomas Lake" <smi### [at] hotmail com> wrote in message
news:43858a79$1@news.povray.org...
> Very nice! What about the idea of using the same thing but as an animated
> density pattern for media fire? Or is that what this is?
That is what this is :)
--
Tek
http://evilsuperbrain.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
