POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.animations : Even more trippy :-D [~700 KB] Server Time
1 Nov 2024 05:19:32 EDT (-0400)
  Even more trippy :-D [~700 KB] (Message 1 to 7 of 7)  
From: Andrew the Orchid
Subject: Even more trippy :-D [~700 KB]
Date: 13 Nov 2004 10:33:04
Message: <41962930@news.povray.org>
I can just hear the people crying "make it stop!" as I project this onto 
a huge Omnimax screen! Haha. >:-)

Seriously... are we having fun yet? 0;-)


Post a reply to this message


Attachments:
Download 'tripposcopic1b-post.m1v.mpg' (654 KB)

From: Skip Talbot
Subject: Re: Even more trippy :-D [~700 KB]
Date: 13 Nov 2004 12:15:49
Message: <41964145$1@news.povray.org>
lol, I hate those mornings


Post a reply to this message

From: Tim Nikias
Subject: Re: Even more trippy :-D [~700 KB]
Date: 13 Nov 2004 13:16:09
Message: <41964f69@news.povray.org>
> Seriously... are we having fun yet? 0;-)

Yeah, like it. Seems like a reasonable tumble to me. If you apply this to
asteroids, would this make an interesting, moving asteroid field? OTOH,
asteroids would revolve around an arbitrary axis, not tumble out of control,
or am I mistaken there? Still, worth a try...

-- 
"Tim Nikias v2.0"
Homepage: <http://www.nolights.de>


Post a reply to this message

From: Thomas Lake
Subject: Re: Even more trippy :-D [~700 KB]
Date: 13 Nov 2004 19:50:51
Message: <4196abeb@news.povray.org>
Tim Nikias wrote:
>>Seriously... are we having fun yet? 0;-)
> 
> 
> Yeah, like it. Seems like a reasonable tumble to me. If you apply this to
> asteroids, would this make an interesting, moving asteroid field? OTOH,
> asteroids would revolve around an arbitrary axis, not tumble out of control,
> or am I mistaken there? Still, worth a try...

No there's nothing stopping an asteroid from revolving around several 
axes at once, but of course it wouldn't be random.


Post a reply to this message

From: Matt Burns
Subject: Re: Even more trippy :-D [~700 KB]
Date: 14 Nov 2004 02:58:56
Message: <41971040$1@news.povray.org>
Hi!

I like the motion blur effect. How did you do that? Any special 
postprocessing of extra animation frames with some external program (e.g. 
Photosop) prior to merging them into a smooth animation?

Matt


Post a reply to this message

From: Dan Byers
Subject: Re: Even more trippy :-D [~700 KB]
Date: 14 Nov 2004 16:38:50
Message: <4197D075.A4CE2EF7@huntel.net>
Skip Talbot wrote:
> 
> lol, I hate those mornings

I can remember some late nights lying in bed with the room moving like
that.  That's how you can tell you've had more of a good time than you
probably intended, and a warning to dread the morning that follows!  :)

---------------------
Dan
Goofy Graffix - http://www.huntel.net/goofygraffix


Post a reply to this message

From: Andrew the Orchid
Subject: Re: Even more trippy :-D [~700 KB]
Date: 16 Nov 2004 15:41:57
Message: <419a6615$1@news.povray.org>
> Hi!
> 
> I like the motion blur effect. How did you do that? Any special 
> postprocessing of extra animation frames with some external program (e.g. 
> Photosop) prior to merging them into a smooth animation?

The blur is indeed a postprocessing effect. It was added with VirtualDub 
- it just blends consecutive frames together. (Not sure exactly how it 
works. And I can't find any way of adjusted.)

Andrew.


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.