"Dan P" <dan### [at] yahoocom> wrote in message
news:40590023$1@news.povray.org...
> Why, "Who needs drugs when we have POV-Ray," of course :-)

Aaah, OK. I'll leave it to you to get that implemented. ;^}>
Steve

Post a reply to this message

This is what it looks like on my machine. You can see it doesn't have as much of
a glow as your version. As far as I know I've got no strange settings in POV, I
only installed 3.1 a couple of weeks ago, so it's all set to defaults.

-- 
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com


"Steve Shelby" <ssh### [at] rexnetnet> wrote in message
news:4059a5f4@news.povray.org...
> I opened the same .pov file I sent you and rendered it in pov3.1, and the
> the image looks like the attached file. I did not even have Moray open. Does
> your render look different from that?
> About the clock, Moray's animation plugin produces an .avi directly, without
> any clock values being set in POVray. So if you want to animate the scene in
> POVray without using Moray, you have to set it up there yourself. My
> animation was 8 seconds long and 15 frames per second (119 frames after
> skipping the last one for smooth looping). You simply have to make the cone
> rotate (around the z axis) 360 degrees in the time specified.
> Steve Shelby
>
> "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
> news:40593ac2$1@news.povray.org...
> > I've not had any luck with it. I can't make it look quite like the
> animation
> > even using pov 3.1, there must be some settings moray does implicitly that
> I
> > don't have. Plus there's not actually any animation data in the file,
> nothing is
> > using the clock variable.
> >
> > -- 
> > Tek
> > www.evilsuperbrain.com
> >
> > "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
> > news:40592bc4$1@news.povray.org...
> > > > Thanks. Did you try the 9.36 mb version? It's 800x600 and shows no
> loss from
> > > > the original uncompressed .avi. Or were you wanting to just render a
> still?
> > >
> > > Yeah I saw that version, the resolution's good but it's not very smooth,
> so I
> > > intend to render it with more frames.
> > >
> > > I'll let you know how it goes. :)
> > >
> > > -- 
> > > Tek
> > > www.evilsuperbrain.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message

Attachments:
Download 'cone2.jpg' (15 KB)

Preview of image 'cone2.jpg'

Oh, wow, big difference! I can't imagine what is causing it. I played around
with it in POV3.1 for a while, and came up with nothing. I'm not anything
close to an expert, though. Maybe you should pose the question on
povray.advanced-users.
Steve Shelby

"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
news:405a86e7@news.povray.org...
> This is what it looks like on my machine. You can see it doesn't have as
much of
> a glow as your version. As far as I know I've got no strange settings in
POV, I
> only installed 3.1 a couple of weeks ago, so it's all set to defaults.

Post a reply to this message

"Steve Shelby" <ssh### [at] rexnetnet> wrote in message
news:405ae071$1@news.povray.org...
> Oh, wow, big difference! I can't imagine what is causing it. I played
around
> with it in POV3.1 for a while, and came up with nothing. I'm not anything
> close to an expert, though. Maybe you should pose the question on
> povray.advanced-users.
> Steve Shelby


Be careful posting to povray.advanced-users. It can be nasty in that room.
PS: Tek, the hair -- the hair ROCKS, man! Blue hair -- far out.

-- 
- Respectfully,
Dan
http://<broken link>

Post a reply to this message

"Steve Shelby" <ssh### [at] rexnetnet> wrote in message
news:405ae071$1@news.povray.org...
> Oh, wow, big difference! I can't imagine what is causing it. I played around
> with it in POV3.1 for a while, and came up with nothing. I'm not anything
> close to an expert, though. Maybe you should pose the question on
> povray.advanced-users.

Ah, don't worry about it. I'm not really that bothered about using pov 3.1 any
more! :)

-- 
Tek
www.evilsuperbrain.com

Post a reply to this message