 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Hello,
Here is a test of animation :
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/zesly/video/scifi_demo.avi - DivX 5.0.5 - 1154ko
3 seconds, 76 frames. It tooks almost 2 days to render on an Athlon XP2600+.
The big problem is radiosity. An artefact would be different from a frame to
another so I had to render it with high quality radiosity.
--
ZeSly
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/zesly/
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ZeSly wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a test of animation :
> http://perso.wanadoo.fr/zesly/video/scifi_demo.avi - DivX 5.0.5 - 1154ko
>
> 3 seconds, 76 frames. It tooks almost 2 days to render on an Athlon XP2600+.
> The big problem is radiosity. An artefact would be different from a frame to
> another so I had to render it with high quality radiosity.
I don't understand why this is much of a problem - the light
distribution does not change much between the frames so you can just
generate the radiosity data once and reuse it for the whole animation.
A fly-through would be much more difficult.
Christoph
--
POV-Ray tutorials, include files, Sim-POV,
HCR-Edit and more: http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0013390/
Last updated 11 Jan. 2004 _____./\/^>_*_<^\/\.______
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
the only reply possibel from my point of view would be :
WOW!
The only drawback on the animation is that it's not realy loopable.
Greets,
Jan
"ZeSly" <zes### [at] wanadoo fr> wrote in message news:4034e034@news.povray.org...
> Hello,
>
> Here is a test of animation :
> http://perso.wanadoo.fr/zesly/video/scifi_demo.avi - DivX 5.0.5 - 1154ko
>
> 3 seconds, 76 frames. It tooks almost 2 days to render on an Athlon
XP2600+.
> The big problem is radiosity. An artefact would be different from a frame
to
> another so I had to render it with high quality radiosity.
>
> --
> ZeSly
> http://perso.wanadoo.fr/zesly/
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Here is a test of animation :
Nice!
> 3 seconds, 76 frames. It tooks almost 2 days to render on an Athlon
XP2600+.
Now, if you could spare your computer for about a year I think you could
have about 10 minutes of something special ;)
Cheers,
Ian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:32:26 +0100, Christoph Hormann
<chr### [at] gmxde> wrote:
>ZeSly wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Here is a test of animation :
>> [... 3 seconds, 76 frames. It tooks almost 2 days ...]
>I don't understand why this is much of a problem - [...]
Cool, Christoph, really cool ... :-)))
--
Andreas
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ZeSly wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is a test of animation :
> http://perso.wanadoo.fr/zesly/video/scifi_demo.avi - DivX 5.0.5 - 1154ko
Really cool animation. What did you use for modelling? SDL? or a modeller?
Fidel.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
"ZeSly" <zes### [at] wanadoofr> wrote in message news:4034e034@news.povray.org...
> Hello,
>
> Here is a test of animation :
> http://perso.wanadoo.fr/zesly/video/scifi_demo.avi - DivX 5.0.5 - 1154ko
>
> 3 seconds, 76 frames. It tooks almost 2 days to render on an Athlon
XP2600+.
> The big problem is radiosity. An artefact would be different from a frame
to
> another so I had to render it with high quality radiosity.
Looks like a promo for the next Star Wars!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ZeSly wrote:
>
> 3 seconds, 76 frames. It tooks almost 2 days to render on an Athlon
> XP2600+.
That's less than 40 minutes per frame. I don't worry about render
times until I'm nearing the one-hour mark.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
ZeSly wrote:
> Here is a test of animation :
> http://perso.wanadoo.fr/zesly/video/scifi_demo.avi
> DivX 5.0.5 - 1154ko
I just downloaded and installed the newest DivX codec and I still can't
see this clip...
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
rune|vision: http://runevision.com **updated Jan 29**
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> That's less than 40 minutes per frame. I don't worry about render
> times until I'm nearing the one-hour mark.
Hehe. Try http://www.imp.org :)
The last HiRes-rendering of our IRTC "end of..."-project had frames
worth more than 15 hours of rendering on my Athlon XP 2600 :)
(I have to admit that it took some time to render it, even with the
farm, though)
Florian
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
